Skip to comments.New SNAP Rules Encourage Productivity Instead of Poverty
Posted on 12/21/2018 1:45:35 PM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
More than 20 years ago, Democrats and Republicans came together to reform our welfare programs to restore the system to what it was meant to be: a second chance, not a way of life, in the words of then-President Bill Clinton. Over time, without any changes in the underlying welfare reform legislation of 1996, that ideal has been watered down by out-of-control administrative flexibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Today, at the direction of President Donald J. Trump, we are taking steps to restore integrity to SNAP and move people toward self-sufficiency.
As we approach the mid-point of President Trumps first term, we are seeing substantial economic gains for our nation, including generationally-low unemployment rates. At a time when the jobless rate has hit 3.7 percent the lowest since 1969 and available jobs outnumber those seeking employment, we expect that able-bodied people who are not working, or seeking work, enter or reenter the labor force.
Instead, because of a permissive regulation that allows states to grant waivers to wide swaths of their populations, millions of people who could work are continuing to receive SNAP benefits. The president has directed me, as Secretary of Agriculture, to propose regulatory reforms to ensure that those who are able to work do so in exchange for their benefits. This restores the dignity of work to a sizeable segment of our population, while it is also respectful of the taxpayers who fund the program.
Americans are generous people who believe it is their responsibility to help their fellow citizens when they encounter a difficult stretch. That is the commitment behind SNAP. But like other Federal welfare programs, it was never intended to be a way of life. A central theme of the Trump administration has been to expand prosperity for all Americans, which includes helping people lift themselves out of pervasive poverty. Assisting people toward lives of independence and self-sufficiency is a worthy pursuit along that path.
9th Circuit to rule it unconstitutional to expect able bodied to work.
Welfare needs to be severely cut and limited to six months twice in a lifetime. SNAP needs to be eliminated.
Here! Here! Amen! BUMP!!
The more people who are working productively, the better off we all are. Naturally, dems don’t want this. Then want people poor and permanently in the underclass so they can blame their troubles on Republicans and vote democrat.
Democrats judge their success by the number of welfare recipients they can put on the roles.
Conservatives judge their success by the number of welfare recipients they can take off the roles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.