Posted on 02/15/2019 12:20:50 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
WASHINGTON — What is happening to the Democrats?
Captivated by a handful of liberal superstars, they are venturing where the party has long feared to tread: Steep taxes on the rich. Abolishing an immigration enforcement agency. And proposing a sweeping Green New Deal that calls for an “economic transformation” to combat climate change.
On Thursday, newly-elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez led a chorus of cheers as Amazon announced it was abandoning plans to build a sought-after headquarters in New York City. Activists berated the online giant for a $3 billion package of tax breaks she said the city could better invest in hiring teachers or fixing the subway.
This is not the Democratic Party of yesteryear. Or even last year.
“The Amazon New York fight is an illustration of how power is moving to the left,” said Ben Wikler, of the liberal group MoveOn. “One of the world’s most powerful organizations doesn’t want to pick a fight with progressive activists.”
As the liberal flank celebrates its sudden ascendance in the party, energized by the new House freshmen pushing the party toward bold policy solutions, others wonder if the Democrats are veering so far left they’re about to fall off a cliff.
It’s a valid question ahead of a presidential primary season with an unusually robust roster of contenders trying to wrest the White House from President Donald Trump. The race comes at a time of shifting party loyalties and eroding confidence in traditional corridors of power, a dynamic that has recast the policy prescriptions of both parties.
The big questions for 2020: Will Democrats move beyond the center-left policies that have dominated the party since Bill Clinton’s presidency? And if so, will they find the electorate is repelled, as Republicans claim, or will they discover that a country long described as “center-right” is receptive to a return to liberalism?
Democratic pollster John Anzalone said the leftward lurch that’s playing out in the Amazon fight wouldn’t necessarily hurt the party heading into 2020 and could resonate with voters.
“When you’re doing corporate giveaways, whether for a big company or a sports team, it’s not as cut-and-dry as most people think,” Anzalone said. “The fact is there tends to be a belief that these big corporations have a lot of money and use their power to get deals they don’t need.”
As if to highlight the churn within the party, the 2020 class was mixed in their reactions.
A spokesman for former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg didn’t respond to a request for comment. Howard Schultz, another business-minded former Democrat who’s now weighing an independent bid for president, also declined to comment.
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who have long railed against the influence of corporations, weighed in, as did New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.
“The people of New York and America are increasingly concerned about the power of large multinational corporations and the billions in corporate welfare they receive,” Sanders said in a statement. “Our job is to end the race to the bottom where taxpayers in one city or state are forced to bid against each other for desperately needed jobs. This is what the rigged economy is all about.”
Warren tweeted: “One of the wealthiest companies on the planet – just walked away from billions in taxpayer bribes, all because some elected officials in New York aren’t sucking up to them enough. How long will we allow giant corporations to hold our democracy hostage?”
And Gillibrand said, “Walking away so quickly shows that Amazon was interested in the taxpayer assistance and not being a good neighbor in Queens hiring the greatest workers in the world.”
As liberal activists across the country welcomed Amazon’s decision as a fresh demonstration of the increasing power of the Democratic Party’s far-left wing, Republicans highlighted the same thing, using the situation to cast the modern-day Democratic Party as extreme. Following Trump’s lead, they pepper their speeches with claims that Democrats are veering toward socialism.
“Now, thousands of #New Yorkers will be deprived of good paying jobs at #amazon because of socialists like @AOC – and unfortunately the promise of a #greenjob won’t pay the bills,” former Trump aide Sean Spicer said on Twitter.
On Capitol Hill, it’s hard not to compare the arrival of Ocasio-Cortez and the emerging Democratic divide to the tea party class of 2010 that took control of the House and pushed the Republican agenda rightward, ultimately helping give rise to the politics of Trump.
It’s not just Ocasio-Cortez. She and House colleagues — Reps. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts — jointly announced their opposition to the bipartisan border security deal. They want to cut the Department of Homeland Security’s budget over the administration’s deportation policies, including those that separated families at the border.
The four lawmakers were urged on by activists outside the Capitol, protesting what’s seen as ICE’s unnecessarily harsh deportations and raids against immigrants here illegally.
Omar, who is Muslim-American, pushed the party further into conflict this week with comments about Israel that were widely seen as anti-Semitic. She apologized. But the questions she and others are raising about the longstanding U.S. ally reflect a growing unease among some Democrats with Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the Democratic Party’s diversity in the House is its strength, as evidenced by the way her caucus held unified against Trump’s demand for money from Congress to build the wall on the border with Mexico.
“Welcome to the Democratic Party,” Pelosi said Thursday. “We are not a monolith, never have been. And who would want to lead a party that would be described that way?”
While some high-profile newcomers are capturing media attention, the House majority was also won with new lawmakers who are more measured in their approach to governing even as they battle Trump. All but 19 Democrats approved the bipartisan border package late Thursday.
But other Democrats marvel at how quickly the party has shifted even since the 2016 election.
This week, when the Republican leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell, announced an upcoming vote on the Green New Deal climate change plan as a way to force Democrats into an awkward vote, the Democrats responded, “Bring it on.” They say Americans want answers on climate change, and Republicans have none.
Ocasio-Cortez, who stunned Washington when she knocked off an incumbent party leader during a primary last year, recently suggested a 70 percent marginal tax rate on top earners.
“Anything is possible,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Thursday, “today was the day a group of dedicated, everyday New Yorkers & their neighbors defeated Amazon’s corporate greed, its worker exploitation, and the power of the richest man in the world.”
Harbinger: the residents of Queens, New York are cheering that the jobs they could have had with Amazon are gone ...
Sadly if the economy enters a recession the muddled middle will go left in the election not realizing of course the full ramifications of their stupidity.
"Center-Left"??? Only died-in-the-wool leftists would believe that Dems "center-left" policies have dominated the past 25 years. Authors Steve and Lisa revealed their (expected) leftist biases with that ridiculous statement.
Leaning Left?
They are bending over totally to the left!...............
If they re-elect her in 2020, they are crazier than she is!....................
Left: 'Rats, enemedia, AOC, Pelousy, Shoe-more, Baker and Weld (MA), enabling RINO's (GOPe).
Center: Trump, GOP (Cruz/Lee/Meadows/Gohmert/etc), FR, Jim Lyons (MA). Washington/Adams/Jefferson/Lincoln/Reagan/Madison.
That is all. There are no other points on the political spectrum.
The left-leaning media says as mildly as possible that “Democrats lean left”. These totalitarian politicians are better described as the Ctrl-Left, an exact parallel to what the media calls the “Alt-Right”.
I hope and pray that voters will not choose slavery under globalist socialism. If voters do make that mistake, I pray that the God-given rights included in the Bill of Rights to protect the people against such a disaster will serve their designed purpose - protecting freedom and restoring the rule of law under a limited government.
“As Democrats lean left, will voters follow?”
Yes. Those under 30 yrs. old.
Like Lemmings following Lemmings over the Clift. We can Hope anyway.
CORRECTION: A few "unwilling"-to-work Queens residents, plus a number of Soros-funded "grass roots activists" bused in from out of town, cheered on the loss of local jobs that they would never have applied for anyway.
Leaning left? It’s more like taking off in a gallup.
And, yes, it’ll cost them the Independent vote and the capitalist slice of their own party. It’s suicidal.
It won’t take a recession. Public schools have been turning out 2 generations of really really lefty kiddos now. Their voting patterns are starting to take effect. It won’t be long now before we HAVE a green new deal.
Not long at all now...
Three billion in tax breaks cost nothing. If Amazon comes in and gets 3 billion off their taxes but earns enough to pay 3 billion and 5 dollars, the municipality has 5 dollars more than they had before. Meanwhile thousands of people working and committing commerce in the municipality spend money that generates tax revenues far in excess of the taxes paid directly by Amazon. The girl supposedly has a degree in economics which should give her all the expertise needed to develop those facts. I suspect a lot of people are going to get angry with her and I would not be surprised to see her electoral defeat after only one term.
Three billion in tax breaks cost nothing. If Amazon comes in and gets 3 billion off their taxes but earns enough to pay 3 billion and 5 dollars, the municipality has 5 dollars more than they had before. Meanwhile thousands of people working and committing commerce in the municipality spend money that generates tax revenues far in excess of the taxes paid directly by Amazon. The girl supposedly has a degree in economics which should give her all the expertise needed to develop those facts. I suspect a lot of people are going to get angry with her and I would not be surprised to see her electoral defeat after only one term.
As I understand it, NY estimated Amazon would generate $12 billion in tax revenue for the state and agreed to $3 billion in tax breaks — net loss to NY is about $9 billion in new tax receipts.
Unfortunately it seems that liberals in the end get everything they want except the corporate agendas and maybe that is alright with their elites.
Who knows what lemmings in sheep’s clothing will do.........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.