Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Democrats are saying the statute is not subject to the Constitutional provision for referendum, because it involves public safety.
1 posted on 03/19/2019 4:29:08 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

I like the ancient Greek’s formula. When a lawmaker proposed a law, he stood on a stool with a noose around his neck. If they didn’t like it................


2 posted on 03/19/2019 4:38:55 AM PDT by LouAvul (Socialism is the logical conclusion of liberalism. Anarchy is the logical conclusion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“The Democrats are saying the statute is not subject to the Constitutional provision for referendum, because it involves public safety.”

Bull. All laws are supposedly for public safety.


3 posted on 03/19/2019 4:39:19 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Beware of the voters of NM: they are liberals throughout and eat, talk, and breathe liberalism.


4 posted on 03/19/2019 5:07:44 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

“What is happening in Santa Fe does not reflect what an overwhelming number of New Mexicans want, so we’re going to make sure they are heard.”

The same could be said for virtually all the State Capitols in the country!

Santa Fe, Austin, Sacramento, Albany, Trenton, you name it. And these are doubly bad places if they also house a university.


5 posted on 03/19/2019 5:43:47 AM PDT by vette6387 (Fire Mueller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Something I’ve always wondered about, IF a person living in such a state desires to sell a firearm to a neighbor, can they go onto an Indian Reservation, and make the private sell or trade there as it is not “state control” but under Federal jurisdiction?

That is how Indian Lands bypass state tobacco laws and casino laws.

And their is LOTS of Indian land in NM and the west.

I’ve also wondered if high capacity gun magazines could be sold on Indian Reservations in California and Colorado for the same reason, bypassing state laws.


7 posted on 03/19/2019 7:10:36 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain; All
The federal Constitution protects the enumerated rights of citizens — even if the citizens of a given state claiming those rights are minority voters in that state.

First, federal laws based on enumerated constitutional powers trump state laws.

Article VI, Clause 2: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

Next, the 14th Amendment (14A) expressly gives Congress the power ONLY to strengthen rights that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect, including the 2nd Amendment (2A), again, even if only minority voters of a given state are claiming those rights.

From the 14th Amendment:

Note that the congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of 14A, had included 2A when he read the Bill of Rights as examples of enumerated rights that 14A applies to the states.

John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See 2nd Amendment (Article II) about in middle of 2nd column.)

Also, consider that the Supreme Court has clarified that 14A gives Congress the power ONLY to strengthen constitutionally enumerated rights.

“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added].” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

H O W E V E R …

Regarding Congress's enforcement of 14A protections, we are still stuck with a corrupt, anti-PDJT swamp Congress that will predictably continue to look the other way while misguided, activist states continue to abridge constitutionally enumerated rights in violation of Section 1 of 14A.

The remedy to stop abridgment of enumerated right by renegade states …

In this example, patriots in all states need to come to the rescue of legal minority New Mexico voters claiming their 2A protections by doing the following.

Patriots need to elect a new patriot Congress in the 2020 elections that will not only promise to support PDJT's vision for MAGA, but will also promise to exercise its 14A powers to make penal laws that discourage the states from abridging constitutionally enumerated rights, laws that strengthen 2A in this New Mexico example.

Insights welcome.

11 posted on 03/19/2019 8:45:00 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson