Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As tariff hike looms, China asks U.S. to meet it halfway, denies backtracking
Reuters ^ | 09-05-19 | Yawen Chen, Se Young Lee

Posted on 05/09/2019 8:03:16 AM PDT by Monrose72

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: jimmygrace

You mean steal the other half!


41 posted on 05/09/2019 10:11:45 AM PDT by Monrose72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL


42 posted on 05/09/2019 10:16:10 AM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

China brinked


43 posted on 05/09/2019 10:20:44 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (AOC: The brain of a tea bisquit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

Do not give up anything to the communist Chinese. We should never have moved our industries there. Our _federal_reserve_ made all the money they earned in USA and the west, all over again when they funded China’s build out. The reserve is USA’s biggest problem.


44 posted on 05/09/2019 10:51:03 AM PDT by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam ; USAgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

Big difference from when the Iran nuclear deal was negotiated: Kerry and Moniz caved on everything at the end.


45 posted on 05/09/2019 10:51:13 AM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monrose72

Good. China can see that Trump is serious and they better cooperate for their own good.

Go, Trump, MAGA!


46 posted on 05/09/2019 10:55:45 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Based on what I’ve read, prices on most imported Chinese products didn’t increase mainly because China devalued its currency. That devaluation tends to increase our trade deficit with China because it makes our exports more expensive in China. So while the tariffs have brought in a substantial amount of revenue, this policy hasn’t reduced our trade deficit with China yet. We need a deal that greatly increase US exports to China to bring down our trade deficit with China by at least 50%.

The general belief among economists and business people is that protectionism and tariffs slow down global economic growth. So there are unintended consequences to protectionism, including greater economic uncertainty and lower expected economic growth, and that drives down business investment and stock prices in the financial markets. Lower stock prices then brings down consumer demand and business confidence, which leads to slower economic growth. So while protectionism can save some manufacturing jobs, it’s doubtful that it actually leads to more total employment in the US.

But we do need to cut our trade deficit with China by at least 50%, and the Trump administration is making the first serious effort ever to make that happen. There’s got to be a way to do that while rescinding the vast majority of tariffs on both sides. That kind of deal will cause an economic boom into the 2020 election and a landslide victory for Trump, at least in the electoral college. I’d love to see him win the popular vote too, and derail this dangerous liberal attempt to effectively eliminate the electoral college and elect the President by total popular vote. We’ll see great frustration and numerous childish temper tantrums among liberals if Trump also wins the popular vote by a significant margin. I’d love to see that happen.


47 posted on 05/09/2019 12:21:42 PM PDT by socialism_stinX (That socialist dog don't hunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: socialism_stinX

So while protectionism can save some manufacturing jobs, it’s doubtful that it actually leads to more total employment in the US.
********************************************
Sorry...you need to reassess. These are TARIFFS ON ONE COUNTRY. They are not designed to “protect” domestic production but to “punish” China until it’s compliant with a new trade agreement.


48 posted on 05/09/2019 12:44:17 PM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Well that’s the theory, but it hasn’t really worked out that way. China devalued its currency, so they haven’t lost much in exports to the US. Meanwhile, we’ve lost some exports to China and the trade deficit has stayed about the same. So we haven’t “punished” them much at all.

We need a trade deal that cuts our trade deficit with China by at least 50%, by greatly increasing US exports to China, while rescinding the vast majority of tariffs on both sides. There has to be a way to make that happen. That kind of deal will cause an economic boom into the 2020 election and Trump will win a huge landslide victory in the electoral vote. Go Trump Team! MAGA!


49 posted on 05/09/2019 1:01:32 PM PDT by socialism_stinX (That socialist dog don't hunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: socialism_stinX

China devalued its currency, so they haven’t lost much in exports to the US. Meanwhile, we’ve lost some exports to China and the trade deficit has stayed about the same. So we haven’t “punished” them much at all.
*********************************************
Well, good. We can keep raising tariffs on Chinese imports and they won’t consider themselves punished. They can keep devaluing their currency and see how that works out for them WITH OTHER COUNTRIES. I’m liking this more and more.


50 posted on 05/09/2019 1:12:25 PM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

“China Brinked”
I love it!


51 posted on 05/10/2019 6:25:51 AM PDT by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jz638

To avoid paying the China Tax, Americans can buy products sourced else where. When that is done, the tariffs bite because to China, the sale is lost.

If Americans pay the China tax, China merchants still get the sale and the trade imbalance continues


52 posted on 05/10/2019 6:29:23 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson