Skip to comments.Lindsey Graham Just Introduced New Legislation to Fix the Border Crisis, Here's What it Does
Posted on 05/15/2019 8:54:11 AM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham held a press conference Wednesday morning to announce new legislation, the Secure and Protect Act of 2019, aimed at fixing the current border crisis and strengthening security.
"Today I'm going to introduce legislation designed to deal with the crisis at our border," Graham said. We have a perfect storm brewing at the border because of a series of broken and outdated laws related to asylum and children.
"What I'm trying to do is stop the flow coming from Central America to regain control of our border and stop a humanitarian crisis that I think is just going to get worse over time. One of the most important things I can stress to you is that people are trying to get caught. They're not avoiding getting caught," Graham continued. "So when we talk about building a wall as Republicans, that makes sense to stop illegal entry into the country, try to direct people into areas where we have a better chance of apprehending them. That doesn't work when the goal of the person is to find a Border Patrol agent and turn yourself in."
Graham addressed calls from lawmakers to give additional funding to Central American countries, arguing it won't stop the problem. The real problem with the current crisis are the loopholes in U.S. immigration law.
"To those who want to give more money to Central America, it won't stop the problem. They're going to keep coming to the United States...no amount of money is going to stop people from coming," Graham said, noting he's in charge of foreign assistance on the Appropriations Committee. "No matter how high the wall will be built, no matter how many drones you have, no matter how many agents you put at the border, they'll keep coming because they want to get caught."
The legislation, which is 11-pages long, allows federal immigration authorities to keep families together in detention centers for 100 days, allows for unaccompanied alien children to be swiftly returned home to their families, reforms the asylum system and clarifies asylum standards for "credible fear" in order to cut down on rampant abuse. Those seeking asylum will be required to do so in a U.S. consulate or embassy in Central America or Mexico.
"No more asylum claims at the U.S. border if you're from Central America," Graham said.
Currently, families and unaccompanied minors can only be held for 20 days. Because of the lengthy processing backlog for asylum seekers, they are released into American communities.
"If you're an unaccompanied minor from Central America, under our law we can only hold you 20 days at DHS, then we turn you over to labor HHS. Ninety-eight percent of the unaccompanied minors who make it to America from Central America never leave the United States. Families know this, word is out on the street in the n triangle countries that if your child can get here by themselves then the chance of them staying in America is almost 100 percent. We are incentivizing a horrible journey," Graham said. "Under our law if you come as a unit, family unit, and you have a minor child, we can only hold the family for 20 days because we don't want to separate the family. We don't have enough detention bed space. We release the entire family after 20 days. So word is out on the street in Central America that if you bring a minor child with you, your chance of getting deported goes to almost zero. Your hearing date is years away and we release you inside the country and that's the goal of coming. This legislation is going to deal with the problem."
Graham's legislation also calls for the hiring of 500 additional immigration judges to get through the 900,000 case asylum backlog.
More on asylum abuse numbers from the White House:
-On average, out of every 100 aliens subject to expedited removal who claim a fear of persecution, only about 12 will ultimately be granted asylum.
-Around half of all aliens who make a credible fear claim and are subsequently placed in removal proceedings do not actually apply for asylum.
-The number of aliens who do not show up to court and are ordered removed in absentia has soared, with 17,200 removal orders issued in absentia in the first quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2019.
You can watch Graham's remarks below: VIDEO AT LINK.
If they never make it across the border in the first place they can’t surrender to a Border Patrol agent.
That’s the whole purpose of a wall.
It needs to be repealed and applied. Retroactively.
Take away birth citizenship
Take away ALL welfare/health benfits for non-citizens
Take the biometrics of any person stopped, bar them permanently from entry
And....we might have to shoot some of them.
This is absurd.
What our political leaders have created is what insurance companies call an “attractive nuisance”. Open borders, and a generous welfare state open to all comers.
So major party political candidates are totally fine with both open borders and simultaneously demanding that “every human being” within our borders has an automatic claim on our resources, simply due to the fact they are here. “Show up, pay up” in a nutshell.
This has to stop, there is no way around it, and our politicians have to recognize they are creating a humanitarian crisis, not solving it.
I'm all about border security, but come on ... shoot them?! Are you serious?!
Lindsey does not want a wall. I disagree.
I do like his idea of having them apply for asylum in their home countries. We actually need to reduce chances to obtain asylum.
I like what I hear and have read about Graham’s plan. So far, I don’t see anything wrong with it. It addresses a lot of the problems and sounds do-able.
It’s Congress’ responsibility to fix the laws that got things so screwed up. This is the first immigration reform proposal to Congress that we’ve seen in a long time.
Be better if they never even reach the wall in the first place.
This is about the technical aspect of asylum. and it makes perfect sense. They should have "papers" of some sort and children with birth certificates if applying in their home country. Of course, we need to sit at the table to review any incoming.
He didn’t say he doesn’t want a wall.
He said a wall is for preventing illegal entry but doesn’t work on people wanting to turn themselves in to claim asylum.
Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate today!
Well-said, they certainly have.
Graham also is 100% right on the need for more immigration judges.
People worthy of asylum to this country should number less than 100 per year.
(Our politicians are abusing us with the asylum BS)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.