Star-Studded Cast to Perform Live Reading of the Mueller Report

I dunno. I liked when Col. Potter read the M1 Garand maintenance manual to a little Korean kid like a bedtime story. LOL

Law Works is an organization catering to bipartisan voices

"Bipartisan" - what a joke.

Maybe they'll prove me wrong by reading some of Hillary's criminally-shared classified emails from the pedophile Anthony Weiner's laptop.

I'm guessing they won't.

Per Nolte on BB, 2 months ago:

Mueller’s list of ten “obstruction” examples is so underwhelming, so frivolous and desperate, he stands alone as the only prosecutor in history to have ten pieces of “evidence” and no case.

Now to the specific list of Mueller’s ten absurd examples of “obstruction.”

1. ALLEGATION: The president told disgraced former F.B.I. Director James Comey he “hoped” Comey could see his way clear of letting go of former National Security Adviser Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who was under investigation, even after the White House fired him.

TRUTH: Trump had the constitutional authority to legally put a stop to this investigation and did not use it. Expressing one’s “hope” is not an act of obstruction, nor is it an order … it is the expression of one’s hope. What’s more, Trump is expressing this hope about someone else, not himself.

2. ALLEGATION: Trump wanted his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, to not recuse himself from the Russia investigation.

TRUTH: So what? Trump selected Sessions to be his attorney general because he had faith in him in that role. Once Sessions recused himself, Trump — and don’t forget we are talking about a man innocent of the treason charges being investigated — was now at the mercy of the same Deep State that was already selectively and illegally leaking to frame him for treason.

Trump was not calling on Sessions to reverse his recusal and shut down the investigation. He wanted someone he trusted overseeing it. That is not obstruction, it’s common sense and the way you would expect an innocent man to act.

3. ALLEGATION: Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation.

TRUTH: Trump fired Comey on Rod Rosenstein’s recommendation. Trump fired Comey because Comey deliberately set him up with that briefing about the phony dossier (Comey’s briefing was the hook the fake news media used to make what became known as the pee pee dossier public). Trump fired Comey because Comey refused to report the truth — that the president was not under investigation and Trump felt (for legitimate reasons) as though he were being blackmailed. Trump fired Comey, as he told Lester Holt on NBC, because he knew Comey would drag his feet with the Russian investigation and Trump wanted to put the issue behind him.

The only way the firing of Comey could be construed as obstruction is if Comey’s replacement agreed to stop the investigation. That didn’t happen because Trump wanted the exact opposite: he wanted the matter resolved.

4. ALLEGATION: Trump was angry about the appointment of a special counsel and expressed a desire to fire people.

TRUTH: So what? Mueller is actually attempting to claim that Trump’s tweets about the “witch hunt” and his threats to fire people (that were never followed through on) constitute obstruction.

An innocent man raging against a plot to frame him is not, in any legal or moral sense, obstruction. What’s more, had Trump followed through with firing Mueller and Sessions, that would not have been obstruction because it was well within his legal authority to do so.

5. ALLEGATION: Trump asked his former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to tell Sessions to announce that the investigation was very unfair to him, and that he had done nothing wrong.

TRUTH: So what? Asking your attorney general to tell the public the truth is not obstruction.

6.ALLEGATION: Trump was not publicly forthcoming about the Trump Tower Meeting.

TRUTH: Lying to the media or to the public is not obstruction of justice. All Trump did was spin the meeting in the most favorable light possible — which only proves he’s a politician. When Obama did this, the media gushed over his amazing talent at “slow-walking the truth.”

If lying to the public or to the media is obstruction of justice, the jails are gunna be awfully full.

7. ALLEGATION: Trump continued to pressure Sessions to unrecuse himself.

TRUTH: So what? Trying to put someone else in charge of an investigation is not obstruction. In fact, the Mueller Report notes that Trump told Sessions: “I’m not going to do anything or direct you to do anything. I just want to be treated fairly” — which tells you that Mueller including this in his childish listicle is his way of padding his non-case.

8. ALLEGATION: Trump didn’t want the public to know he had “directed McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed in June 2017 and that McGahn had threatened to resign rather than carry out the order. “

TRUTH: Again, lying to the press and to the public is not obstruction, and if Trump had truly wanted Mueller fired he could have legally done it. This entire narrative about Trump wanting people fired or wanting to put Sessions in charge of the investigation is breathtakingly desperate and dumb.

9. ALLEGATION: Trump praised former campaign manager Paul Manafort and Flynn when they held strong and criticized them when they rolled over.

TRUTH: It is not obstruction of justice to express an opinion and these opinions are perfectly in line with an innocent man being falsely accused of treason while the Deep State and media attempt to frame him.

What’s more, Trump was almost always publicly expressing these opinions. People do not commit crimes in front of 50 million Twitter followers.

10. ALLEGATION: Trump praised his former personal lawyer Michael Cohen when he held strong and criticized him after he rolled over.

TRUTH: As you can see, to pad his non-case to number ten, rather than include Cohen with Manafort and Flynn, Mueller makes Trump’s reaction to Cohen a separate item.

Sorry, but in America telling a friend to “stay strong” when he’s under investigation and then publicly calling him a “rat” when he falsely accuses you of crimes is not obstruction.

Robert Mueller knows what obstruction of justice is. What he’s hoping is that the public doesn’t know.

>>For one night only on Monday, June 24, stars will perform a live reading of passages from the Mueller report

WAIT. Didn’t the Left say that the report was redacted?

Now they are going to selectively present only parts of the report to the sheeple?

Stalinists lie. Always

F-Hollywood Reds. Million dollar Marxists.

Any fool who would attend this deserves to lose their money for nothing.

A dramatic reading of the Warren Commission Report would be more exciting. Yet I’d probably skip that one, too.

LOL

Each to his own. I’d pay to see/hear Tom Selleck reading from the phone book :)

LOL with the pic!

That could be all of us here, still waiting for those deep-state “BOMBSHELL” revelations to go “KABOOM!”

Speaking of which, whatever happened to the next Horowitz report? As of April, the release was to be “possibly in May, probably in June.” And now June is about over.

I want my “KABOOMS,” and not just the July 4 kind....

Piper Perabo-hit the wall, hard, a few years back
Sigourney Weaver- hit the wall
Julia Louis-Dreyfus-hit the wall
Any eye candy at this event?

Celebrities, we are so fortunate to have Celebrities try to micro manage our thoughts and lives

https://gameshows.fandom.com/wiki/Battle_of_the_Network_Stars/November_13,_1976

I prefer the first Battle of the Network Stars.

Adrienne Barbeau and Lynda Carter in some sort of swimming contest (sigh)

Now, I wish they plunk these precious celebrities on an island and have a “Hunger Game” with true actual consequences

This will flop quicker then the “An Evening With The Clintons’’ tour did.

Boooorrrrrrriiinnnggg!
Next, the 1953 Hollywood phone book.

I’m so glad that John Lithgow landed a new gig seeing that his run as Bubba Clinton on Broadway is ending earlier than planned.