Skip to comments.Penny Nance: Dem candidates are really pro-abortion, not pro-choice
Posted on 06/29/2019 8:05:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Remember these statements by Democrats seeking to become their partys presidential nominee?
I believe that reproductive rights are human rights, they are civil rights, and they are non-negotiable, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York said in an interview with The Atlantic earlier this month.
We must be vigilant in protecting a womans right to choose, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey said on Twitter in January.
now more than ever, we must remain steadfast in our defense of a womans right to choose, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii said in a statement on the 40th anniversary of the landmark 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision the legalized abortion nationwide.
The Democratic presidential candidates want everyone to know they support abortion. They call this choice which indicates a decision a woman makes about whether to have an abortion or have a baby. Many are now calling this choice a reproductive, human and civil right.
But not really.
Where were the Democratic presidential hopefuls when a British judge recently ruled that a mentally disabled woman in her 20s with the mental age of a child between ages 6 and 9 must undergo a forced abortion against her will and against her mothers will? The judge cited the pregnant womans best interests and determined the pregnancy termination was the best option.
The government ruled and was very clearly forcing this woman to have an abortion, even though her choice was to give birth.
Thankfully, the pregnant womans mother a former midwife appealed and a British appeals court overturned the lower court ruling Monday after an outcry from pro-life groups (on both sides of the Atlantic) and Catholic bishops. This was clearly the right thing to do, and I commend the higher court for the ruling.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The term “pro-choice” implies that the person who holds that position wants women to be fully informed. But that is not at all the case. Those who call themselves “pro-choice” do everything they can to ensure that women remain uneducated about pregnancy. This is what makes them pro-abortion, not pro-choice.
They are pro Gun Grabbing ans pro turning America into Venezuelan Utopian Paradise 2.0
Whatever the liberal or libertarian misguided principle of "choice" may have been at one time, these are politicians.
The world's biggest abortion outfit is a big big donor.
Could it be that pro-choice groups and candidates are really just pro-abortion and the term choice only applies if the choice is abortion? - PENNY NANCE
Gosh! I have always thought that pro-choice was pro-abortion. Even with the distinction, it all stinks to high heaven.
The Baby Killing Communist Party candidates - Darwin Award finalists.
People who favor the right to bear arms are not called pro choice but against gun control.
People who favor capital punishment are not called pro choice for juries and judges but for the death penalty.
People who refuse the right to life to an unborn child should be called for abortion.
They are all really pro-murder and they will not stop at murdering babies. They all really want to murder all of their enemies but they have to make it socially acceptable to do so first to make sure no one rises up against them after the murdering is complete.
Think about it folks. Right now, babies are being murdered and whole sections of our society would physically attack you if you tried to save even one baby.
Since the Democrat hopefuls to become President have been so honest of late in their anti-American rants, it’s time for them to say out loud what the world has seen in the Democrat Party in the last 30 years: Every live birth is a cosmic failure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.