Nashville's Next Mayor May Be a Black Conservative Woman

She also anticipated by years the political disruptions arising from what she considers the double standard of affirmative action, as well as from multiculturalism and excessive immigration, particularly from the perspective of many whites as an aggrieved reaction to all of the above.

She foresaw, by years, that “white nationalists” WOULD take those things and try to steer the reactions to them to their own “racial” agendas. Conservatives needed responses to all those things that were inclusive on principle (opportunity is for all), not by pandering with affirmative action to identity groups as the Left & Liberals have done.

Yes, as a “black” woman she has a perspective that the majority of Conservatives otherwise like herself do not. That does not make the foundations of her thinking any less conservative.

Well it's interesting isn't it, as you point out, that someone could be for example, Black, and a Nationalist.

That means of course they are a Black Nationalist.

But, they aren't a Black Nationalist, that is someone who wants a separate Ethno-state for people of a certain racial characteristic. See the difference? Leftists of course aren't having any of it, who constantly pound the idea that any sort of patriotism or love of country or anything of the sort is automatically BAD. We're supposed to worship government, apparently, at least and until they can collapse the entire system under the weight of a myriad of fundamental contradictions and schizophrenic, Calvin-Ball public policy, and "elites" looting the Treasury after which we become subservient to the "New World Order" or whatever globalist soul-stealing bureaucratic nightmare they have in store

Whites absolutely will go "Tribal", as Dr. Swain points out. Why would anyone expect anything different? There's a certain tautology to the left's arguments that are very telling. They seem to predict with almost a certain glee perhaps, that America will soon become a "Majority Minority" (Yet another contradiction) country soon. This didn't happen by accident, it has long been a deliberate policy, and it begs the question whether it was predicated on the idea of causing turmoil in the first place. Multi-culturism does not have a particularly good track record.

I wish I could find a WSJ article from not too many weeks ago.

I think it must of been around the 4th of July, and all the vile stuff about standing for the pledge, the national anthem, the American flag and “reparations”.

It was by a “black” American, a self-made businessman in Texas who served the military in WWII when it was segregated.

So, here he is today, someone who has lived with and through the bigotry that some “black” elitists today have never known, and yet he opposes the idea of “reparations” totally and is proud of HIS country, with some bad history behind it and all.

The narrative must be maintained at every cost, that blacks are not part of the American dream. That’s why they’ve ramped everything up to eleventy, they want everybody fighting amongst themselves and not casting their eyes on them. It’s all BS 24/7 The candidates debate is perfect example of this. The very same people who screwed everything up beyond belief expect rational beings to believe they are somehow going to “fix it” with yet even more government, and whitey is the source of all the world’s ills. It’s vile and disgusting, and I hope they die in a fire. They deserve it, and more.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.