We want to see ONE WORD and ONE WORD ONLY. CHARGED. Or INDICTED.
Two words. We want to see two words only. Charged or indicted. And Arrest.
Three words.
Amongst the words we want to see are...
Posted on 08/01/2019 12:03:50 AM PDT by Segovia
Rather than employ the name-calling tactics of the left, why cite some example as a reason why I should not trust Barr.
We want to see ONE WORD and ONE WORD ONLY. CHARGED. Or INDICTED.
Two words. We want to see two words only. Charged or indicted. And Arrest.
Three words.
Amongst the words we want to see are...
Absolutely. Especially with the 'technicallity' that the leaked memos weren't classified until AFTER they were leaked.
Why make the first charge against Comey such a weak one. There are too many slam dunks to start with a shaky case.
But can we expect some of the people around here to understand this?
They'll see. Maybe they'll be embarrassed by this behavior when they do.
Or maybe not.
Not likely.
“lack of candor” is a peculiar Burease phrase; it’s damning.
does the name “Ruby Ridge” ring any bells? Barr represented Horiuci pro-bono.....
I think we are all in agreement that Hannity is way past his use-by date-———— he is getting sooooooo tiresome.
A lawyer represents a client ... is that supposed to matter to me?
well, then, I guess you are a tad dense. Represented “pro-bono”, an agent who shot a woman holding an infant in cold blood. No, you don’t matter one damn bit to me.
Yeah, sure, resort to ad hominem when you have no other argument.
Lawyers defend clients. Even the guilty deserve a defense.
Paid or unpaid changes nothing about that.
If you had a case to make to show otherwise, you’d make it.
But instead you insult, which likely means you have no case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.