Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gabbard Torches MSNBC Host: It Sounds Like Kamala's Giving You Her Talking Points
Townhall.com ^ | August 3, 2019 | Beth Bauman

Posted on 08/03/2019 6:40:36 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
She makes Rand Paul look like a war-mongerer. I am not an interventionist by any means; but there will be times when U.S. military will be needed. Gabbard wants us to be the equivalent of an Ostrich.

I'm with you on this one, E3. The challenge of course is to know where and how to use the military (and where not to). Not so easy, as we've seen since WWII. Tough talk about promoting freedom is often followed by guilt-ridden cut and run vacuums. Neither gets us to the foreign policy we claim we want.

101 posted on 08/04/2019 5:53:29 AM PDT by rhombus10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
Screw her head on 20 degrees to the right and she’d make a good Republican.

Well, maybe after a few beatings by the RAT Majority Whip, she'll look for some relief on the right side of the aisle....but she'd probably still only be a RINO.

102 posted on 08/04/2019 8:06:25 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( "The Owl" eats RATs for breakfast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AllAmericanGirl44

Tulsi is calling for an end to the forever wars that are drawing our resources and creating massive Muslim refugee flows to the US

If I have a “crush,” it’s on that message. It used to be Trumps message, but he’s muted it somewhat. He’s even threatening to send warships to Venezuela, as if that puddly backwater represents any threat to the US.

I’m hoping Tulsi’s message will remind Trump he wasnt elected by following the McCain ideology of endless new wars. Just the opposite - many people voted for him hoping to stop the neocon craziness


103 posted on 08/04/2019 9:00:19 AM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Point well taken. If Donna Brazille can do it.....


104 posted on 08/04/2019 10:03:28 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: octex

I want to see her get enough support to stay in the race. I want to see her rip a new one for Kameltoe in the next debate.


105 posted on 08/04/2019 11:11:02 AM PDT by miserare ( Indict Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: thinden

No need to be sarcastic.

Liberals will always be with us. It’s in everybody’s interest that the next generation of libs be in the Hubert Humphrey/Scoop Jackson mold than the little Leninists we have today.

With the Lord’s help, Rep. Gabbard and a few others may acquire a bit of wisdom in the coming years. Do I think this is going to happen? No, but one can always pray that the America’s political fever will break.


106 posted on 08/04/2019 11:16:28 AM PDT by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Nothingburger

I actually hope the day comes when I will be considered a liberal.

I always considered myself as a “Classic Liberal”, then the Communists hijacked the term.


107 posted on 08/04/2019 11:18:41 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You and free-market champion Friedrich von Hayek, among others. Although considered a champion of right-wing economics, the Nobel prize winner actually wrote an essay about why he didn’t consider himself a conservative.

Conservatism as it consists today is about two parts classical liberalism (economic freedom under the rule of law) and one part classical conservatism (faith, family, and tradition).

That’s why I try to avoid using the word “liberal” when “Leftist” or “Socialist” or “Communist” is much more accurate.


108 posted on 08/04/2019 11:41:02 AM PDT by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

You were not impressed? I just watched it, and it was a great and patriotic tribute to our vets...of which she is one. How many of the other 19 ‘Rats ever put on the uniform in defense of this great nation? Maybe Sleepy Joe.

I want to see her knock out Fauxahontas, KlubKar, and Roundheels! Also that dingbat Sillyglands.


109 posted on 08/04/2019 12:24:57 PM PDT by miserare ( Indict Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

In this multicultural world seems logical that talking heads need to provide their ethnic background and cultural heritage so we know exactly where they are coming from with their punditry and perspectives.


110 posted on 08/04/2019 2:32:58 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Without freedom of speech we have no democracy and will lose all our freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

In this multicultural world seems logical that talking heads need to provide their ethnic background and cultural heritage so we know exactly where they are coming from with their punditry and perspectives.


111 posted on 08/04/2019 2:41:10 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Without freedom of speech we have no democracy and will lose all our freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bramps

You make a good point she could be a threat that I dont see coming from others.


112 posted on 08/04/2019 2:49:17 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Without freedom of speech we have no democracy and will lose all our freedoms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone

“In this multicultural world seems logical that talking heads need to provide their ethnic background and cultural heritage so we know exactly where they are coming from with their punditry and perspectives.”

The other option is to simply turn them off. You have total control over that... and it does wonders for your tranquility.


113 posted on 08/04/2019 2:49:35 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

OMG
What a boring speech and a boring speaker.

Does anyone have any idea what she was talking about?

She’s not “cute” or even all that attractive. She’s just cuter, or more attractive than anyone else running...

BFD

***************************

Sorry but she is smoking hot. At least from a male standpoint. And I am embarrassingly critical of women’s looks. Her appearance may actually work against her with the female vote as I think a lot of women will find reasons not to vote for her that aren’t the actual reason, which is being envious of her appearance. Your post may prove my point.

Until she opens her mouth, Kamala Harris is a reasonably attractive woman. But side-by-side in the camera shots with Gabbard, Harris looked like an old, haggard, beast.


114 posted on 08/04/2019 4:50:08 PM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson