Posted on 08/05/2019 9:48:44 AM PDT by george76
FBI is implicated in destroying evidence to benefit Clinton..
In breaking news, the American Center for Law and Justice or ACLJ (Jay Sekulow's organization, not related to his role as the President's attorney), has obtained actual copies of the immunity agreements pertaining to Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson in the Hillary email scandal. This was a stunning litigation win, hard-fought after years of litigation by the ACLJ attorneys, who were unable to extract the documents through the normal FOIA processes, due to a lack of cooperation by the government.
In reviewing what the agreements uncovered, keep in mind that Cheryl Mills was Secretary Clinton's Chief of Staff at the State Department and then bizarrely, she subsequently served as Clinton’s attorney, representing her in the email scandal. Heather Samuelson worked on Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, and then became a Senior Advisor to her at the State Department, as well as the White House liaison. Somehow, she also became one of Clinton's personal attorneys during the email scandal.
The immunity agreements issued by the government, were crafted so that the agencies could extract information from the parties, despite the fact that this is not necessary because DOJ has the power to require that the information be turned over. Clinton kept classified emails on a private server in violation of Federal law, and the immunity agreements reveal that both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were actively involved in the cover-up of these emails as well as in the destruction of evidence. According to Jordon Sekulow, Executive Director of the ACLJ, it is extremely unusual for someone involved in a criminal cover up, who needs an immunity deal to ensure the evasion of jail time, later becomes the attorney representing the other potential criminal or co-conspirator.
The agreements issued were with DOJ and the FBI. They asserted that Mills and Samuelson would turn over the computers to them, but stipulated that they weren't turning over "custody and control". This critical point is a legal and factual bunch of bunk. The FOIA statute applies to information in the agencies' "custody and control". Anything not in their custody or control cannot be FOIA'd. It is impossible to have an agency physically have a computer and not have it in their "custody or control." Custody and control is not something that suspects have to expressly give over or agree to give over. When they give over the evidence, then obviously, as a matter of fact, they are also giving the agency "custody and control" over that evidence. Suspects cannot withhold "custody and control" by mere words or lack of consent, as consent is not required. In other words, these agreements are extremely flawed and whomever signed off on them should be investigated and perhaps prosecuted. It is clear that the purpose of this clause was to make the arguably illegal activities of Mills and Samuelson out of the reach of FOIA --- in other words, it would be withheld from the public. This is the very definition of corruption.
Additionally, the immunity agreements were broad in scope. There were numerous charges that the agreements gave them immunity from including potential violations of the Federal Records Act, the Classified Information Act and the Espionage Act. According to the ACLJ, nobody has ever gotten immunity from the Espionage Act before. Normally, immunity is for lesser crimes like obstruction of justice, but not espionage. If Mills and Samuelson were charged and convicted of every crime from which they received immunity, they would be potentially subject to twenty-eight years in jail each.
After Clinton illegally sent classified emails on a private server and cell phones (and by the way, people have gone to jail for this even when they did so accidentally because it's that serious), and after Mills and Samuelson purposely worked to cover up and conceal both the emails and the destruction of evidence, and after they were given a sweetheart deal that nobody in history has ever gotten, they became the attorneys for Clinton, representing her in the email case. This shouldn't be allowed because it is a conflict of interests, and not only gives the appearance of impropriety, but indeed, constitutes actual impropriety.
Subsequently, Mills and Samuelson finally gave the computers over to the FBI, which per their agreements, limited the FBI’s investigation. The FBI agreed to limit a) the method by which the emails investigated would be obtained; b) the scope of files which would be investigated, and c) the timeframe parameters for investigated emails. In other words, the FBI agreed in the immunity contracts not to do a full investigation on the Clinton emails. To make matters worse, again, per the immunity agreements, the FBI agreed to destroy the computers that had the back-up emails. As Congressman Jim Jordan referenced during the Mueller hearings recently, the FBI used bleachBit to purge the server so the information could never be accessed in the future and used hammers to smash the cell phones involved. In other words, the FBI and DOJ participated in the destruction of the evidence. In effect, this constitutes is a conspiracy between the Obama DOJ (under Loretta Lynch) and the Comey-led FBI to cover up Clinton’s crimes.
Shortly thereafter, Comey came out publicly and held a press conference exonerating Clinton from any criminal activity, knowing full well that she was never thoroughly investigated, and that his own agency had participated in the destruction of evidence.
To reiterate Comey’s assertions, he stated that Clinton had been "extremely careless" in her handling of classified and sensitive information, but not "grossly negligent", even though the definition of grossly negligent is extremely careless. Gross negligence is the language in the statute necessary to prosecute someone who does this and Comey inaccurately professed that no prosecutor would pursue a case based on these facts, even though those with lesser evidence have indeed been charged.
Currently, there are investigations taking place pertaining to the Clinton email scandal cover-up, as well as the origins of the Trump investigation by the Mueller team, including the roots of the FISA applications. All of the documents uncovered by the ACLJ’s legal win will constitute valuable evidence for AG Bill Barr, the IG and others. Many who follow what is really going on, on a day to day basis have been repeatedly disappointed in the biased and one-sided investigations and the cover-up or blatant disregard of critical facts implicating the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump teams. But Bill Barr and his team are fairly new to the process. He and others, including John Durham, will finally have the opportunity to get to the bottom of all this --- and finally disclose the real collusion, corruption, and obstruction. There’s still hope.
Hey DEms...NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!! Remember!!
OK, it’s official. Hillary Clinton has been completely forgotten, nobody cares any more.
No matter how much ‘evidence’ or documentation gets produced, NO ONE involved will pay for the crimes committed.
Good thing there was another shooting to keep this out f the headlines
Ruh Roh! BREAKING BOMBSHELL EXPLOSIVE new info that will end the Trump presidency. Or something.
The FIB sucks.
The FBI acted as Hillary’s henchmen.
Wray needs to go so a thorough housecleaning can take place.
He and others, including John Durham, will finally have the opportunity to get to the bottom of all this -— and finally disclose the real collusion, corruption, and obstruction.
There’s still hope.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unlikely we will ever see the truth exposed because it would inevitably expose the Kenyanesian Usurpation and BOTH parties complicity in violating the Constitution.
This just confirms what we know, FBI and Hillary and Comey all crooked AND that no prosecutions will ever come out of this corruption.
Always more info. Always more details. We know she is a blatant criminal who was helped by criminals. But nothing is going to happen.
Not in this life.
Agree with yall....
‘...No one involved will pay...’
‘...there was a shooting ... out (o)f the headlines...’
Not quite reichtag fire level, but maybe close?
.02
KYPD
Bill Barr said during his confirmation that he took the job to protect the DOJ as an institution.
There has been and will be no housecleaning.
huh.. was this the story they wanted to bury with the shootings?
Could this be considered racketeering? RICO?
But they say They Are The Law"
Hillary Clinton’s strategy is to delay and live rich until she is dead or a Democrat she can control takes over.
There are a multitude of people protecting her.....feminists, Press, entertainers, professors, the rich, homosexuals, minorities.
She is using them all, and I mean “using” in the worst definition.
She tells the feminists they need to protect her because her crimes are really feminist issues.
She tells the minorities they need to protect her because her crimes are really minority issues.
She tells the press and the rich they must protect her because her crimes could cost them money.
Hillary tells them,
“Help me from going to jail for my crimes because it helps you!”
And foolishly, they become accomplices.
Ann, when dems say that (NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!) - they mean Trump and Trump's base are not above the law.
They do NOT mean that they're not above the law. Because liberal elites ARE above the law.
Democrats run Sanctuary Cities... that's a statement of being above the law. Democrat back illegals coming into our country. That's above the law. Democrats block ICE from doing their job - that's acting above the law.
Teddy Kennedy killed a woman and walked away from the dead woman and was above the law.
Bill Clinton raped several women and nothing happened.
Hillary Clinton passed around classified information and nothing happened... the thugs in the FBI helped her destroy evidence.
THEY - democrats ARE above the law ... 'The law' - whatever the hell that term means - is used to punish Trump and middle class Americans. WE ARE BECOMING A THIRD WORLD HELLHOLE without protection of law.
It's time to divided the country into Right and Left... liberal and conservative... NOT on race but on ideology.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.