much easier to arrange in the US...
Posted on 09/01/2019 9:12:31 AM PDT by RummyChick
Two directors of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's foundation have quit their roles, including a former advisor to Hilary Clinton, documents reveal.
Harry and Meghan have lost a string of workers, including private securities, a bodyguard, personal assistant and nannies to baby Archie.
But now official records show head of communications Sara Latham and director Natalie Campbell resigned just 53 days into their posts at Sussex Royal.
Companies House documents show both workers, two of Meghan's so-called 'wise women' left their posts with the charitable foundation on August 22.
Buckingham Palace has refused to comment on the resignations, but a royal source claims the pair were only given director status temporarily for legal reasons and now they are no longer directors - but still have the same job and remain employed by the Sussexes.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Prince harry is a mess.
Now they are wanting to come to LA
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7415377/Are-Harry-Meghan-moving-Malibu-Homesick-princess-hunting-house.html
Half-black privilege.
When will Me-gan have her “accident?”
Except for the Queen, the royals are becoming a standing joke.
Prince William and Kate doing pretty well.
Camilla seems to have become accepted by the public which is quite suprising.
But Andrew and MeAgain/Harry are a joke.
Charles will always be one that should be skipped over.
UGH...King Charles
One of our Freepers (naturalman1975) knows Charles and says he's pretty good guy.
I wonder does Charles really buy all the green nonsense he spews? Were he king, would he defend the faith?
She’s a trainwreck. She’s having a hard time getting back into pre-baby shape. That was one of her “selling points”.
By “green nonsense,” do you mean his stand on environmentalism, or on Islam?
Now they are wanting to come to LA
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Something along the lines of “birds of a feather ...” comes to mind.
Heh! Both.
She seems to conduct herself with decorum and manners. She avoids controversy and does not try to attract attention to herself. She's a mature woman, and seems to know her role well. I've never seen a good explanation of why She and Charles didn't marry when they first met (and dated) in the early 1970s.
I think the view is taking hold that Diana, whose youth, beauty and naivete first grabbed people's attention, was also childish, emotionally immature and passive-aggressive. Certainly, it would take a truly exceptional character to be plucked as a teen from obscurity and placed into the cold and calculating world of the Royal Family.
whether you think these reasons are good cause..here are some of the reasons
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/a20721800/why-prince-charles-didnt-marry-camilla-first/
much easier to arrange in the US...
As soon as they find another Henri Paul driver, I suppose.
Heh.
Enjoy the rest of your life, Harry.
The English Monarchy is and always will be inherently racist. They have not and never will accept this half breed ghetto mutt.
he should have been with Camilla from the beginning. and i admit, not a Diana fan.
Harry married crazy. She wants a home in California that she’ll get after the divorce. Wait for it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.