Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FLASHBACK: New York Times Opposed Impeachment Threats When They Thought Hillary Would Win
pjmedia.com ^ | 9/30/2019 | matt margolis

Posted on 10/01/2019 8:54:15 AM PDT by bitt

Before the election of 2016, Hillary Clinton’s illegal mishandling of classified information was a hot topic of conversation. By hosting her email on a private, unsecure server, she was violating several laws regarding the mishandling of classified information, and by deleting her emails that were under subpoena she was obstructing justice. Less than a week before the election, the New York Times Editorial Board wrote a scathing piece blasting Donald Trump and Republicans for the “particularly bizarre and dangerous tactic” of “warning that they may well seek to impeach Hillary Clinton if she wins, or, short of that, tie her up with endless investigations and other delaying tactics.”

“Of all the arguments advanced by the Trump forces, this has to be among the most preposterous,” they wrote, “In effect, what they’re saying is, Mrs. Clinton won’t be able to govern, because we won’t let her. So don’t waste your vote on her. Vote for us.”

“The tactic is a rejection of the nation’s need of a functioning government,” they continued. Well, isn’t that interesting? Ah, but there’s more. They called the strategy “nonsensical” and said that these threats “could cause real damage by encouraging Republicans in the next Congress to effectively take the government hostage, exacting revenge by making sure that nothing Mrs. Clinton proposes ever comes to pass.” Wow, that sounds an awful lot like what Democrats are doing to Trump right now.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hrc; impeachment; nyt

1 posted on 10/01/2019 8:54:15 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 10/01/2019 8:54:30 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

NOTE
<><> Andrii Telizhenko, was then a political officer at Ukraine’s embassy ... dont know what he does now.
<><> Chalupa was a contractor hired by the DNC during the 2016 election.

Over lunch at a Washington restaurant, Chalupa told Telizhenko in stark terms what she hoped the Ukrainians
could provide the DNC and the Clinton campaign......... according to his account.

“Chalupa said the DNC wanted to collect evidence that Trump, his organization and Manafort were
(A) Russian assets, (B) working to hurt the U.S. and (C) working with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin against the U.S. interests.

“Chalupa indicated if we could find the evidence they would introduce it in Congress in September
and try to build a case that Trump should be removed from the ballot, from the election,” he recalled.

FEC records show Chalupa’s firm, Chalupa & Associates, was paid $71,918 by the DNC during the 2016 election cycle.


3 posted on 10/01/2019 8:55:44 AM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

How do these ugly, vile cheats even look themselves in the mirror?


4 posted on 10/01/2019 8:56:29 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson