Skip to comments.Elizabeth Warren's Viral Response to Men Against Same-Sex Marriage: "Just Marry One Woman ..."
Posted on 10/11/2019 5:41:39 AM PDT by karpov
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts had harsh words for those against marriage equality at the CNN LGBTQ Equality Town Hall on Thursday night.
In a clip now going viral, Morgan Cox, the chair of the Human Rights Campaign's board of directors, asked Warren about what she'd say to someone against same-sex marriage.
"Let's say you're on the campaign trail," Cox said.
"I have been!" Warren replied, to laughs.
"A supporter approaches you and says, 'Senator, I'm old-fashioned, and my faith teaches me that marriage is between one man and one woman.' What is your response?" Cox continued, affecting a southern accent for the hypothetical supporter.
"Well, I'm going to assume it's a guy who said that. And I'm gonna say, 'Then just marry one woman. I'm cool with that,'" Warren replied, to rapt applause. She then paused, and continued, "Assuming you can find one."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Conservatives tend to marry and produce children. Sodomy produces nothing but AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea, and other diseases, so homosexuals must propagandize their perversions to our children to recruit new members.
Pocahontas => “Fauxcahontas”.
what should be more viral is the way she and the audience applauded the supposedly ‘trans’ 9 year old. disgraceful, starting with the mother
Over the course of the past 10 years or so, the radical homosexual agenda has changed me from a “live and let live” kind of a person, to one who now opposes their perversion. They have radicalized me.
So Warren thinks a woman wouldn’t be for marriage between a man and a woman?
Damn if conservatives weren’t addicted to their political opioid of outrage they would ask if a Warren admin would discriminate against Muslims who believe that marriage is between man and woman.
“Then just marry one woman”
But when she gets too old for you cheat on her with a younger one and then divorce the first one and marry the second one and then divorce the second one and marry a third one.
Cause NO women support traditional marriage.
What a maroon!
On this issue, she is not wrong. If marriage was an unbreakable societal bond, gays would not want it.
She’s about as funny as a fart in a space suit.
Does her husband ever go with her on the trail?
Of course we see that sort of thing very often in TV commercials. The men who appear in those commercials must either be Pajama Boy types or just really need the money.
Humans are unique among animals who can tolerate carbohydrates. Cows and goats have four stomacks. Horses and rhinos have extremely large intestines. Humans have single small digestive systems, but release two chemicals into our digestive systems ......DPPIV and zonalin. DPPIV digests carbohydrate proteins slowly in the small intestines. Zonulin makes the small intestinal walls porous so that undigested intestinal lumen spills into the lymph and blood systems. The food proteins, bacteria and viruses contained in the lumen make us sick.
Strange, why would zonulin be needed if it harms us? Male deer have antlers which lock together in rut, and kill over-populations of bucks. Humans have leaky guts and use viral epidemics to kill off over-populations. What spreads these viruses? Male homosexuality.
Homosexual privilege advocates claim that homosexuality is inborn, that it’s part of their DNA. They are correct. It is part of their DNA. But it’s part of everybody’s DNA. Only the perverted deviants sucker into it.
Wow, who knew Warren’s wit was Algonquin Round Table worthy? /s
Marriage is the term signifying a sacred institution. Homos can have equal rights with a civil union.Objective concepts exist and matter.
All women are men hating, baby murdering lesbians.
Thats how she knows that a heterosexual male wont be able to find one!
Man hater Elizabeth Warren
“Muslims who believe that marriage is between man and woman.”
No, Muslims believe that marriage is between a man and up to four women, any one of whom he can either plow or beat depending on her submissiveness.
How is this witty, clever or, as Newsweek puts it, “harsh”? It’s just stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.