Skip to comments.Ivanka Trump on Impeachment Whistleblower: ‘It’s Not Particularly Relevant’
Posted on 11/08/2019 11:24:44 AM PST by Steve1999
Ivanka Trump, the presidents daughter, echoed her fathers view of the impeachment inquiry, saying it is an attempt to overturn the 2016 election. But she said that the identity of the whistleblower at the center of the controversy isnt important. The whistleblower shouldnt be a substantive part of the conversation, she told The Associated Press, because that person did not have firsthand information.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Correct. It is much larger than that now. Even Trump GOP hire-ees have provided deeper cannon fodder, it is past the tipping point. Whistleblower is just a distraction, a small fry and was only a mere spark. It solves nothing going after him or her. And when NSC Bolton finally dues testify its probably all she wrote, Katy bar the door but we shall see.
That makes the WB....a leaker.
Eric the Whistle Leakerleaker made himself relevant when he decided to be the catalyst to launch the faux impeachment inquiry. To that extent he should be scrutinized for any anti-Trump feelings, sayings, or actions, and the multiple-people he claims told him about the phone call.
He lied his ass off saying Trump stated a quid pro quo 8 separate times in the phone call, proved completely false with the transcripts. He lied his ass off saying Trump declared the withheld military aid would not be delivered unless the Ukranian president investigated the Bidens.
So either the Eric the Whistle Leakerwas lying or his sources were lying. The Senate needs to drag his weak ass through a tough questioned investigation and grill him under some hot lights.
Ivanka you ignorant slut, Eric the Whistle Leaker is anything but “not relevant” in this. He is THE CATALYST FOR IMPEACHMENT. He needs to be raked over the coals for everything he knows and publicly expose everything about him that is anti-Trump. Fry his ass.
Step away from the bong.
“Whistleblower is just a distraction”
The origination of his plan, and those he coordinated with are still very important.
When America sits in judgement of a President, bias and partisanship matter to the judgement of justice.
And it WILL be America that sits in judgement if this goes to Senate trial.
Don’t kid yourself. Ivanka, et-al have had lots of planning sessions, work groups and “what-if” strategy meetings. This strategy didn’t drop off the top of her head onto her tongue. Nothing anybody in DC says is just off the cuff. It is all output from planning and strategy meetings.
There is a reason they are taking this position. It could be a defensive move, or an offensive move. I just like to watch the game and avoid kibitzing at this point. I know Trump’s track record on this stuff. I’m not concerned.
Ivanka needs to go home and make some babies.
Unfortunately, President Trumps pride and joy is more often wrong than right.
Ivanka has a cultured, pretentious voice and speaking manner, so whenever shes asked to comment on politics, I cringe
I’m shocked she’s not defending the Deep State / Fake News Media on this. She is a member in good standing with them, despite being Trump’s daughter.
What is relevant is WHO wrote the whistleblower’s complaint, and how the whistleblower was recruited and managed by the dems. He is a key piece in proving the partisan hit job. He needs to be questioned under oath.
If Ivanka Trump actually said this, she is dead wrong.
You need to read the article because she talks about how the attacks have been there, against the whole family, from the beginning and defends her dad the President....
“Im shocked shes not defending the Deep State / Fake News Media on this.
Maybe she is, in her own subtle way. She is downplaying the genesis of the coup. When it’s critical to know everything about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.