Posted on 12/08/2019 11:45:49 AM PST by Kaslin
A more accurate analogy would be “the neighbor’s cousin’s barber said”.
Nadler is frankly a pissant and ignorant for even a pissant.
I want to be on this Jury.
14 Term Congressman....
27 years in DC
A PROFESSIONAL Swamp creature.
On hearsay evidence? And 2nd and 3rd hand at that?
I know politicians have to speak to their base, especially when their policy has been implemented, but sometimes politicians say the dumbest things.
He’s probably right with a Washington DC jury.
There is no direct evidence. If there was it would be laid out in an actual articles of impeachment. Nadler is parasitic wart on a diseased toads bottom.
“Nadler Argues Dems’ Impeachment Case Is So Strong That a Jury Would Convict in ‘Three Minutes Flat’”
************************************************************
OK. I’m convinced. Absolutely convinced I tell ya.
...a comfortable victory, in BOTH the electoral vote and popular vote,...
_____________________________________________________________
31 prog critters are named in a poll that shows they will be defeated if they vote for this charade.
One of them is mine: Ron Kind. I am amazed. Ron gets most of his funding from out of state, does very little and carries the prog water, no matter what. The largest cities in his District (WI-3)(La Crosse and Eau Claire) are blue islands in a sea of red.
There has been NO SALE of this kangaroo court show.
...keep their based fires up...
_______________________________________
Besides the 31 endangered prog critters, 24% of Trump rally attendees are D voters.
That ‘base’ is shrinking fast.
Perhaps like the House, the Senate can make up its own rules...
Per the article, the evidence is there...But its being kept hidden by Trump's refusal to let Naddles see it...Therefore its obstruction of Congress and abuse of power of the Presidency...Might sell good on CNN and MSNBC...
He could feed a town if burned at the stake
And there was solid evidence in the Russia fiasco too. Of course, we found out then, as will be the case here, not so much.
The standard isn’t wether the impeaching party abandons or supports. The standard is bipartisan support. The ONLY bipartisan position at this point is not to impeach. If this were a case built on an overwhelming amount of evidence two things would happen. Some Republicans would support impeachment and the polls would reflect that there is compelling evidence!
And here I thought Humpty-Dumpty was just a fictional children’s story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.