Posted on 12/20/2019 7:59:08 AM PST by fwdude
“...agreeing with gay adoptions.”
Suggested change: “...agreeing with homosexual adoptions.”
“adaption” is not mentioned in the article so why is it in the title?
As I remember, it was a story about a little boy getting adopted by his two queer dads. He was so happy. His teacher told him he should NOT be happy. That being in a homosexual household was wrong.
I think the teach was fired. The argument at FR was about the teacher being out of line (she was). But it also escalated to include the little boy was right to be glad. That while not perfect - having two dads was better than having no dads.
I’m gonna keep looking for that thread.
OMG Pubbie. You were right. It was locked!
“Enough”
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3797701/posts
I thin that happened about 2 weeks ago in Utah.
I really wonder how many of those pro-gay parents arguing in the thread were actually lurking leftist trolls
And a high percentage of children in homosexual adoptions are mentally, physically, sexually assaulted
“Others looked at the long term damage done to such a child and argued under no circumstances should a child EVER be placed with sodomites.”
They are a threat to the children. Some of the most horrific abuse of children has happened because of allowing this.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/couple-offered-son-to-paedophiles-20130630-2p5eg.html
One of the more vocal pro-gay Freepers was a kid.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3797701/posts?page=73#73
link.
bump
Been waiting for a good thread to ask this question.... What % of US Gen pop is homo..?
Stop giving them little boys to bugger.
I call it same-sex mirage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.