Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin court blocks purging of more than 200,000 voters from rolls
The Hill ^ | 01 14 2020 | John Kruzel

Posted on 01/14/2020 12:11:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen

A Wisconsin state court of appeals on Tuesday put on hold a ruling requiring the urgent removal of more than 200,000 names from the state’s voter rolls, the latest twist in a closely watched legal fight playing out in the battleground state ahead of the 2020 election.

The ruling comes after a lower court judge last month ordered the purging of roughly 234,000 people from voter rolls because they may have moved, and a day after the state's elections commission and several of its members were found in contempt of court for not complying with the removal order.

The latest development represented a win for Democrats in a state that may help decide the 2020 contest, and which President Trump won by fewer than 23,000 votes in 2016.

The lawsuit challenging the rolls was brought by the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty on behalf of several Wisconsin voters. The group claims the state elections commission should have immediately deactivated voters who didn’t respond within 30 days to a mailing sent in October, an indication that the person may have moved, say the litigants.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2020; annjacobs; jennifernashold; joannekloppenburg; judgepaulmalloy; judiciary; julieglancey; markthomsen; michaelfitzpatrick; paulmalloy; politicaljudiciary; voterfraud; voterrolls; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Arrrrggg.
1 posted on 01/14/2020 12:11:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Democrat judges block purge. You knew this was coming.

Democrat cheating and fraud is a constitutional entitlement.


2 posted on 01/14/2020 12:12:51 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

These things need to proceed to the Supreme Court for a ruling. This is pathetic that people that no longer live in the state can influence an election in that state.


3 posted on 01/14/2020 12:15:01 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
A Wisconsin state court of appeals Democrats

Much better...

4 posted on 01/14/2020 12:17:36 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

like they corrupt, clearly corrupt, FISA court,
this court KNOWS of crime and permits it,
encourages it.

each corrupt judge must be impeached and their pensions
taken, and then imprisoned.


5 posted on 01/14/2020 12:17:40 PM PST by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

DemocRATs (Commies, really) just LOVE Voter Fraud. It is the life blood of their “party”.


6 posted on 01/14/2020 12:18:18 PM PST by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Not fair to Demonrats. They need fraud and dead voters to win against them evil Republicans. What would we do without these judges protecting and preserving Demonrat voter fraud ?

7 posted on 01/14/2020 12:19:21 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Dear Mr. Kotter, #Epsteindidntkillhimself - Signed, Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

They are required by Federal Law!


8 posted on 01/14/2020 12:21:06 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster

“This is pathetic that people that no longer live in the state can influence an election in that state.”

That’s okay....they just bus them up to vote democrat from their new homes in Chicago. It’s an easy $50.


9 posted on 01/14/2020 12:22:56 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
We are a nation of laws appointed judges.
10 posted on 01/14/2020 12:25:03 PM PST by Sans-Culotte (With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS


11 posted on 01/14/2020 12:25:49 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Democrat judges block purge. You knew this was coming.

Those smug little *bleeps* always get their way.

12 posted on 01/14/2020 12:27:05 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Well, I was hopeful.

Still not giving up. And I’ll guarantee that President Trump wins Wisconsin - AGAIN - and by an even wider margin than last time. KAG! :)


13 posted on 01/14/2020 12:39:04 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Wisconsin Ct. of Appeals District IV (Madison, aka Moscow on Lake Mendota).


14 posted on 01/14/2020 12:41:01 PM PST by myerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Win elections through fraud. That is the Democrat way. This will be the suicide of the US.


15 posted on 01/14/2020 12:44:02 PM PST by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Democrats...
The reason we can’t have nice things...
16 posted on 01/14/2020 12:52:25 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump didn’t want an AG, he wanted a consigliere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: myerson

The decision blocking the purge of the voter rolls was issued by District 4 Court of Appeals Judges Michael Fitzpatrick, JoAnne Kloppenburg and Jennifer Nashold. The same judges had twice previously declined to stop the purge.

They wrote that they issued the order quickly because they knew the commission was meeting Tuesday. They will spell out their reasoning in a later opinion, they wrote.

Separately, Fitzgerald issued a decision halting the contempt finding because Ozaukee Circuit Judge Paul Malloy’s original decision has been blocked.


17 posted on 01/14/2020 12:53:26 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ActresponsiblyinVA

Yep, and also a way to sway public opinion to ditch the Electoral College since they can show how many more “votes” the democrat got... doesn’t matter that the majority were from a handful of big cities.


18 posted on 01/14/2020 12:58:32 PM PST by Phillyred (Kieran Hussie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Complete BS.


19 posted on 01/14/2020 1:01:30 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This is how we’re losing our Republic.


20 posted on 01/14/2020 1:07:50 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson