Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nadler: ‘We Heard from Enough Witnesses to Prove the Case Beyond Any Doubt’
Breitbart ^ | 01/15/2020 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 01/16/2020 6:11:33 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: bob_esb

Let the games begin. Hopefully, President Trump and his team will not disappoint. No quarter.


41 posted on 01/16/2020 7:34:13 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

LOL!


42 posted on 01/16/2020 7:34:20 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bob_esb

What a coinkydink that some government “workers” reached this opinion today. Hmmmm.


43 posted on 01/16/2020 7:35:12 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Then why do they need more witnesses? Just present the “mountain of evidence” and it is all over. Simple.


44 posted on 01/16/2020 7:37:19 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Regardless what the witnesses say about the articles, the articles are not impeachable offenses, full stop. It only validates what we already know, that the commies don’t give a wit about the Constitution since they just trashed the impeachment clause.


45 posted on 01/16/2020 7:37:50 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bob_esb

Crap - here go the RINOs - this was planned all along
____________________________________
This is a boom, which makes you wonder what other incoming is on the way.


46 posted on 01/16/2020 7:41:35 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

47 posted on 01/16/2020 7:45:38 AM PST by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If they heard from their witnesses, why won’t Nadler and company present them to the Senate?

Why do they need more? This is whom they used to impeach Trump.

And if their case is beyond a doubt, why did the Democrats sit on it for a month?


48 posted on 01/16/2020 7:48:55 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This guy’s gotta be on crack?!


49 posted on 01/16/2020 7:54:19 AM PST by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Remember they were telling us it was it urgent to impeach Trump because of the imminent threat he posed to the Republic.

After he was impeached, all the sense of urgency suddenly disappeared.

The Democrats’ central argument for removing Trump is gone.


50 posted on 01/16/2020 7:54:25 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

No its hearsay just like we saw in the House. The opposite has been verified.


51 posted on 01/16/2020 7:59:03 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the daitbe decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

That Koolaid is the bomb, is it not, NadlerIdiot?


52 posted on 01/16/2020 8:11:39 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yeah, Bozo, I’d like to put you on the witness stand while hooked up to a lie detector.


53 posted on 01/16/2020 8:28:27 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27; Liz

Chuckles deeply saddened.


54 posted on 01/16/2020 8:55:27 AM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

“...last time I checked they had ZERO Direct Evidence or Testimony, only triple hearsay and presumptions by people that were NOT THERE.”

True, and even if they did have evidence, it’s NOT a crime for a President to withhold aid from a country known for corruption, pending proof that said corruption is being properly investigated.

The only thing that could possibly incriminate President Trump is if he was caught on tape boasting that he used the authority of his office to influence a Ukrainian investigation for personal reasons.

And who would be stupid enough to do that?


55 posted on 01/16/2020 3:32:26 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Nadler is still operating in the "yesteryear" of politics.

You say what isn't true and a certain amount of non-thinking Americans will BELIEVE what you said.

Because of the Internet "yesteryear" politics have already faded into the sunset.

56 posted on 01/16/2020 4:47:51 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Only an enemy of the US state would bring false charges against its commander in chief.


57 posted on 01/16/2020 8:20:22 PM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson