Posted on 01/16/2020 6:11:33 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Let the games begin. Hopefully, President Trump and his team will not disappoint. No quarter.
LOL!
What a coinkydink that some government “workers” reached this opinion today. Hmmmm.
Then why do they need more witnesses? Just present the “mountain of evidence” and it is all over. Simple.
Regardless what the witnesses say about the articles, the articles are not impeachable offenses, full stop. It only validates what we already know, that the commies don’t give a wit about the Constitution since they just trashed the impeachment clause.
Crap - here go the RINOs - this was planned all along
____________________________________
This is a boom, which makes you wonder what other incoming is on the way.
If they heard from their witnesses, why wont Nadler and company present them to the Senate?
Why do they need more? This is whom they used to impeach Trump.
And if their case is beyond a doubt, why did the Democrats sit on it for a month?
This guy’s gotta be on crack?!
Remember they were telling us it was it urgent to impeach Trump because of the imminent threat he posed to the Republic.
After he was impeached, all the sense of urgency suddenly disappeared.
The Democrats central argument for removing Trump is gone.
No its hearsay just like we saw in the House. The opposite has been verified.
That Koolaid is the bomb, is it not, NadlerIdiot?
Yeah, Bozo, I’d like to put you on the witness stand while hooked up to a lie detector.
Chuckles deeply saddened.
...last time I checked they had ZERO Direct Evidence or Testimony, only triple hearsay and presumptions by people that were NOT THERE.
True, and even if they did have evidence, its NOT a crime for a President to withhold aid from a country known for corruption, pending proof that said corruption is being properly investigated.
The only thing that could possibly incriminate President Trump is if he was caught on tape boasting that he used the authority of his office to influence a Ukrainian investigation for personal reasons.
And who would be stupid enough to do that?
You say what isn't true and a certain amount of non-thinking Americans will BELIEVE what you said.
Because of the Internet "yesteryear" politics have already faded into the sunset.
Only an enemy of the US state would bring false charges against its commander in chief.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.