Skip to comments.
Tennessee appeals judges say it's OK to make creepy videos of women without their consent
USA Today / MSN ^
| 5-12,20
| Jamie Satterfield, Knoxville News Sentinel
Posted on 05/12/2020 11:21:03 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
To: rlmorel
Thanks for responding on this. Sometimes, I feel that I am the only one who sees it that way. So, thanks. You're not the only one. I suspect that all of us can think back to our childhood and remember an adult who was not family that made a difference in our lives, if only from their encouragement or a smile when it was needed. The fear that is being beaten into children these days is removing our ability to share that precious gift of kindness with those around us. Kindness is a gift that anyone can give.
41
posted on
05/13/2020 10:31:14 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
To: Rastus
No, the article isn’t trying to be confusing. It’s confusing because of the story itself: The guy is a deviant who’d been exposing himself, etc. But, the judges ruled that this one thing he did - filming women in public - was legal, even though he was getting up close and zeroing in on certain body parts without the women’s consent.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson