Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Supreme Court upholds 2013 large-capacity gun magazine ban as constitutional
thedenverchannel.com ^ | last updated 10:40 AM, Jun 29, 2020 | Blair Miller

Posted on 06/29/2020 11:12:08 AM PDT by real saxophonist

Colorado Supreme Court upholds 2013 large-capacity gun magazine ban as constitutional

By: Blair Miller

DENVER – The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the state’s ban on large-capacity gun magazines as constitutional in a ruling issued Monday nearly seven years after the law passed in the wake of the Aurora theater shooting.

“The legislation is a reasonable exercise of the police power that has neither the purpose nor effect of nullifying the right to bear arms in self-defense. Accordingly, the court affirms the judgment of the court of appeals,” Justice Monica M. Márquez wrote in the opinion.

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and other gun advocates in 2016 sued over the law, which banned gun magazines that hold more than 15 rounds, in 2016, arguing that Coloradans’ constitutional right to bear arms was violated by the magazine ban contained in House Bill 13-1224, which was passed by lawmakers and signed by then-Gov. John Hickenlooper in 2013.

The law, and others related to guns in Colorado, were passed after the 2012 Aurora theater shooting, in which the shooter used a large-capacity magazine and killed 12 people.

But RMGO challenged the law under Article II, Section 13 of the Colorado Constitution rather than the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, meaning that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling cannot be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The attorneys for the gun groups had argued that the law could be construed to “ban practically all detachable magazines,” as Márquez wrote. About half of the state’s sheriffs had filed briefs in support of overturning the ban, though law enforcement agencies are exempt from the law.

But she wrote in the court’s opinion, “We disagree. We conclude that Plaintiff’s interpretation of the definition of ‘large-capacity magazine’ is inconsistent with the provision’s plain text because it ignores the narrowing language, ‘designed to be readily converted to accept[] more than fifteen rounds of ammunition.”

“Because Plaintiffs do not challenge HB 1224 under the Second Amendment, we do not address whether the legislation runs afoul of the federal constitution. That separate question is simply not before us,” the court wrote.

A district court and the Colorado Court of Appeals both previously found that the law was constitutional, so the Supreme Court’s ruling upheld the court of appeals’ ruling.

“I’m encouraged to see the Supreme Court uphold the 2013 large capacity magazine ban,” said Rep. Tom Sullivan, D-Centennial, whose son was killed in the Aurora shooting. “Gun violence has ravaged our state and our nation, and I came to the legislature to work to put an end to it. Large capacity magazines like the 100 round drum that was used on the night my son Alex was murdered can cause devastating carnage and have absolutely no place on our streets. I’ll keep working day in and day out to fight the epidemic of gun violence.”

This is a developing story and will be updated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; colorado; hickenlooper; johnhickenlooper; magpul; secondamendment; selfdefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: nwrep

Look like a couple of cops I’m aware of in my home town.


41 posted on 06/29/2020 12:16:52 PM PDT by beelzepug (OCD and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Oh I don’t trust Roberts a little bit. But I do trust Thomas and Kavanaugh. And I know Alito and Gorsuch will go our way on 2A cases. And apparently Thomas and Kavanaugh believe they have a fifth vote or else they wouldn’t be demanding the Supreme Court take these cases.


42 posted on 06/29/2020 12:19:27 PM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

With mob rule from dingbats like these two, I am going to buy more 30 round magazines and give them to my dog who already owns dozens of them...


43 posted on 06/29/2020 12:22:00 PM PDT by Stayfree (Liberalism is an incurable mental disease caused by stupidity and ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

This needs to go to the USSC since they are banning protected armaments.


44 posted on 06/29/2020 12:42:36 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

BTW, few give a rats ass about this law. Guns stores routinely sell high capacity magazines. The law was written by liberals who are notorious imbeciles and it says if you already have them then you can keep them. This means since magazines do not come with a date stamp that all high capacity magazines are legal. I’ve bough multiple firearms with magazine capacities beyond the Colorado idiotic limit.


45 posted on 06/29/2020 12:44:17 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

Somewhere, Rachet Madcow is salivating.


46 posted on 06/29/2020 12:50:42 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading - T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

I would expect that outside of Denver and Boulder, this law is universally ignored.


47 posted on 06/29/2020 12:52:27 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading - T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

48 posted on 06/29/2020 12:58:46 PM PDT by real saxophonist (If you believe masks work, you also believe Santa Claus ate the Easter Bunny for dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Gee the Louisiana legislation was a reasonable exercise of the public safety which neither the purpose nor effect of nullifying the right to abort you baby. Requiring a Doctor to have Hospital Privileges which are granted to physicians based on their current medical credentials and previous performance would insure the safety of the patient.

BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOO................ safety for you!

49 posted on 06/29/2020 1:57:10 PM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Surprise, surprise,surprise.


50 posted on 06/29/2020 1:59:40 PM PDT by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

I’ve declared my home an autonomous zone. All magazines are welcome, even those few oddball stripper clips too. Just to show we’re all inclusive, firearms without detachable magazines such as shotguns are also welcome. Even firearms without magazines such as revolvers or break at the breach single and double barrel shotguns are welcome. Heck, I’ll even allow muzzle loaders.


51 posted on 06/29/2020 2:16:33 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allblues

Ahem....”domestic partner.”


52 posted on 06/29/2020 7:14:23 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
“The legislation is a reasonable exercise of the police power that has neither the purpose nor effect of nullifying the right to bear arms in self-defense. Accordingly, the court affirms the judgment of the court of appeals,” Justice Monica M. Márquez wrote in the opinion.

Where are "police powers" in the Constitution? Americans fought a war to get rid of that kind of thing.

Colorado revolt: 55 of 62 sheriffs refuse to enforce new gun laws

I think I'll go with "Sheriff's Powers" myself.

53 posted on 06/29/2020 7:54:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (Covid is over. We have been conditioned by it. The Cultural Revolution has begun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Some plastic mags do come with a date stamp right down to the day and hour of manufacture. I bought a bunch of plastic 20 rd. and 30 rd. SKS mags before the new law. That should actually help me if they ever tried to prosecute me.

It also means you could shop online or at gun shows specifically for pre-July’13 mags.

FWIW none of my steel mags have dates and your point is well taken on that.


54 posted on 06/29/2020 8:03:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (Covid is over. We have been conditioned by it. The Cultural Revolution has begun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Glocks have 100 round magazines available. $300.00 and I saw a 50 rounder on line for $$49.00 the other day.


55 posted on 06/30/2020 3:39:48 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
No more compromise. Challenge every law. Challenge every restriction. Roll it all back, including FOPA, GCA, NFA; everything. It’s time to take back every part of the Second Amendment that’s been taken from us.

The opportunity to do this has passed. Gun owners should've demanded this when the GOP controlled both the House and Senate. Instead, we were thanked for our steadfast and unwavering support with a bumpstock ban.

Now, California's ballot harvesting laws have ensured the GOP will likely never control the House again. So much for rolling back gun laws.

56 posted on 06/30/2020 3:58:52 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Well lawyers- put it before the court then

Probably should wait until Roberts is outnumbered first...

57 posted on 06/30/2020 4:09:38 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Congress is a fickle beast filled with sycophants and liars who will move whichever direction the general wind blows. They can’t be trusted past the next lunatic’s rampage.

What we need is President Trump getting one or two more picks in the Supreme Court. Landmark cases there last for generations. Hard and fast rulings striking down unconstitutional restrictions on the Second Amendment will echo in every legislative chamber and courtroom across the country for decades to come. Forget Congress. Every effort must be put into the President and the Supreme Court.


58 posted on 06/30/2020 4:11:25 PM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson