Posted on 08/22/2020 1:14:38 PM PDT by conservative98
“or now, in this country, you’re INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty in a court of law.....not by keyboard FR *attorneys*.”
_____________________
Do you think the same way about the Clintons?
If Snopes says a conservative group isn’t guilty, you can take it to the bank.
The Clintons haven’t even been indicted.
Let’s talk when that happens :)
Being a war hero doesn’t make you perfect or incorruptible.
The Wall Fund Bank records will prove or disprove his statement.
Also....the grifter Clintons were ‘dead broke’ when they landed in DC.
They created their Foundation and the foreign $$ have flown in.
They live like millionaires, after NEVER signing the FRONT of a paycheck....always off of the backs of gov’t and/or taxpayers.
Bannon has had previous successful businesses/jobs....and was already worth MILLIONS before he signed on with Kolfage.
I’m not saying Bannon is innocent, but I will suggest that we circle the wagons around our own....like the left always does, at least until he’s proven guilty.
Kolfage, I have NO idea about.
But, to compare Bannon to the Clintons, at this point? Unreal.
Why do you have such animus toward this man?
I read another thread and you already have him sentenced.
You are most likely a scumbag lawyer, all lawyers are scumbags, but innocent until proven guilty should mean something to even a dolt like you.
Go back to du you troll.
I actually like Bannon. He is the author of the America First nationalist theme in the Trump Administration.
That has nothing to do with crooks who steal money from hard working folks and siphon it into their bank accounts.
I have represented victims my entire career. I won’t apologize for that. Even to the fake conservatives and obnoxious jerks who don’t want to admit or even consider that one of their heroes is a grifter.
“Being a war hero doesn’t make you perfect or incorruptible.”
Understand, but it would be great if SDNY screwed up in this particular case.
You don’t pay cash for a $675K boat up front unless you’re at the very least a deca-millionaire and probably quite a bit more. And the chances of this gent getting to that point from a $100K insurance settlement a decade earlier aren’t great.
It is often useful to listen to what Trump says, because he often knowsmore than we do regarding specific situations.
And Trump said he didn’t like this project from the start because it was meant to embarrass him re: the wall. Is that true? If so, is it a continuation of this odd story about Kolfage in 2018 that goes back to a number of websites that he is alleged to have driven fake traffic to and presumably in part could have been put up as a dirty trick to make Trump look bad:
If he were doing that, that could help to explain his being flush with cash for an expensive boat—and Trump’s doubting his motives.
I really don’t know the story here, but I think it is worth at least considering what our president said on the issue this week.
The show he is part of on newsmax TV is very informative and has been laying to bare all the chicoms doings and I think this could be part of a payback for that.Would it surprise you if the SDNY was tied into the chicoms in some way? I wouldnt be surprised one bit.They are all liars/lawyers afterall.
American, triple-amputee veteran, indicted by corrupt Democrats? I assume they are all innocent, no matter what Trump or anyone on the right says.
Bannon made an estimated $31 million off the show "Seinfeld" alone.
Thanks, much for that link. Great story....and, explains how Bannon came into (al/some) of his existing millions.
FTA...
....Long before he became the chief strategist of Donald Trump’s White House and the executive chairman of Breitbart News, Bannon was an investment banker. After a stint at Goldman Sachs, he launched his own firm, Bannon & Co., in 1990.
Fast forward a few years. Bannon was brought in to help Westinghouse Electric negotiate a minority stake acquisition in Castle Rock Entertainment — the producer of the iconic Jerry Seinfeld comedy — a person familiar with the deal told TheWrap.
“As often happened with Turner, when it came time to actually close the deal, Ted was short of cash,” Bannon told Bloomberg in 2015. “Westinghouse just wanted out. We told them, ‘You ought to take this deal. It’s a great deal.’ And they go, ‘If this is such a great deal, why don’t you defer some of your cash fee and keep an ownership stake in a package of TV rights?’”
And that is exactly what he did. Bannon and his team accepted a stake in the royalties of five shows under the Castle Rock banner, one of which was “Seinfeld,” which was in its third season at the time. Bannon’s involvement with Westinghouse was not disclosed to Castle Rock Parters at the time, who dealt directly with Turner in the 1992 sale.
“We calculated what it would get us if it made it to syndication,” Bannon said. “We were wrong by a factor of five.”
Exactly how much Bannon has earned from his stake in the show is not readily available, but consider this: the Financial Times reported in 2013 that “Seinfeld” had earned $3.1 billion in reruns. Even at one percent, that would mean Bannon & Co. would have made over $31 million since the show went off the air.
..
Oh please. This is for headlines for the campaign. There will be leaks all over the place and Trump’s name will be wedged into every story.
#25. What a great group of surfboards. /sarc
Definitely! Wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it ended up being a witch-hunt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.