Posted on 09/29/2020 7:32:37 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
Yup.
Especially since the police have stood by while BLM/ANTIFA mobs looted, rioted and murdered at will, with no reaction whatsoever from the police. Why would the police send a massive twenty cop cars to a domestic dispute involving a man of high repute?
And did the police steal any Trump campaign papers, passwords etc while they where in the house?
Who actually directed this operation?
Why did the police first release a statement saying he was suicidal armed and violent during g arrest, when he clearly wasn't?
There was no resistance or violence whatsoever from Brad.
Police will enter the situation alerted and prepared for an armed encounter, with a possibly deadly physical force confrontation.
Such a situation requires that police entering into a certain amount of mental mind set.
A PSYCHOPS situation .
Also, possibly a bit of 'pre-divorce foreplay'.
I wrote about this issue in a reply to another Freeper yesterday regarding what I saw was totally Unnecessary violence on behalf of the Police.
Police are trained to Deescalate the incident to the best of their ability. In this case the Initial Police Officer on the Scene spoke to Parscale via phone and asked him to exit the house without weapons.
Parscale did as he was asked. He came out of the house wearing nothing but shorts. Carrying only a beer. He event pit the beer down so there was No reason to think he could have used that as a weapon.
Another reason to discount potential violent actions on behalf of Parscale was the fact that there was a SWAT team on the scene with M-16’s and I’m sure he saw them even in his inebriated state.
As the First Officer was Speaking to Parscale another Irresponsible Officer decided to Rush in on Parscale and tackle him from behind. Knocking him to the pavement and I’m sure causing unnecessary abrasions to his back and legs.
The office who took the Unnecessary action to Tackle Parscale is reason why the Public has very little faith in the mental stability of our Law Enforcement agencies.
That Officer needs to be counseled on what the word Deescalate means.Before he does something worse in the future.
Yes but Brad was standing in the street, in short pants and with no shirt, with no weapon whatsoever. And he offered zero resistance.
Where was the threat to the police at?
That ‘neighbor’ was his wife........not very modest
As the First Officer was Speaking to Parscale another Irresponsible Officer decided to Rush in on Parscale and tackle him from behind. Knocking him to the pavement and I’m sure causing unnecessary abrasions to his back and legs.
-
That POS cop should have been fired on the spot - as should the sub-moron who tased the woman seated with her family for not wearing a mask.
If the police want people to think well of them, maybe they can stop acting like Gestapo agents.
Earlier this year, police arrested a man playing ball with his son in a park, arrested a surfer who was surfing alone on a beach in California, removed basketball hoops at a park so no one could play, and harassed churchgoers in Mississippi. If they keep this up, conservatives will be joining the movement to defund police.
None that I saw.
No. Cops need to calm the @$%% down. It is time for them to stop going into every situation looking for somebody to kill. This is exactly the BS that’s why BLM exists. It ain’t just black people. Cops have decided it’s us or them and we always lose. Anybody that looks at a guy carrying NOTHING wearing only shorts and thinks “must act with violence” is a threat, and needs to be never allowed in any police force ever again.
“roughly manhandle him for no reason”
Didn’t his own wife report to police that he was armed with a pistol and suicidal? That’s two reasons police might need to “manhandle” him right there...
They look to be Memorex, yes?
“Bard Parscale says different. He kept saying, “I didn’t do anything” in this video.
Why would his wife fell the police he shot himself while he clearly didn’t?”
You. only represent the portion after the standoff.
Looking at the video he is clearly under duress.
Sure - how about, "it depends on the individual officer", or "it depends on supporting evidence"?
Let's modify your question a bit:
About trusting Doctors, can anyone here give me just One good reason why they should EVER BE BELIEVED about anything??
Law enforcement is a profession (like medicine). Does it really make sense to suggest that all members of some profession are untrustworthy?
(You might have better luck convincing me, if you suggest that all adherents to a specific ideology, like Communism or Islam, are untrustworthy, but even that's a stretch. And last I heard, "cop" wasn't a political party or religion... ;^)
So it's against the law to drink beer in your front lawn ?
“Why would his wife fell the police he shot himself while he clearly didn’t?”
Why would you say that she said that while clearly she didn’t?
Problem is the police are all in the same union, which backs them all regardless of behavior. You have to not trust any of them because there’s no way to know until the encounter is over which kind you’re dealing with. Are you dealing with a good calm cop, or are you dealing with a cop that will shoot unarmed people in the back? There may be many more of the former than the later, but the quantity of the later, and the fact that they almost always get away with it, means you simply cannot trust them. Not until they start to reform, the union starts pushing the bad ones out, they actually admit they have a problem.
To quote from post # 31 just above yours:
“Anybody that looks at a guy carrying NOTHING wearing only shorts and thinks “must act with violence” is a threat, and needs to be never allowed in any police force ever again”
“After Brad Parscale loaded the round, Candice Parscale “immediately fled residence and stated she heard a loud bang shortly after,” the report said. “
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.