Posted on 11/05/2020 7:53:44 AM PST by Hostage
the FBI is useless and incompetent
Article 1, Section 4
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Forget it Jake, it’s Chinatown
You might be right but mine looked like ordinary copy paper.
Article IV Section 1
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
Simply put, Congress must put rules in place to allow officials from one state to do the counting of votes in another state not their own.
Think of it as being like the final scene in the Kevin Costner movie The Untouchables when he swaps juries from another case.
We must make it so that there are no partisans in a state counting their own votes. Each state can have their own elections officials who count the votes in statewide races if they choose, but federal elections should be counted by officials from outside their own state, using the "full faith and credit" clause of the Constitution.
-PJ
TY, helpful.
And you’re right, 60 votes to end filibuster would kill any effort in Congress.
But an Article V amendment proposal of 34 voter referendums would get reform off the ground.
Are there 34 Red States? I think so.
> “Congress must put rules in place to allow officials from one state to do the counting of votes in another state not their own”
See #47.
Congress can’t be relied on.
Founders were concerned Congress would develop into an aristocracy which it has.
The 60 vote threshold to end filibuster would put the kibosh on any election reform matter in Congress.
An Article V pathway does not rely on Congress or President or Governors. It relies on Red State voters and legislatures only.
Another thing that has occurred to me is to embed RFID tags in the ballots so that they can be checked in and out quickly. This doesn’t convey what has been voted on the ballot, just the existence of it as it passes through areas of the voting system- you would have to install gates in these facilities to detect the RFID tags as they go through them. This is commonly used now for door locks to secure buildings (ever use a name badge against a detector on the wall to unlock a door? Thats an RFID tagged name badge.) and for logistics monitoring and inventory control in warehouses. RFID tags are tiny. You could easily put 100 of them in the space of a postage stamp, and they cost very very little. You could of course remove the tags but doing so would damage the ballot - torn out spot would be obvious. Burnt spot would be obvious. Getting the ballot wet would have no impact on the RFID tag. You can also set alarm systems so that when these tags are detected unexpectedly walking out the door the alarm goes off - you’ve probably experienced a form of this at stores like Best Buy with their gated doorways.
Congress "may" get involved to put in place uniform rules for states counting the election results of other states, for instance, determining which state counts which other state.
-PJ
Thank you but aren’t you relying on states to cooperate? I can’t see that happening and it sounds like an amendment process.
The states and the People ultimately control the Constitution.
-PJ
I remember it also and have posted very similar information on Free Republic. It was sickening. The Dems kept finding a few more ballots that kept the election within the required recount up till the 3rd count. The third count Gregoire (sp) won and by law their is no further recounts possible.
Democrats cannot win in a fair election.
I can fill in some facts regarding the Gregoire-Rossi contested election. Yes, there was lots of vote fraud in several counties, mostly King Snohomish, and Pierce counties.
In Kind County, new ballots were found in storage rooms, personal vehicles, and a rental truck delivered a large number of boxes from a rented storage unit. There were many precincts where to vote totals greatly exceeded the number of registered voters.
On of the reasons the judge rejected the lawsuit contesting the election was because the state GOP did not allege election fraud in its complaint. Why not?
Here are just a few of the reasons. The outgoing Governor went to work for the law firm Davis-Wright-Tremaine. Guesss who the state GOP hired to litigate the election contest? That’s right, DWT. The state GOP did not want to win; it’s as simple as that.
I sent an email to the new Republican AG, Rob McKenna, asking why he was not investigating and prosecuting the vote fraud. He responded by saying he didn’t have the authority to investigate vote fraud. I then sent him a copy of the statute that authorized him to intervene and prosecute cases in any county of the state. I never got a response.
McKenna was a very good friend of Gregoire and he certainly wasn’t going to prosecute vote fraud if it would have harmed Gregoire’s election as governor. It was also widely known the McKenna had a personal goal of becoming the next Governor once Gregoire left office; and prosecuting vote fraud would have killed that possibility.
McKenna is corrupt as hell, and everyone who followed his actions as AG knows it.
Not even the military ones?
No counts should ever be released until all votes that will be counted HAVE BEEN COUNTED. They depend on that information to know how many they need.
They hate the fact that Trump did not pay his party dues, get in line and wait his turn.
Excellent if true. Do you have a source? Today is the first I have heard of this.
I find it hard to believe that the congressional dems would allow DHS to do this without a major fight. Additionally they would have put out the word to their orcs so they don't get busted and expose them.
I guess DHS could have done this without telling anyone (which be great) but I don't see how. Did the Government Printing Office produce the stock paper and require the states to use it? It's my understanding that the states have control of ballot printing.
Thank you. I did not know that about McKenna. He did do some good things for people during the mortgage meltdown but it was short-lived and half-baked. But some people remember he at least did more than the current Democrat AG Ferguson.
The takeaway is Western Washington’s populous counties are corrupt as Hell, the red counties don’t stand a chance. It’s sad because the state is as beautiful as a state can be. It had everything going for it and the Democrats have corrupted it.
> “Not even the military ones?”
I think military ballots are considered legitimate because they are absentee ballots.
Absentee ballots = real person requested and received
Mail-in Ballots = Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse on the voter rolls get a ballot which the local BLM fill out and mail in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.