Writ of quo warranto: How the election can be corrected AFTER inauguration

NOQ Report ^ | 01/20/2021 | JD Rucker

[matthew fuller]

This kind of post is what the “Bookmark” option was designed for. (Shown immediately following the “report abuse” option, and above reply 1.)

[MayflowerMadam]

“With a writ of quo warranto, the clock starts AFTER inauguration because it challenges a sitting government official’s authority to be in office based on actions, such as voter fraud, that aided in that situation.”

It’s absolutely perfect for this situation. I hope PDJT and his attorneys are drawing up the paperwork now. Of course, something would have to happen to the corrupt judges to make it feasible.

Put it out there for all the citizens to see.

[Jane Long]

Praying they are COMPETENT Constitutional attorneys.....like Mark Levin, etc.

[Jane Long]

Then....simply ignore....if you don’t subscribe to the theory.

Why the useless shaming?

[matthew fuller]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_vaU4cb7XU

Jesse, don’t go......

[RandallFlagg]

Question for anyone who might know.
I haven’t watched TV since 2008.
Has anyone put out the demographics of who voted for Biden?
Trump had his out pretty quick. Did Biden?
Just curious.

[MayflowerMadam]

Yes; competent is good — mandatory.

[Dr. Franklin]

It's absolutely perfect for this situation. I hope PDJT and his attorneys are drawing up the paperwork now. Of course, something would have to happen to the corrupt judges to make it feasible.

No, it's not perfect. The case must be filed in the District of Columbia. The judges in the D.C. Circuit have been hostile to Trump, especially Judge Sullivan. Apparently, there is a right to a trial by jury on the fact of the matter. It's been 20 years since a Dem failed to get 90% of the vote for president, and that was when John Kerry got only 89.18%. The plan is for Harris to quickly succeed Biden. So this means jurors from an overwhelmingly black federal district will be asked to remove the first African-American "president" for fraud. It needs to be done, but good luck with that.

Winning this case will require overwhelming evidence which is still being concealed beyond the subpoena power of the D.C. District Court. Again, this has never been used before to contest a presidential election, although theoretically possible. The fact that this remedy exists, exposes the absurdity of the laches defense in other courts, since they had no expectation of any repose for not running the elections properly. If it cares to, SCOTUS could recognize that fact in the cases still before it. As long as the possibility to remove Biden and Harris exists through quo warranto, those cases aren't moot, but Roberts is corrupt as sin.

What becomes obvious is that, there is a need to change either the jurisdiction for which court can hear a quo warranto action for POTUS, granting that court national jurisdiction for subpoenaing evidence and witnesses, or changing the area from which the jury is drawn. It furthers the case for returning much of D.C. to Maryland, give MD another congressman, but subtracting two electoral votes from the Dems.