Skip to comments.
Writ of quo warranto: How the election can be corrected AFTER inauguration
NOQ Report ^
| 01/20/2021
| JD Rucker
Posted on 01/20/2021 8:07:04 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 last
To: SeekAndFind
This kind of post is what the “Bookmark” option was designed for. (Shown immediately following the “report abuse” option, and above reply 1.)
141
posted on
01/21/2021 5:28:31 PM PST
by
matthew fuller
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Pr#3)
To: SeekAndFind
“With a writ of quo warranto, the clock starts AFTER inauguration because it challenges a sitting government official’s authority to be in office based on actions, such as voter fraud, that aided in that situation.”
It’s absolutely perfect for this situation. I hope PDJT and his attorneys are drawing up the paperwork now. Of course, something would have to happen to the corrupt judges to make it feasible.
Put it out there for all the citizens to see.
142
posted on
01/21/2021 5:32:28 PM PST
by
MayflowerMadam
(They HAD to kill somebody for their plan to work. RIP Ashli.)
To: MayflowerMadam
Praying they are COMPETENT Constitutional attorneys.....like Mark Levin, etc.
143
posted on
01/21/2021 5:33:36 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow. )
To: Magnatron; SeekAndFind
Then....simply ignore....if you don’t subscribe to the theory.
Why the useless shaming?
144
posted on
01/21/2021 5:35:01 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow. )
To: BiglyCommentary
145
posted on
01/21/2021 5:42:00 PM PST
by
matthew fuller
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Pr#3)
Question for anyone who might know.
I haven’t watched TV since 2008.
Has anyone put out the demographics of who voted for Biden?
Trump had his out pretty quick. Did Biden?
Just curious.
146
posted on
01/21/2021 5:43:11 PM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(Only a moronic, suicidal group would try a Great Purge 2021 on an armed American. We're ready!)
To: Jane Long
Yes; competent is good — mandatory.
147
posted on
01/21/2021 5:49:41 PM PST
by
MayflowerMadam
(They HAD to kill somebody for their plan to work. RIP Ashli.)
To: MayflowerMadam; RummyChick
It's absolutely perfect for this situation. I hope PDJT and his attorneys are drawing up the paperwork now. Of course, something would have to happen to the corrupt judges to make it feasible.
No, it's not perfect. The case must be filed in the District of Columbia. The judges in the D.C. Circuit have been hostile to Trump, especially Judge Sullivan. Apparently, there is a right to a trial by jury on the fact of the matter. It's been 20 years since a Dem failed to get 90% of the vote for president, and that was when John Kerry got only 89.18%. The plan is for Harris to quickly succeed Biden. So this means jurors from an overwhelmingly black federal district will be asked to remove the first African-American "president" for fraud. It needs to be done, but good luck with that.
Winning this case will require overwhelming evidence which is still being concealed beyond the subpoena power of the D.C. District Court. Again, this has never been used before to contest a presidential election, although theoretically possible. The fact that this remedy exists, exposes the absurdity of the laches defense in other courts, since they had no expectation of any repose for not running the elections properly. If it cares to, SCOTUS could recognize that fact in the cases still before it. As long as the possibility to remove Biden and Harris exists through quo warranto, those cases aren't moot, but Roberts is corrupt as sin.
What becomes obvious is that, there is a need to change either the jurisdiction for which court can hear a quo warranto action for POTUS, granting that court national jurisdiction for subpoenaing evidence and witnesses, or changing the area from which the jury is drawn. It furthers the case for returning much of D.C. to Maryland, give MD another congressman, but subtracting two electoral votes from the Dems.
148
posted on
01/23/2021 9:22:56 AM PST
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-148 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson