Posted on 02/13/2021 4:58:44 AM PST by Kaslin
The video tells us nothing we don’t already know, and says nothing the Deep State wants to hear. It is also impertinent to the charge.
Call me nuts but I think the fight should be taken up by petitioning... Joe Biden to order a full investigation.
Why? We saw why yesterday.
In the midst of all the Jan 6 2017 attempts to derail Trump’s certification by the Electoral College, one consistent thing was Biden banging the gavel and getting ever more angry. At his own side. At the people trying to block Trump’s legitimate confirmation.
If he was as bought as people think, why did he smack the Democrat challenges down so forcefully?
Maybe he’s watched this impeachment and has been reminded, he stood on the right side of history once. He isn’t as rabidly tribal as Pelosi or Clinton.
I’m probably out of step here but I think Biden and Trump do have something in common: a lot of what people blame on them has nothing to do with them at all because as much as they ran under Party banners, the party doesn’t own them.
Biden didn’t control what Antifa or BLM did last summer, any more than Trump controlled the mob on Jan 6th 2021. Biden doesn’t tolerate Trump Derangement Syndrome lunacy from Rats any more than Trump tolerates it from RINOs.
As the President, Biden has the authority to rip through all the denials, obfuscations and legal tricks that the Never Trumpers on both sides use to avoid even looking at the evidence.
If he genuinely wants to start rebuilding trust in the electoral process and address legitimate grievances, that’d be a worthwhile olive branch. If the Rats opposed it, it’d hurt them more than him.
Biden also has nothing to lose personally by it. If we can agree Trump had no influence over the protesters on Jan 6, would if be too difficult to accept that Biden had no influence over the mutts messing about with ballot boxes?
Biden did benefit from massive ballot fraud but did he personally invite it or incite it? Or were the rank and file Never Trumpers engaging in guerilla action at the behest of other commanders?
If Sanders or Clinton, rather than Biden, had contested the Nov election I’d be far more convinced that the conspiracy was led from the top.
If I were Biden I’d be very worried right now that Friday’s evidence suggests that the lessons learnt by the Never Trumpers after his denunciation of the shenanigans in 2017 resulted in a far bigger, but far more “undercover”, cross-party operation in 2020 that kept Biden completely out of the loop just in case he slammed his gavel on it.
I watched that video yesterday and near the end the really important evidence was introduced for the first time. That was the verification of every cyber intrusion into the Dominion software that was captured in real time on election night.
That is what our cyber warfare agency known as kracken captured and that is what Trump was referring to when he said we got them all. 11,000 pages of intrusions, most from China showing their identity, the location and how many votes were changed. This alone is sufficient to reverse the election and put Trump in the Whitehouse.
I seriously doubt the FBI had any knowledge of this whatsoever as they are a rogue agency and most certainly a target for takedown by Trump and military intelligence.
Closing remarks are today and Lindells is way to damn long and disjointed. Best one that sums up all the frauf in 16 mins is this one https://rumble.com/vdp7df-share-unmasked-have-we-uncovered-the-truth-about-the-2020-election.html
Unfortunately, Lindell included some obviously fraudulent data that was offered by a known fabulist in this presentation. Beyond this, as wonderful as the guy is, his presentation style is a credibility destroyer. It was pretty amazing to see him gesticulating as his witnesses were talking.. he looks like a mad man.
Lots of good points, but the whole is flawed and needs to be re-edited. It would be better to pick a credible talking head to present and for him to cameo intros or whatever every suits his ego. But, if he wanted the presentation to work with folks not already disposed to agree with him.. this one fell flat.
The only problem is that some of this data that you found so compelling is an obvious fraud.
Agreed, much better and tighter.. and all carefully fact checked
As a retired data analyst, among other hats, I’m reserving support for the report until the plan used to connect the data parts together is presented.
We’re dealing with shifting definitions for the same data elements found in the packets coming from the US, modified in foreign nations, then returned to the voting machines in US precincts. Once the packets left the US, they may have several intermediate ‘legs’ before reaching the target IP of a foreign player who can change the vote values. If a unique ‘vote ID’ is created by the malware in the US representing a distinct ballot, then merging the transactions by this ‘vote ID’ will pool all the transactions together by distinct ballots.
Then a second sort for each distinct ballot by time stamp will put things in chronological order.
Then comes the hard part - matching IPs to locations. Some locations may be unregistered and located on the Dark Web. And it gets dicey if an IP is among a group of IPs that share a common location, like a satellite location of a company HQ. But for the purposes of this exercise, the country of the location is all we need to infer foreign interference with our elections.
There should be a Machine Address Code (MAC id) that shows up on the last leg of a given ballot id that confirms it is a voting machine in the US. The trick is determining whether the program is actually on the last leg or not. Likely there will be multiple transactions with non-matching MACs, but these should be very few.
Every state should have a list of voting machines and their MACS in their purchase documentation. Likely this was not available to the Kraken Krew.
If the report is good, then we should be able to look up the NH aberrations for the machines involved. I haven’t seen where the entire dataset of reported votes has been made available to the public, though.
A FR post yesterday presented the attack on the spreadsheet of supposedly intercepted intrusions to change vote totals. On seeing the spreadsheets in Lindell’s video, I had doubts — seemed too good to be true and a bit too much like McCarthy waiving “lists” of communists. On the other hand, opponents of transparency are motivated to discredit Lindell and his presentation. I’d definitely be against submitting this as evidence in the impeachment trial. The data needs to be compared to known machines, if any can be found, that either corroborate or refute it. If Mary Fanning and/or Dennis Montgomery introduced bogus “evidence” into this mess, they need a ... comeuppance.
Mike Lindell’s ebullient style came across as him being excited about what the various experts had to say. He’s not a professional presenter, but he did let his witnesses say their piece, unlike many a pro. The content was all I cared about.
I have known for many decades that we had a government far more crooked than most of us have ever suspected but current events still seem overwhelming, I don’t think I ever imagined just how deep the swamp really is. I have outlived a doctor’s prognosis by six months but now I pray that I have not outlived any hope for what used to be the United States of America.
And just exactly what data was that? Please enlighten me.
Would you be surprised to learn that from the brief look at one page of the cyber docs in the video that relevant information appeared to be there? Have you viewed that segment of the video because if you have it seems that your question is answered. If you have not viewed the video then I would urge you to do so and then report back because it looked pretty comprehensive to me.
Obviously, it was the freest and fairest election ever. If not, the honest, hard working, agents who make up 99% of the FBI would blow the whistle.
... as it did to me as well. But no link to the entire dataset / spreadsheet, or I would have pulled it down. I just wanted to confirm the Wyndham County entries. I work with data elements, not expectations, and this report is from a complicated data transaction process which has not reported what data elements, exactly, and where in the process do these elements change? I made a best guess of the process in previous post, so I'm likely wrong in some presumptions. And those presumptions will kill you every time ...
Gatewaypundit
UNCOVERED: Conman With Long History of Deceit, Dennis Montgomery, Inserted False Information Into Election Fraud Investigation, Who’s Paying Him?
Read it and weep, I want to.
Yes but the info from the cyber warfare dept is really all you need as far as the dominion machines. It takes precedence. Trump said we got them all.
This may be so, but Lindell didn’t choose wisely. This stuff was being questioned heavily here on FR prior to this special being released.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
