Posted on 03/29/2021 4:48:47 PM PDT by little jeremiah
Example: If a private business requiring the passport is a large distributor for Publix, they could try to jack Publix into requiring the passport as well by refusing to distribute to them.
“But muh private businesses . . . “ What could possibly go wrong?
My Governor is great... DeSantis 2024
It’s all about tyranny.
It’s a giant Rorschach test.
Absolutely correct! I just had my third test in the last year and all have been NEGATIVE for the CHINA CCP VIRUS! I AM NOT GETTING THE DAMN VACCINE! AND I SHOULD NOT BE PENALIZE AND NOT BE ABLE TO FLY OR TRAVEL BECAUSE OF THAT - I HAVE A PASSPORT DAMN IT!!!!!!!!
Have you ever thought about what the sum total of your posts on this website comes to, in all your history?
Did you ever notice they have only one theme and one thought?
One theme, one thought.
As soon as Kay Ivy hears of this I am screwed.
Whaaaat? Are you serious? Don’t tell me that’s for real, they injected a chip into you? Whoa, no way am I allowing the to do that.
This is called consistency.
Yeah, I'll get right on that.
Meantime, since y'all hate us "beyond the trees" folks so much you ought not to
be posting threads outside of your Qtard pens. Ever.
You have removed yourselves from the community, and
trashed the community so you need to stay OUT of the community.
Humble is telling me I am not allowed to post on threads (that I myself posted, in this case). He says I am not allowed to post on any threads on FR other than the ongoing Q threads.
Could you clarify this?
Thank you.
I used the word "ought".
Do you understand "ought"?
Where did I use the word "allowed"?
Did you do some Q-decoding magic to find those words where they didn't exist?
And hey, nice job crying to teacher.
Super strong position, that.
a legitimate thread and you attack? for something else? cross-thread arguments which are against JR’s rules...and you do know that. Stick with the here and now.
Also, masked obscenities are also against the rules so not everyone is blameless.
nice parsing of words.
you used “ought” correctly in your prior post then define its use incorrectly here.
ought is seldom used without “to” or “not”(or not to).
The actual definition of “ought”? who knows...if anything it’s subjective.
How should one read your use of it and the following admonishment:
“You have removed yourselves from the community, and
trashed the community so you need to stay OUT of the community.”
Pretty weak and mean.
Seems FR used to be more civil...or not.
And ironically founded by Chinese dissidents.
Yeah, Falun Gong practioners. The ones who managed to escape and not have their organs removed.
With an oak leaf cluster when you reach four shots.
Surely you meant we were removed from the community. Cast out. That's what you meant to say, right? Cause you never lie. Right? Cause lying is bad. Right?
Now stop squabbling. This ain't the roller derby.
Is that what I meant?
Cast out.
Yet here you are.
And Little lying Jermy, too, crying to teacher with lies.
Oh, I'm sure there is some self-justified Qtard victim defense to this.
Suck it up, y'all have earned every inch of this.
HG, with all due respect. Do you really think you're in a position to call somebody else a nut?
#PhysicianHealThyself
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.