Skip to comments.
Work of former medical examiner to be reviewed after he testified for defense in Chauvin trial
Chicago Tribune ^
| April 23, 2021
| Phillip Jackson and Justin Fenton
Posted on 04/23/2021 10:48:12 PM PDT by Coronal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Reverend Wright
We need our own homeland. We already have one. The anti-American Marxists need to go somewhere else. Another country or a different plane of existence, makes no difference to me.
21
posted on
04/24/2021 3:57:33 AM PDT
by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Coronal
Sounds like NaziCommie retribution to me.
The accused have NO right to a defense...
22
posted on
04/24/2021 7:46:22 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Coronal
The announcement came less than 24 hours after the attorney general’s office received a letter from the former medical examiner of Washington, D.C., Roger A. Mitchell, signed by 431 doctors from around the country, saying Fowler’s testimony and conclusions were so far outside the bounds of accepted forensic practice that all his previous work could come into question.
Keep this in mind whenever a pro-Vaccine Freeper tells you that we can trust the doctors telling us that the Vaccines are safe.
23
posted on
04/24/2021 10:20:13 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Coronal
No wonder the left loves China so much, this is straight from their playbook
24
posted on
04/24/2021 11:27:36 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
It was a Yale ‘psychiatrist’.
I can assure you that pretty much every medical venue (Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Cornell, UCLA, etc.) that is propped up as a ‘super’ expert program is absolutely not. Guaranteed.
There’s not enough time in the day to be 1) a good physician (who looks at all the data and supplements all of their assessments with physiological, chemical, physical, molecular, and immunological science and correlates this with the specifics of individual patients) AND 2) a self-promoting politically adept academic MD who keeps their back protected and sucks up to the right people. It’s nearly impossible.
So, most docs who chase titles and fame are not the people you want to take care of you. That is a very, very important self-preserving rule of thumb you should consider each and every time you choose a physician.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson