Posted on 08/12/2021 8:28:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
“It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.”
What a great idea... These are real humanitarians! 104 dead babies out of 127 pregnancies. That is just not enough to establish a trend. Why not find a thousand more pregnant lady volunteers and sacrifice at the current rate just 819 more babies? Why didn’t Bill Gates think of it? It is all for science.
Just sickening.
Just evil for ANYONE to advocate that pregnant women take these dangerous shots.
What kind of person even volunteers for this ‘review’???
Dems, RINOS and CINOS here will attack you just as they attack on the other threads that show this is all a scamdemic, a plandemic, or when Fauci is being exposed yet again.
45,000 deaths by vaccine. No biggie
I hate to think this but maybe this”Vaccine” was designed from the start as a population reducer.
Its certainly doing the job better than the ChiCom Bioweapon its supposed to treat.
If I read the actual paper correctly, the study is a snapshot of time, December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Within that (arbitrary?) time-window, from a total vaccinated sample of 3958 women, 827 women had their pregnancies end in one manner or another.
The 827 completed pregnancies includes 115 miscarriages/stillbirth. All of these are from the larger group of 3958.
It so happens that the ratio of successful/unsuccessful pregnancies reported in their chosen time-window is generally “normal”. However, that they managed to capture 700 women who didn’t even get the shot until the third term makes me wonder if they did some custom fitting of their study time-window, to possibly hide something disturbing.
I’d rather know the eventual outcome for all 3958 women before drawing any conclusions.
But you're the one who said that, not me.
This report was posted on FR quite a while ago. I don’t care for their presentation, but I also think the critique is a bit lacking.
From the study: “. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester).
Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported.
Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases)”
Found in the conclusions section:
“However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.”
Data was collected from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, which means that some women’s full term delivery may not happen until October or November. The study was EPublished in April-when the fate of the majority of the 3958 pregnancies was unknown.
They do note that most of the live births were for the people given shots in the third trimester. And they note that further study of those vaccinated early in pregnancy are needed.
So of the 3958 followed in V-safe, we only know the outcome of 827, which leaves 3131 as unknown. How many of those were 1st or 2cd trimester? What has since transpired?
The study also notes that this result is comparable to other studies done which involved pregnant women - but we have also do not know from what is presented here, what those studies involved.
Bottom line is that it is clear that if you are going to risk this shot, best do it in third trimester, but we didn’t really need a study to tell us that-did we?
And we won’t know the final statistics of the impact of the shot in early pregnancy vs late stages, unless someone completes the follow up on the rest of the 3958.
Additionally it was noted that 35,691 were reported as pregnant when looking at more than V-safe. We have no reporting on those at all.
This is just plain wrong. The people who wrote this article didn’t read the source.. just went crazy and got things backward. 20% abortion rate isn’t acceptable to anyone so.. the actual report is a nightmare... but being just wrong blows credibility.
___________S P I K E _ P R O T E I N S______ You are being injected with these when you become WackCinatted
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.
Thanks for posting. Forced vax coming where I am working my notice. I get out just in time.
Ya know, some people are saying to make them fire ya. Then you can be part of the class action lawsuits that are bound to be coming down the line.
I’m just glad I’ve been retired for a while, and have no need to deal with the ignorance that is prevailing.
I just watched Dr. McCullough, and he said the vaccines are already obsolete, and since it is very treatable at home, if treatment is started early, there is no reason to do this.
And from other studies and outbreaks, we know that the Injected can be sick without knowing it due to reduced symptoms and thus, spread it unknowingly.
So any company that requires this is basically shooting themselves in the foot. People who know they are sick can stay home and not infect the workplace.
I like that short video from Dr. Stock - pretty much explains it all in about 6 minutes:
It went viral, and has already been taken down from the original source, but it’s still on Gorka’s tweet-linked above. I hope someone can put it on rumble or bit chute cause it is really good. Why the shot makes things worse.
Full text; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/
Read it for yourselves and make your own decision. BTW, this is based on v-safe reporting. That’s the CDC’s internal version of VAERS.
OK.. I will look again.
Thanks.. they did a great job of hiding this astonishing nightmare in a footnote. Rereading the post and the actual article rather than the abstract.. this is much clearer.
“but nobody I know who has been vaccinated has had any adverse reactions.”
Everyone I know that got the vaccine has had complications. They were usually sick as a dog for 10 days. I know several who have died. A bud of mine right now is getting over a 14 day illness after his first shot. Several co-workers have died.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.