Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Sanctions Sidney Powell, Lin Wood over 2020 Election Challenge
National Review ^ | August 25, 2021 | BRITTANY BERNSTEIN

Posted on 08/25/2021 5:43:10 PM PDT by Armscor38

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Armscor38

Good. They deserve everything they get for bringing such horrible lawsuits.


61 posted on 08/26/2021 6:58:58 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Just like Kraken’s case for the General, this case won’t be overturned by a Court of Appeals. Kraken lost that case because the law was not on her side. Her PR was effective but her legal arguments were weak. This is why releasing the Kraken was an impossibility - no matter how much you want to change this.

If her voter fraud lawsuit, 9 months later, were to be filed today she would lose again. Provable facts actually matter. Kraken doesn’t.


62 posted on 08/26/2021 7:45:32 AM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Oystir
Just like Kraken’s case for the General, this case won’t be overturned by a Court of Appeals. Kraken lost that case because the law was not on her side.

Are you talking about Michael Flynn's case?

63 posted on 08/26/2021 8:01:28 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Armscor38

Obammy appointed Judge 2014.. Suhprize suhprize.


64 posted on 08/26/2021 9:57:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!! In CONgre$$ WE're Disgusted!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Yes, I was.


65 posted on 08/26/2021 10:20:57 AM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Armscor38

A corrupt Obama judge.


66 posted on 08/26/2021 12:36:59 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oystir
Just like Kraken’s case for the General [Michael Flynn], this case won’t be overturned by a Court of Appeals.

Dirty Emmet Sullivan's vendetta against Flynn got slapped down by a three-judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, so he went for an en banc hearing before the full DC Circuit Court of Appeals, because he knew that the full court was loaded with Obamaclowns and Rapin Bill puppets.

==============

Today [August 5, 2020], that Court released the list of 10 of its judges who will participate 
in the en banc hearing in the case of General Mike Flynn:

Here is a listing of those judges along with the President who appointed them:

Srinivasian – Obama

Rogers – Clinton

Henderson – Bush 41

Tatel – Clinton

Garland – Clinton

Griffith – Bush 43

Millett – Obama

Pillard – Obama

Wilkins – Obama

Rao – Trump

Judge Katsas, a Trump appointee, has recused himself from this hearing, presumably for some conflict.

For those keeping score at home, that amounts to 7 judges appointed by either Obama or Clinton 
compared to just 3 appointed by Republican presidents.

We all know how those 7 Obama/Clinton judges are going to rule, don’t we? Of course we do.

Thus, the fix is in. Sidney Powell might as well not bother to even show up for arguments when this 
kangaroo court hearing convenes on August 11. She should focus on preparing an appeal to the U.S. 
Supreme Court. In the meantime, the Deep State advances towards its goal of delaying the final 
disposition of this case – in which the DOJ moved to dismiss more two months ago – until after 
the November election has come and gone.

==============

You're not much an observer of the federal courts and the law if you're not aware that the Flynn outcome was rigged. Flynn and Powell won the initial DC Court of Appeals case over Dirty Emmet Sullivan, so it had to be "massaged" by partisan Democrat clown-judges - just like this partisan clown-judge Linda V. Parker.

67 posted on 08/26/2021 12:54:27 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: krizzy

“ Mike Lindell has spent millions providing facts.”

Well, he might as well have burned that money for heat. I watched one of his videos showing “proof.” It was pathetic. Horrible conclusions based on specious “data.”


68 posted on 08/26/2021 6:33:53 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch
On what basis did this judge have jurisdiction?

She was the judge before whom the case was originally filed.

If she never held a hearing on the merits of the cases, there can be no recommendation for adverse actions against the lawyers. Was she even assigned at case? If so, where is the decision on the merits?

She was assigned the case, and wrote the decision dismissing it-- a decision which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, and which the Supreme Court declined to review.

This will not stand on appeal.

Read the decision. It is very likely to be affirmed.

69 posted on 08/27/2021 6:24:05 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson