Frustrated LA voters given provisional ballots after equipment glitch in recall election

Washington Examiner ^ | 13 September 2021 | Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor

[Lazamataz]

And Semierect is all of that, and then some. He's on the wrong side of EVERY issue. He totally gives himself away on this thread.

Looked at his posting history. Starting to wonder....

...remember when some accounts were compromised and the vandal started posting nonsensical, porn-like posts?

What if someone on the left compromised an old-school account and started posting like a lefty?

[Lazamataz]

Where’s the report that only Republicans were affected?

If you insist I invest the time to find the report, I shall.

However, your framing of the question is a strawman: No one is saying ONLY Republicans were affected.

We are saying that the majority of those affected were Republicans.

That is what the report I read, said.

[Lazamataz]

You can’t delete them once they have been counted. There is no way to tell which votes were the fraudulent ones. And once mail in ballots are separated from their envelopes then they can never be connected to the voter ever again.

Beginning to believe this is a major flaw in our voting system. The positive of this is that no politician can look up who didn't vote for them, then (in a tyranny) punish the voter.

The negative of this is what we see: Any fraudulent vote cannot be rolled back.

[JonPreston]

McCarthy & Mitch got this.

[semimojo]

No one is saying ONLY Republicans were affected.

The post I was replying to:

Notice how these mysterious “glitches” ALWAYS favor the rat...

I don’t know if both parties were affected or not but automatically assuming grand conspiracies without evidence makes us look like idiots.

[Revel]

So imagine that every vote or ballot gets assigned a non repeating random number. If you could design a system where you were sure that only the voter gets to know that number then the voter could look up that number on line to see how their vote was counted.

[Lazamataz]

So imagine that every vote or ballot gets assigned a non repeating random number. If you could design a system where you were sure that only the voter gets to know that number then the voter could look up that number on line to see how their vote was counted.

Blockchain would also achieve this.

[.44 Special]

Show me the one time voting “glitches” favoured the Republicans. Mojo my ass.

[Revel]

Yet obviously the best solution is to run elections the old fashioned way which made it very difficult to mass cheat in the first place.

I particularly liked the mechanical lever machines. The counters themselves were sealed units. The counters were in sealed locked cabinets. And even if you could gain access it would take a long time to click the counters up just a few votes. And impossible to do without being seen. And the individual race counters better jive with the total voters counter. And no one could cry about hanging chads. It was a brilliant design.

[bagster]

I don’t know if both parties were affected or not but automatically assuming grand conspiracies without evidence makes us look like idiots.

Wrongo, semilegitimate.

Tell me this, answer man. If the national Presidential election was rigged and stolen by a GRAND CONSPIRACY, as it surely was, what makes you think the California recall election wouldn't be. This piece of evidence, this 'glitch', is evidence that they are trying to pull the same game.

You do realize the entire state is run by the democrat derp machine, including the elections. And there is no governmental agency to even give the appearance of stopping them.

Anybody that doesn't acknowledge THAT is the idiot. Which would be you.

No offense.

p.s. IF they pull this off, then watch for an enraged and vengeful Newsome to turn up the volume on the covid/vaax power grab hoax. He will have his vengeance in this life or the next. He'll teach us uppity peons to try to recall him. He's been going half speed for fear of recall up to this point.

But you'll be happy about that, I'm quite sure.

[Revel]

Maybe. Not my area of expertise.

[bagster]

What if someone on the left compromised an old-school account and started posting like a lefty?

I'm very sure there are compromised old accounts running the derp game, as well as embeds with original accounts.

This cat, I am told, has been a lefty 'troll' for a very long time. I believe it.

Who in the world would take a neutral stand on obvious vote fraud and who it benefits. After decades of evidence and in light of this past fake election?

Even an honest democrat (if you could find one) understands this.

[Lazamataz]

Maybe. Not my area of expertise.

Not quite mine, but rather close.

However, blockchain is rather complicated to explain to a largely-stupid populace.

The non-repeating random number idea is much easier to explain. Thinking now about how it might be compromised by an enemy.... not seeing much yet....

[semimojo]

Show me the one time voting “glitches” favoured the Republicans.

I can’t and never said there were any.

[semimojo]

This piece of evidence, this 'glitch', is evidence that they are trying to pull the same game.

You do realize the entire state is run by the democrat derp machine, including the elections.

Let’s see. The entire state election apparatus is corrupt and the “machine” can do anything they want.

The best plan they can come up with is to tell Republican voters that they’ve already voted, hoping they’ll go away and not complain to anyone.

It would be too simple to just let them vote and then delete or alter that vote, as some claim they did all over the country in 2020. Instead they come up with a scheme guaranteed to be spotted.

The problem with these conspiracy theories is the proponents are too lazy to think them through.

[bagster]

The best plan they can come up with is to tell Republican voters that they’ve already voted, hoping they’ll go away and not complain to anyone.

Best if you use 'we'.

That's just one of the symptoms of your plan. They integrate or 'count' votes in the names of actual voters, via the mail in scheme. If the actual voters show up in person to vote, the record shows they've already voted. This happened hella times in the last national election.

We call this 'the covid effect'.

If the voter objects in person, they are given a 'provisional' ballot. The fraudulent vote stays in the count, and the 'provisional' gets counted, maybe maybe not. It depends on if the democrats counting the votes actually do the work to verify the provisional vote.

And this is just one of the ways you people steal our votes.

The more you talk, the more like a child you sound. Nobody's that naive.

[semimojo]

They integrate or 'count' votes in the names of actual voters, via the mail in scheme. If the actual voters show up in person to vote, the record shows they've already voted.

Just to be sure I understand the scheme; they don’t wait until they know who’s actually shown up to vote, instead they pick registered Republicans and mark them as having voted knowing that many will actually try to vote in person.

And we’re worried about people who come up with such an idiotic scheme?

[BiglyCommentary]

“What makes you think this glitch favored one party?”

Newsome called me on my cell and told me directly. There you go, an answer befitting the question...

[BiglyCommentary]

such an idiotic scheme?

I'm thinking a box of rocks has more smarts on this topic than you have shown. The GOP voter gets a vote cast for them for the RAT candidate/position. AFTER the early fraud vote the GOP voter shows up in person or their ballot shows up in the mail that vote goes in as provisional ballot. Those are only processed if the vote margin is within the recount margin so 99% of the time those provisional ballots are never looked at. It's actually a very effective and slick way for the rats to cheat.

[semimojo]

The GOP voter gets a vote cast for them for the RAT candidate/position. AFTER the early fraud vote the GOP voter shows up in person or their ballot shows up in the mail that vote goes in as provisional ballot.

Why do early fraud when you know you'll get caught - like in this case?

Wait and generate votes from registered GOP people who you know didn't vote.

Besides, it would be obvious if you had lots more provisional GOP ballots than Dem.