Posted on 10/05/2021 3:54:23 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
That seems more like a programming accomplishment than a discovery in physics.
My size 11 would like to “breakthrough” their drawers.
Could these “prizes” be any more political? (And global authoritarian political at that.)
How the…… … did al gore miss out on these alocades.
Oh noooo! We all realize the nobel peace prize has been a travesty for many years now. But now the prize in physics? It used to have some meaning. Einstein received this prize. Now it’s a woke joke. Very sad. The unraveling of civilization continues.
“that could predict”
But do they?
Most of the models can’t predict the past.
If we punch in data from 1900, does the model accurately show climate results for 1950? If not why not?
Much of the Earth enjoys temperature stabilizing systems.
We increasingly live near the coasts for good reason.
Here I thought only the Nobel Peace Prize was strictly political, having been doled out to those who advanced the liberal causes of the day.
I was wrong. The infection has spread.
So now the Nobel Prize in Physics is as worthless as is the Nobel Peace Prize.
Yes, that’s another aspect. Throwing my sons’ D&D dice “could predict” future weather, too.
Agenda driven....
“UC’s new ClimateEx map uses predictive models to display where the world could see the most and least climate change over the next 50 years. Green areas could see least change while white and brown areas are predicted to see the most.”
https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/625228
“The map, called ClimateEx, also allows researchers to study what areas of the globe have seen the most dramatic changes in climate over time. Not surprisingly, this includes portions of the warming arctic. But perhaps surprisingly the map also demonstrates that the tropics around the equator also have seen big changes. Stepinski said this is due not to variations in temperature but in monthly rainfall.”
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/636945
I can put most computers into an endless loop. I think I should get a Nobel Prize.
As long as they can explain the grass and tree stumps below the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica.
lengthy, but you can navigate to different topics, according to timeline in the show notes. btw President Trump gets a couple of positive mentions in the last five minutes or so:
19 Sept: Youtube: 1hr36m: Greenpeace’s Ex-President Patrick Moore | Is Climate Change Fake? - Modern Wisdom Podcast 373
Interviewed by Chris Williamson
Expect to learn Patrick’s thoughts on humanity’s impact on global warming temperatures, his opinion on Extinction Rebellion and Greta Thunberg, what people mean when they say we’ve only got 50 harvests left, whether we should be worried about rising sea levels and much more...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5K5i5Wv7jQ
His work answered the question of why climate models can be reliable despite weather being changeable and chaotic
—
Really? Reliable? Say what? News Flash?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.