Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Ana Navarro, the Principle of Separation of Church and State Does Not Justify Abortion
Townhall.com ^ | October 5, 2021 | Katherine Blakeman

Posted on 10/05/2021 7:32:12 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Little Ray

Strictly speaking, the idea of separation of church and state was formulated during the Reformation to protect the church from the state because of the corruption that occured when the state usurped the moral authority of the church.

If anything, we need to re-articulate the original purpose of separation of church and state because the leftist government in power now has created the “state church” of anti-white racism and it is nothing more than a latter day usurpation of the moral authority of the church by the state.


21 posted on 10/05/2021 11:21:51 AM PDT by Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi ( Gen. 12:3: a warning to all anti-semites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Leftists always seem to misunderstand, and consequently abuse the Constitution via the “Wall of Separation” theme, that appears nowhere in the Constitution, or any official government documentation. It appears first in a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a preacher, and was not meant to imply the secularization of the US government.

This is old and established ground, we all know. But, the Left continues to distort and lie, assuming they can count on the ignorance of the Constitution, by legislators and the public. There is no excuse for this, and anyone who falls for this false argument should be ashamed of their lack of basic knowledge of our rights and responsibilities regarding the Constitution.

Yet I forever hear about “the Constitutional Right to Abortion” and how it is “settled law”. It simply is not. I once enraged a weak minded leftist, by challenging him to explain the “law making process” and remember if he could the “HR” number for “House Resolution” that led to the Roe vs Wade decision, and this “law of the land”. He could not, because there never was one. It is not a law, it is a vague and poorly argued distortion of assumed content of “the Right of Privacy”, which somehow is made into a ruling to supersede a person’s right not to be killed, for an other’s convenience.

Make the ignorant face this fact that there is no such right, spelled out anywhere in the Constitution. Never was there, and can only be added with legitimate amendments to that most important document. The Left knows that this will never happen, so they lie, and lie, and lie.


22 posted on 10/05/2021 5:59:18 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (As if.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson