Posted on 01/11/2022 9:37:50 AM PST by ShadowAce
My ranch is on a hill. I will work very hard to make them die on this hill first. I will not be going to a concentration camp. This is not a keyboard warrior statement - it is just the truth. Taking people to camps could very well be the start of a civil war.
They have everything they need already. An excuse, a ready and willing media, and now an emergency.
They will label you a terrorist, surround you, shoot your dogs, and take your children. If they can’t seize the children, they will have the FBI kill them by burning the whole building down with them in it.
This is what democrats do.
BTW, I am in the country and located on a hill as well......
It would only start a “Civil War” if there was some coordinated response. Otherwise it’s just individual households being raided.
Oh they’ll go home.... in a body bag.
Much will be said about “if they come for me I’ll shoot”. Yes, there’s that.
Then there’s: at some point, involving a disease mitigated by either recovering from it or getting vaccinated for it, they’re obligated to let people out. Some of those people will perceive cause to, er, ensure nobody else is likewise subjugated. Once the Powers That Be realize this, the process of release becomes, er, problematic. Consequentially, releases (at least for some) will be delayed - in some cases due to lack of functioning metabolism.
Rephrased: if they “go there”, they can’t stop. Unintended consequences.
Of course they could comb through vaccination records which would be cumbersome and expensive. Will the tax payers fund such an endeavor?
I would think that folks would be brought to the attention of the Stasi squads because of friends and family members who are Karens and know they are not vaccinated. Keep your mouth shut about your vaccination status so they don’t turn on you.
closed super stores are being converted cheap for that use and car dealerships
I know that they do.
I am sure that every poster on this forum (and many other forums) have been identified. But it's a very long list and "they" are short-staffed. It will be quite a while before they can get around to me - or you.
The only awkward part is that about 25% of those identifications are wrong in essential particulars (like real name and current address). There will be a large number of "Oops" incidents when the strike teams go active.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn had some pertinent comments about that.
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat.”
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956
Bow down!... Obey!... Snitch!...
Get used to it or do something significant about it...
If you get on that bus to the Happy Fun Wellness Camp, you can expect with reasonable confidence that you will never be coming back.
What to do? What to do?
Section 3a of the text says the “emergency detainment” may not last for more than 10 days. That sounds a lot more like an at-home quarantine than a concentration camp. I’m pretty sure the Jews spent more than 10 days each at Auschwitz. Also, if this law was passed in October 2019 where are the masses of missing Freepers? Where are the camps themselves located?
The left is already trying to portray us as paranoid extremists. Let’s not make their job easier for them.
Here is the agenda for the meeting on 1/12/22:
https://sboh.wa.gov/Portals/7/Doc/Meetings/2022/Jan%2012/WSBOH-Agenda-2022-01-12-Final.pdf?ver=2022-01-05-175008-690
I also spoke with the InformedChoiceWA.org https://informedchoicewa.org/news/your-comments-attendance-needed-at-boh-meeting/ which is an excellent advocacy group and they confirmed this is not true (Involuntarily detain, etc.) but the WA BOH is still discussing mandating K-12 students be vaccinated. ICW is fighting that.
I did point out to the WA BOH Executive Director that the WAC (state law) and RCW (state code) that does state people can be involuntary detained/confined at a state facility needs to change. It's been on the books for close to twenty years so it's not new. The BOH can work to change RCW's but not WAC's. WAC are law so have to be changed by the legislature.
I'm no fan of the state of WA government, including the BOH and I am NOT defending them. I'm a fan of the truth plain and simple and various websites/bloggers/youtubers are spreading falsehoods.
One good thing about earlier articles claiming this is it caused a firestorm of opposition (good!) and the BOH was inundated with phone calls, faxes, and emails from citizens.
We did this one already. 246-100 has been the law since 1991 and was last revised in 2003.
Every state has a version of this. It has nothing to do with COVID. It’s a quarantine statute.
Your own State of Missouri has a stricter version of this in place.
(1) The local health authority, the director of the Department of Health or the director’s designated representative shall require isola- tion of a patient or animal with a communi- cable disease, quarantine of contacts, concur- rent and terminal disinfection, or modified forms of these procedures necessary for the protection of the public health. The isolation of a patient, animal or contact shall be car- ried out according to the methods of control in 19 CSR 20-20.040(1).
(2) No person or animal infected with or sus- pected of having a communicable disease list- ed in 19 CSR 20-20.020(1)–(3) or any con- tact of a disease subject to quarantine or isolation shall move or be moved from one (1) health jurisdiction to another, unless nec- essary for medical care, without notice to and consent from the local health authority, the director of the Department of Health or the director’s designated representative. If a per- son is moved for the reason of medical care, the health authority who ordered the isolation or quarantine shall be notified within seven- ty-two (72) hours.
(3) The local health authority, the director of the Department of Health or the director’s designated representative is empowered to close any public or private school or other place of public or private assembly when, in the opinion of the local health authority, the director of the Department of Health or the director’s designated representative, the clos- ing is necessary to protect the public health. Any school or other place of public or private assembly that is ordered closed shall not reopen until permitted by whomever ordered the closure.
192.320. Violation of law or quarantine — penalty. — Any person or persons violating any of the provisions of sections 192.010, 192.020 to 192.490, 192.600 to 192.620 or who shall leave any pesthouse, or isolation hospital, or quarantined house or place without the consent of the health officer having jurisdiction, or who evades or breaks quarantine or knowingly conceals a case of contagious, infectious, or communicable disease, or who removes, destroys, obstructs from view, or tears down any quarantine card, cloth or notice posted by the attending physician or by the health officer, or by direction of a proper health officer, shall be deemed guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
Who knew you could delete an FR post? How?
WHO CARES what “laws” are on the books? They try this in MY state, and most of them will be going home in a casket. END OF STORY.
And WA residents will show exactly how free citizens organize to fight a terrorist government.
President Ronald Reagan (RIP):
“Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people.”
These laws aren’t for COVID vaccines. They are in place to quarantine people who have really dangerous diseases like Ebola and won’t voluntarily quarantine.
Let’s play that hypothetical.
Let’s say woke Karen goes to Africa and contracts a mutated form of Ebola that is as contagious as the measles and as deadly as Ebola (90% case fatality rate).
Woke Karen refuses to quarantine.
What should the State do and under what authority should they act?
And here is what Alabama law says:
https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/2018/title-22/title-1/chapter-12/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.