Every time the U.S. government attempts to clarify the biolabs in Ukraine, they end up making things less clear.
Why is Soros funding biolbas in Ukraine?
Posted on 04/04/2022 9:27:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Why is Soros funding biolbas in Ukraine?
Every time the U.S. government attempts to clarify the biolabs in Ukraine, they end up making things less clear.
In the most recent example, Deborah Rosenbaum, the assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs, told the House subcommittee on Intelligence and Special Operations on Friday that “I can say to you unequivocally there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”
In a fact sheet produced March 11, 2022, the U.S. Defense Department admitted to working with biological weapons facilities in Ukraine [LINK].
“The United States … has invested approximately $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.”
As the current story is told the U.S. government was coordinating with the Ukraine government on biologic research facilities, many of which were left over from the former Soviet era. In/around the time the Russian invasion was feared, they worked quickly to destroy the pathogens, because they were worried what might happen if the Russians took control of the facilities.
This begs the obvious first question, if the U.S. Defense Department was working with Ukraine since 2005, and they could destroy the deadly pathogens in a few days before the conflict, why didn’t the Pentagon destroy them in the preceding 16 years?
The second question targets the issues that are more opaque. The DoD says the U.S. has not been involved in “offensive biological weapon” creation in Ukraine. Technically, all of the weapons in the U.S. military are classified as “defensive” weapons, ergo the Department of Defense. Every weapon is defensive until it is used; then, depending on the circumstances, the use of the weapon changes its classification to offensive. Why would biological weapons be any different?
By the current standard of Defense Department definitions, all of the biological weapons they might be working with Ukraine to develop would technically be classified defensive weapons. As a result, saying “there are no offensive biologic weapons” is a rather moot and irrelevant point.
♦ Point One – Russia and the U.S. Pentagon both agree the U.S. government was working in Ukraine in biological weapons labs.
♦ Point Two – Both Russia and the U.S. admit these were/are deadly biological pathogens.
♦ Point Three – The biggest difference between the two positions is that Russia says these were offensive weapons, and the U.S/Ukraine saying these were defensive weapons.
The debate is not about whether the U.S. Defense Department was operating and funding biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine. The U.S. government has now made that admission. The debate is now about the purpose or intent of those weapons.
If Russia was investing in biological weapons labs in Mexico, and if the Russian military was working inside those labs along with Mexican government officials, I suspect the United States would conduct a special military operation in Mexico to remove that threat.
I believed everything "our" government told me.
For example, I believed diving under my school desk would protect me from an atomic bomb.
Then I turned 7 and reached the age of reason...
I agree with you both - NOT ONE SINGLE WORD. What little credibility they had before COVID is now long gone. LIARS, all of them.
They could tell me water is wet and I’d still make them prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Yeah. That would happen.
Wink wink…now move along
“Deborah Rosenbaum, the assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs, told the House Subcommittee on Intelligence and Special Operations on Friday that there are “unequivocally … no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”
Well that settles it then.
DoD would not lie to congress.
And that is the Gospel truth. There is a whole lot of research you can do before it is actually a bioweapon.
China is probably the master at those type of research facilities. And we can always ask Fauci because he has a lot of experience getting questionable research done in other countries.
really, the labs they said don’t exist, those labs...
and this info came from where, hunter???
Only if you are ignorant of the development of bio-weapons. Ukraine at one time "did" have labs, and researchers, working on offensive bioweapons. With the collapse of the USSR, those labs and researchers no longer had a purpose...or those personnel places to work. The USA stepped in and re-focused those lab facilities (and more importantly) those researchers toward defensive research. At the time, the alternative was for those personnel to disperse to places like (for instance) Iran, and continue to work on offensive projects.
“They are such liars!”
You mean the US Nazi bio weapon labs in Ukraine actually produced offensive biological weapons ? Are they still operational ?
I suppose they need more funding to do more research; without oversight of course.
I think the problem is that there are more than a few FReepers that suffer from confirmation bias - and seek out sources and references that confirm what said FReeper believes in. Other sources are not seriously considered because of a lack of discernment, intellectual laziness, etc.
This was in full swing re: COVID-19 vaccinations.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
lotta dancing going on in robertson's disclaimer lie
“No such thing as Antifa.”
It’s kind of ironic that “Antifa” sides with real-life, armed Nazis. Of course, the real-life, armed Nazis hate Russians every bit as much as they hate Jews so I guess that makes them okay with Antifa. Antifa hates Jews because they tend to identify with Israel and it hates Russians because they tend to oppose woke ideology.
If you’re working on defensive materials for offensive biological weapons, don’t you need at least samples of the offensive biologicals to study. If you have “defensive” samples of offensive biologicals, it’s just a short step to develop more “defensive offensive samples” ...
Hunter and his laptop are plenty “offensive” to me, did the big guy get his 10% when hunter set up these labs?
Didn’t the brass asses over there crow about how they disobeyed Trump’s orders?
Who the hell believes anything from the deep state/military!
they lie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.