Posted on 04/20/2022 10:57:59 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Explain how that was a winning strategy?
Given the separation of powers between the states and the FedGov, it was the only possible strategy available to him.
What do you think he should have done. instead (or in addition)?
The game has changed, if you watched the Gateway Pundit video from earlier today.
Watch the Gateway Pundit video from earlier today to get an inkling of what's going to happen this "election".
My prediction is that Reichsfuhrer Garland and his Department of Evil Jesters is going to be out threatening peasants over their "concern" about how "ballots" are being cast.
I have a HS friend who will not apply to any college that doesn’t have a white male featured in their brochures. He writes them to tell them he wouldn’t feel safe and welcome on their campus. No one has answered yet. I wish more would do it so it makes it harder for the colleges to ignore their own racism. Makes the narrowing down process easier.
So it wasn’t “da domininz” it was drop boxes?
Drop boxes can be watched and recorded by volunteers who aren’t lazy and who are willing to work to win rather than just cry about things after the fact.
If you had watched the video, you would have seen that was exactly what was going on.
Garland and his thugs will take note of that fact, and attempt to put a stop to it this fall.
As far as "da domininz" goes, neither you nor I can dismiss that out of hand.
These large numeric anomalies appear to happen where the fraudsters have greater control of things.
You DID actually give me a thought with that offhand comment, so thanks for that.
And I think that every state has a different strategy - it's not generic.
For example, Michigan took care of its little Trump problem in 2018, with what appears to be the assistance of Assistant Democrats, if you get my drift.
Fat lot of good it did Ricky Snyder, since the Marxists ended up prosecuting him once they were in the clear for 2020. Just like Uncle Joe Stalin put his fellow Commies up against the wall in the late '30s...
My (white) son toured UC Riverside and turned it down after picking up a distinct anti white vibe. It’s one of the most diverse campuses in the US (a little bit of everybody). Which should be a “good” thing but actually feels—not—in reality.
My (white) son toured UC Riverside and turned it down after picking up a distinct anti white vibe. It’s one of the most diverse campuses in the US (a little bit of everybody). Which should be a “good” thing but actually feels—not—in reality.
This boy’s mother was told point blank at a college fair by a Salve Regina College rep that they give less scholarship money to white males. The rep was not proud of the info.
No, it was not a winning strategy, it would never work.
Trump needed a legal team, a real team, like GWB did in 2000
The RNC should have been fighting election law changes in the states
The RNC should have had a legal team as well to challenge all changes in state laws after the election
Trump should have been encouraging voting in all means possible including mail in ballots
Trump should have stayed away from conspiracy theorists and discourage their crazy talk that the media picked up on and painted everything going on as a Qook conspiracy to over throw the election.
Trump needed to accept the idea that he could have lost the election, nobody likes a sore loser
Talking about “rigged” elections doesn’t help our side, our side will stay home since it makes no sense to vote in a “rigged” election, hence more possible democrat victories.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.