Klobuchar: Alito Is ‘Taking Us Back to the 1850s’ — ‘This Is Really Extreme’

Breitbart ^ | 05/08/2022 | Pam Key

[sauropod]

Klobuchar lies.

[mikey_hates_everything]

1850’s? Roe v Wade happened when I was 11 so I’m about 180 years old? What a Drama C***.

[windsorknot]

They’re going to put y’all back in chains.
-Joe Biden

[Ann Archy]

Dear Amy, who eats her salad with her comb...UGH, it would be better if we HAD some 50’s morals back.....especially putting GOD and Jesus back into our schools and country!~

[CarolinaReaganFan]

Klobuchar is an idiot.
I hope Alito’s final majority opinion will specifically mention the 10th amendment so it can be referenced as precedent in the future ..............

[Honest Nigerian]

What!?
Dred Scott ruling was reinstated?

[JerseyDvl]

I think it is safe to say that hyperbole and massive exaggeration will rule this debate.... For the murderous lefties.
That is why they have to say this will affect other things besides abortion because they’re not getting much traction off of this leak, in my humble opinion.

[databoss]

That’s simply not true.

[CarolinaReaganFan]

https://babylonbee.com/news/worried-about-roe-getting-overturned-avoid-getting-pregnant-with-this-one-foolproof-trick

[devere]

She’s a nut case who eats her salad with a comb.

[kiryandil]

Klobuchar was "elected" in the rigged Minnesota "fakelections".

The dirty cheater should STFU.

[Spok]

Actually, it’s 1789, and the U.S. Constitution.

[RedMonqey]

She truly is. The 14th amendment was adopted after the civil war, not in the 1850s.

[Vendome]

Samuel Alito is “taking us back to the 1850s”

Really?

So they will overturn 13th, 14th and 14th ammendment, reaffirm Dred v Scott and repeal the 19th ammendment

Sounds like winning..../S

[alloysteel]

Liberté, égalité, fraternité, that motto harks back to the days of the French Revolution. When in reality, liberté meant not “liberty”, but “libertine”, égalité meant not “equality”, but “some are more equal than others”, and fraternité meant not “brotherhood”, but more like “fratricide”.

Command-and-control people are much the same all over the world, redefining words to fit their version of “reality”.

[CommerceComet]

Based on all the liberal hysterics, how in the world did this nation ever survive the almost 200 years prior to the issuance of Roe v. Wade?

[AlaskaErik]

In the 1850s Democrats were the slave owners and they were the ones who defended the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision.

[Political Junkie Too]

Klobuchar simply thinks that being forced to deal with abortion my hurt her presidential electoral chances.

The worst thing about Roe v. Wade is that it allowed our politicians to hide behind the ruling for far too long. The issue needs to be debated, but the debate never happened as long as Roe was out there.

The blow to the left is about the ability to create rights in the Constitution. The "third party interest" is the key to the whole thing.

The Declaration of Independence says that our rights are inherent in each of us, and endowed upon us by our Creator. The Constitution guarantees to each of us these inherent rights.

I don't need the involvement of a third party to enjoy free speech, to publish, to congregate somewhere, to worship, or to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I don't need the involvement of others to defend myself from harm.

I don't need the involvement of others to demand the privacy of my papers and possessions.

I don't need the involvement of others to have the right to confront my accusers.

But I do require the involvement of a third party to have an abortion performed on me. Once the third party is involved, there is a role for government regulations to play:

• Is this person qualified? Who else will assist?
• Is there a standard procedure to be followed, including post-abortion recovery?
• What tools will be used? How will they be cleaned?
• Where will it be performed?
• Is the location safe and clean?
• What will happen to the aborted fetus?

An abortion is not an inherent Constitutionally-protected right of the same kind as those listed above. If someone else must collaborate with me in order for it to happen, it is not a right.

Justice Alito is simply saying that abortion does not rise to the level of a Constitutional right, and that the proper venue for society to deal with it is via the people through their state and federal legislative processes.

That's it.

Dredd Scott was a bad ruling because it violated the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (made moot by the 13th amendment).

Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education because it violated the right to peaceably assemble.

With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, many of the invented rights (based on equal protection and nothing else) will be up for debate, meaning they must be inherent individual rights or societally agreed upon law via the legislative processes.

When Roe is reversed, three things will happen:

1. The debates will begin in the several states, as the states grapple with the issue.
2. The people will eventually clamor for a national solution after the states create a patchwork of different laws.
3. Congress will be forced to come up with single uniform solution to abortion.

As long as Roe has been "settled law," it allowed the extremes to rule the middle. On the one hand was the "abortion any time" crowd that included day of birth (and sometimes the day after), and on the other hand was the "no abortion ever" under any circumstance group. Most people are somewhere in the middle of these two extremes.

They need to be heard, and the politicians need to be forced to listen and deal with it once and for all.

-PJ

[From The Deer Stand]

Nothing like killing a child in the womb to top off a nice day, eh Amy?

[43north]

I am having trouble deciding who the dumbest female dhimmicrat senator is. Klobuchar is right up there but what about Maizie, Kirsten, Patti, and Dianne? Kammie would be a slam dunk if she hadn’t risen to the post of dumbest VP ever. Apologies if I have missed any.