Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Discoveries on Shroud of Turin Directly Contradict 1988 Carbon Dating, Put It Roughly Around Judea Some 2,000 Years Ago
https://www.westernjournal.com/ ^ | June 12, 2022 | Jack Davis

Posted on 06/12/2022 4:46:31 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
To: fortes fortuna juvat

Dont act dumb. Everyone can see it.


41 posted on 06/12/2022 5:48:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

And not by coincidence, Jesus had his hands strategically placed so that the energy of the resurrection would not leave a graphic image of his private parts on the negative of the burial shroud...He was quite modest!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thank you, Doctor, for bringing that to everyone’s attention!


42 posted on 06/12/2022 5:48:25 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Democrat politicians and voters are dangerously psychotic. They confirm it everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

It shows the travel history as well as the earliest dating possible.


43 posted on 06/12/2022 5:55:19 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I do NOT need it, but having such a proof is awesome. It hurts nothing.


44 posted on 06/12/2022 5:57:07 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jarwulf

The shroud is flattened to two dimensions. It would have been wrapped in three dimensions. Distortion would be expected.


45 posted on 06/12/2022 5:57:50 PM PDT by gundog ( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Why not? What is your problem with it?


46 posted on 06/12/2022 5:58:57 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hardshell

I agree with you 1000%.
But I truly believe that it IS Jesus.
But so what, if it isn’t..


47 posted on 06/12/2022 6:00:22 PM PDT by telescope115 (Proud member of the ANTIFAuci movement. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

And that makes it 2000 years old?

No, the Shroud cloth has been carbon dated to that time period.


48 posted on 06/12/2022 6:02:30 PM PDT by telescope115 (Proud member of the ANTIFAuci movement. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
I don’t need the Shroud, to believe in my Lord and Savior.

So why does that automatically prove the Shroud is false?

(Your argument begins to resemble the Babel Fish in the science fiction novel The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy.)

49 posted on 06/12/2022 6:02:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Try suggesting that some of your fellow posters adopt that attitude.

It is much more unifying and uplifting for all involved.


50 posted on 06/12/2022 6:03:53 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

God’s receipt for the resurrection.


51 posted on 06/12/2022 6:04:03 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I never said it was false; you have.
I find it intriguing, but not anywhere near my Faith without it.


52 posted on 06/12/2022 6:04:57 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I’m not in a mood today to suffer fools.


53 posted on 06/12/2022 6:05:52 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Not NEW. I already knew all this.

NO DOUBT, This IS the burial cloth of Jesus Christ and imprinted by His glory as He resurrected through it.


54 posted on 06/12/2022 6:05:54 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Yes. I am glad they did recognize it. Only technology revealed what they already knew.


55 posted on 06/12/2022 6:06:44 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Sorry, evidence requires provenance and chain of custody.

There is no way to prove it is the very cloth that hat wrapped the body of Christ. That said, it otherwise could be authentic, just not proveable.

I’ll love k at it with interest as a scientist and a believer, but it, fragments of the cross, the spear thrust, the cup etc.have no relevance to my faith in the Son of God, my Savior.


56 posted on 06/12/2022 6:09:35 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior

The shroud isnt important as to why I believe. Christ is. Do you not read what people write?


57 posted on 06/12/2022 6:10:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Are you you being obtuse, or are you trying to pick fights?

...or both?


58 posted on 06/12/2022 6:11:22 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

He was not the modest one. It would have been Joseph of Aremathea and others who assisted with the burial. Was probably common practice.


59 posted on 06/12/2022 6:14:29 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I have studied many things about the shroud. I have found that it is assuredly the burial clothes of Jesus Christ.

SCIENCE PROVES IT!

I am totally convinced and will not even consider any more FAKE evidence from people such as yourself. I’ve heard it all and debunked every lie.

So will I read at the website you listed? Just a minute, I have to go outside and look at the sky to see if pigs are flying.


60 posted on 06/12/2022 6:14:34 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson