Posted on 07/07/2022 8:50:27 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
Congress reintroduced the Civics Secures Democracy Act, a bill that creates a national curriculum in history and civics that federalizes teaching Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Action Civics in every K-12 classroom in America.
/\
\/
Is there a more complete confession of Marxist sedition and treason ?
It is my understanding federal money dictates what will be taught, not the local school board, IF they want the federal money. There must be a way around this.
You are a troll.
Fake news. Fake FBI accusations and arrests. Fake hearings and now fake commie lib civics. It’s a good thing the rectal orifices on Da Hill legalized drugs. Normal, thinking people wouldn’t buy any of this crap.
Those morons listed should be required to advise the students that CRT is nothing more than a jiveass theory created by a bunch of subhumans sitting around doing crack cocaine while listening to Smiley Virus and Taylor Not Too Swift noise.
This is a treasonous act. Any decent jury would return a death penalty verdict.
So,I’m guessing that the attorney wasn’t the homeschooled one.😏
There is no reason you can't do both, go to a (private or public) school and home school.
Ping
Please state the insanity and stupidity coming from the Right.
WTF are you talking about noob? The US is the most inclusive country in history. Where are you getting “deeply racist” from.?
I wasn’t series, I was trying to be funny.😏
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/879
But no text of the bill available.
Hmmmm...
“WTF are you talking about noob? The US is the most inclusive country in history. Where are you getting “deeply racist” from.?”
So called white men do not marry so called black women, in this country. If this country were colorblind, you would expect 120 in every 1000 married so called white men to be married to so called black women. Instead it’s 2 per 1000. That discrepancy - 120 per 1000 vs 2 per 1000 - is what shows you it’s a racist country. You can’t live at that level of personal racism and not have it bleed into every other part of your life.
And I’m not saying that there aren’t reasons for some discrepancy. If the difference was between 30 per 1000 and 40 per 1000, you could find other reasonable reasons. Geography, economics, culture, you name it. But between 120 per 1000 and 2 per 1000? No. That’s racism.
“Please state the insanity and stupidity coming from the Right.”
Well, just to start with, calling this Biden’s plan. Senator Cornyn is one of the sponsors. Is there some evidence that Biden, or someone working for him, wrote it? There are a lot of Democrats in Congress, and I’m sure you know they don’t all or even mostly take orders from Joe Biden. That’s why the Democratic party has been so weak. No leadership. The Progressives go their way, the Squad goes their way, Bernie and his bunch have their agenda, Joe Manchin has his, it’s a flustercluck.
Then calling it a plan to federalize Critical Race Theory. I haven’t seen any evidence that Critical Race Theory has anything to do with the misinformation that educrats on the left are trying to push down people’s throats. I’ve read some CRT and what I’ve read, you know, some of it actually makes a lot of sense and is very interesting. And some of it doesn’t. That’s the way it goes, with intellectual movements. Sometimes stuff they say makes sense, sometimes not.
Then go to the articles that have been published about this act. They take every hint as a certainty, every suggestion as absolute proof. Please. Can we just calm down? I think you and I can agree that the indoctrination the left has been pushing is wrong. I would hope we could also agree that our kids should be taught something about racism and how big a deal it is in our lives today. It’s a problem we haven’t fixed and our kids should be told that, so maybe one of them will fix it, since we can’t.
In order for your argument to be deductively correct, the race of the prospective wife would have to be the ONLY difference in consideration. A prospect's height/weight/body-type, manner of dress and behavior, and life's pursuits and general interests, would all have to be the same as a White candidate. Your argument also denies the Black women her own agency and considers the issue to be wholly a matter of the man's preference.
“In order for your argument to be deductively correct, the race of the prospective wife would have to be the ONLY difference in consideration. A prospect’s height/weight/body-type, manner of dress and behavior, and life’s pursuits and general interests, would all have to be the same as a White candidate. Your argument also denies the Black women her own agency and considers the issue to be wholly a matter of the man’s preference.”
Sensible people don’t demand mathematical proof (which, by the way, isn’t nearly as certain as mathematicians like to pretend). And I would certainly never claim to have such a level of proof. Proof sufficient to accept the truth and move on? I think this is WAYYYY more than good enough.
Read about the Chinese in Mississippi. The minute they decided they were going to stay, they decided they wanted to stay as so called white people - and they stopped marrying so called black women right then. The status difference is no less now.
Yes I understand now. You’re a subversive. A troll. See ya!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.