Posted on 09/06/2022 9:37:06 AM PDT by grundle
There is also the problem of ad valorem taxation.
Towns filled with large houses want to keep smaller housing units out, to ensure fairer school funding among various towns.
Large Houseville might have an average housing unit size of 2,000 square feet and a mil rate of .013.
Small Houseville might have an average housing unit size of 1,000 square feet and a mil rate of .020.
Large Houseville homeowners might be paying 30% more than Small Houseville homeowners on average.
If many smaller housing units get built, existing Large Houseville homeowners might pay 70% and eventually even 200% more than Small Houseville homeowners on average.
Not every household that lives in a large house has a good income. In fact a very large percentage don’t. Joe Biden’s inflation has hit many old folks hard.
I should add that in the US suburbs and widespread ‘free’ public schooling came about at about the same time, the 1840s.
There were suburbs (Islington, Cheswick, etc.) in London way before then.
Dems will just load them with illegals.
I think Texas should send a few busloads of “migrants” to each of those nimbyvilles.
“it cannot be built with its own septic and well system”
The French use microstations d’epuration rather than septic tanks.
“Affordability is a major deterrent to the many teachers in Greenwich who would like to live in town”
People have commuted into NYC from its suburbs in very large numbers since about 1920s, when the top-end suburbs were largely built. If a CEO can commute, so can a teacher.
What people think are close-in suburbs were in fact built out in what was the sticks.
Chevy Chase, Maryland comes to mind.
Workers commuted into DC using the trolley.
Developers around 1900 would buy a comparatively cheap piece of land and run trolley tracks to it.
Might succeed if the complex is surrounded by a 15 foot barbwire fence with gate guards and towers.
I’m sure that is not correct. The homeless guests would present a voucher from the city. I don’t know the value of the proposed voucher.
I have a lefty relative that lives in this town:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton,_Massachusetts
94% white
4%+ asian
0.5% black
George Wallace would have been proud!
Don’t forget “Terraces.”
100%
The big problem with Section 8 is that the moms might want to move away from the “trouble” — but then the trouble comes visiting. Nephews from “the hood”. Their kids get friends from “the hood” to “keep it real”.
So now “the hood” has a base of operations surrounded by soft suburban targets who are not used to guarding against crime...
Suburban antipathy to density is why suburbia exists. Morons. Not everyone likes high-density areas. Every moron out there who pushes for high-density affordable housing needs to be forced to live in high-density affordable housing for a minimum of five years before they can start to shill for it again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don’t disagree with any part of your post. However the fact is those who are pushing for what we want no part of could care less about what we like or don’t like. Their goal is to cram everyone into Soviet-style ghettos where they can be controlled like animals in a zoo. As the fascist Klaus Schwab has said, the goal is to eliminate all property rights and have every person on the planet under the absolute control of world government, i.e., the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Happens every day, unless there’s weather or an accident or car trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.