Posted on 12/13/2022 10:44:42 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
But a certain supreme Court justice said she was not a biologist as a reason why she could not define what a woman is.
I wonder how farmers and ranchers are able to tell which of their animals are male or female. I’m sure not all farmers and ranchers have a degrees in biology. Yet somehow they are able to figure it out. I wonder how they do that.
Sarcasm......
Here is what they can’t change:
XX
XY
FACT.
Then we’ll change the definition of a Cambridge dictionary.
ah, but , now what is the definition of a female or a male ?
-fJRoberts-
Idiots.
“an adult who lives and identifies as female though they...
“‘now states that a woman is “an adult who lives and identifies as female’
When are they going to define an adult?
wy69
XY chromosomal DNA is male but can be identified as being female.
XX chromosomal DNA is female but can be identified as male.
Makes perfect illogical sense, not to mention virtually impossible.
Now if they can ever transition from the XY strands to XX (and vise versa) on the cellular level, well now we would have something really special.
“When are they going to define an adult?”
That’s easy:
“Adult: a human being who is over the age of 18 and doesn’t vote Democrat.”
Since we can’t see chromosomes, we have to inspect the nether regions of the body.
If there is a tallywhacker there your sex is MALE!
It there is no tallywhacker there your sex is FEMALE!
Stop using the word “gender,” to identify sex. It is a word that is used in some languages that assign “gender” to objects, not the science of biology!
Fast forward to today, my betters tell me I don't know anything anymore, least of which that which is obvious.
“Adult: a human being who is over the age of 18 and doesn’t vote Democrat.”
Not if you ask a liberal. They think they are the only ones capable of making all the calls for everyone, adult enough. So your definition is good for half the people in the country, right or wrong.
wy69
As was discussed a couple days ago, it’s time to scrounge around thrift shops for older editions of dictionaries, encyclopedia sets, etc.
What they have done is to relegate themselves to irrelevant.
“Not if you ask a liberal.”
But we don’t ask children their opinions, because they’re stupid.
Really?
These large dictionaries appeal to people who have a love for
words. Changing thousands of years old definitions by weirdo
woke flakes isn’t going to increase a love for the company
that will betray 99% of the populace’s understanding of what
a man and woman are.
In one hundred years, historians will be unearthing the bones
of people and finding only two sexes. Male and female, as
they were born.
Cambridge Dictionary was already destined for the dustbin of history and is now following the going broke - get desperate - go woke - go more broke model.
“Since we can’t see chromosomes, we have to inspect the nether regions of the body.”
Well, they are small - but chromosomes can be seen.
“If there is a tallywhacker there your sex is MALE!
It there is no tallywhacker there your sex is FEMALE!”
External genitalia usually reflect the genetic makeup, but there are anomalous situations where they don’t.
“Stop using the word “gender,” to identify sex. It is a word that is used in some languages that assign “gender” to objects, not the science of biology!”
I don’t use “gender” to identify sex. FWIW, my degree is in “the science of biology”.
It’s Gender not Sex. It’s what’s between your legs that defines Gender - not what’s between your ears!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.