Judge partially blocks North Carolina abortion pill regulations

Live Action News ^ | May 7, 2024 | Bridget Sielicki

[Morgana]

Another judge again

[cymbeline]

“Another judge again”

You are arguing that abortions should not be made easy.

I agree with you opinion on abortions but generally speaking, individual states should be able to contest an FDA regulation.

[Morgana]

If the states decide they don’t want abortion then that also goes for the abortion pill.

A lot of times the abortion pill fails and then what? They have to do a surgical one. Most ER doctors don’t want to become abortions.

When ER doctors start to complain then things will change.

[TheBattman]

Someone explain to me how a FEDERAL judge has the authority to disrupt a State law dealing with abortion... when the SCOTUS already said it is a STATE issue - PERIOD....????

[curious7]

The states need to say 10th amendment - and give these ‘feral judges’ decisions the same respect the BiteMe admin gave to the SCOTUS decision on forgiveness of student loans.

[cymbeline]

“If the states decide they don’t want abortions then that also goes for the abortion pill.”

I’d just say each individual state can fight over the issues that fall under the umbrella of abortion. A state’s decisions are for only that state.

I fear a federal government that has too much power over states.

Tonight’s news mentioned a threat by the Federal Department of Education to some school district that it could lose federal handouts if it doesn’t obey their rules.

I’d prefer that school districts not be addicted to Federal handouts.

[Svartalfiar]

"North Carolina cannot second-guess the FDA’s explicit judgment on how to manage risks from and safely prescribe, dispense, and administer REMS drugs, including mifepristone,” Eagles wrote.

And yet it took a Constitutional Amendment to ban alcohol. Where in the Constitution did they possibly forget to write 'alcohol' where they remember to write 'drugs'?