Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MARKS OF THE NEW BIRTH
Rnmomof7 | 9/5/01 | John Wesley

Posted on 09/05/2001 2:47:45 PM PDT by RnMomof7

THE MARKS OF THE NEW BIRTH

"So is every one that is born of the Spirit." John 3:8.

1. How is every one that is "born of the Spirit," -- that is, born again, -- born of God? What is meant by the being born again, the being born of God, or being born of the Spirit? What is implied in the being a son or a child of God, or having the Spirit of adoption? That these privileges, by the free mercy of God, are ordinarily annexed to baptism (which is thence termed by our Lord in a preceding verse, the being "born of water and of the Spirit") we know; but we would know what these privileges are: What is the new birth?

2. Perhaps it is not needful to give a definition of this, seeing the Scripture gives none. But as the question is of the deepest concern to every child of man; since, "except a man be born again," born of the Spirit, "he cannot see the kingdom of God;" I propose to lay down the marks of it in the plainest manner, just as I find them laid down in Scripture.

I. 1. The First of these, and the foundation of all the rest, is faith. So St. Paul, "Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus." (Gal. 3:26.) So St. John, "To them gave he power" (_exousian_, right or privilege, it might rather be translated) "to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name; which were born," when they believed, "not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh," not by natural generation, "nor of the will of man," like those children adopted by men, in whom no inward change is thereby wrought, "but of God." (John 1:12,13.) And again in his General Epistle, "Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God." (1 John 5:1.)

2. But it is not a barely notional or speculative faith that is here spoken of by the Apostles. It is not a bare assent to this proposition, Jesus is the Christ; nor indeed to all the propositions contained in our creed, or in the Old and New Testament. It is not merely an assent to any or all these credible things, as credible. To say this, were to say (which who could hear?) that the devils were born of God; for they have this faith. They, trembling, believe, both that Jesus is the Christ, and that all Scripture, having been given by inspiration of God, is true as God is true. It is not only an assent to divine truth, upon the testimony of God, or upon the evidence of miracles; for they also heard the words of his mouth, and knew him to be a faithful and true witness. They could not but receive the testimony he gave, both of himself, and of the Father which sent him. They saw likewise the mighty works which he did, and thence believed that he "came forth from God." Yet, nevertheless this faith, they are still "reserved in chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day."

3. For all this is no more than a dead faith. The true, living, Christian faith, which whosoever hath, is born of God, is not only an assent, an act of the understanding; but a disposition, which God hath wrought in his heart; "a sure trust and confidence in God, that, through the merits of Christ, his sins are forgiven, and he reconciled to the favor of God." This implies, that a man first renounce himself; that, in order to be "found in Christ," to be accepted through him, he totally rejects all "confidence in the flesh;" that, "having nothing to pay," having no trust in his own works or righteousness of any kind, he comes to God as a lost, miserable, self-destroyed, self-condemned, undone, helpless sinner; as one whose mouth is utterly stopped, and who is altogether "guilty before God." Such a sense of sin, (commonly called despair, by those who speak evil of the things they know not,) together with a full conviction, such as no words can express, that of Christ only cometh our salvation, and an earnest desire of that salvation, must precede a living faith, a trust in Him, who "for us paid our ransom by his death, and fulfilled the law of his life." This faith then, whereby we are born of God, is "not only a belief of all the articles of our faith, but also a true confidence of the mercy of God, through our Lord Jesus Christ."

4. An immediate and constant fruit of this faith whereby we are born of God, a fruit which can in no wise be separated from it, no, not for an hour, is power over sin; -- power over outward sin of every kind; over every evil word and work; for wheresoever the blood of Christ is thus applied, it "purgeth the conscience from dead works;" -- and over inward sin; for it purifieth the heart from every unholy desire and temper. This fruit of faith St. Paul has largely described, in the sixth chapter of his Epistle to the Romans. "How shall we," saith he, "who" by faith "are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"Our old man is crucified with Christ, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin." -- "Likewise, reckon ye yourselves to be dead unto sin, but alive unto God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Let not sin therefore reign" even "in your mortal body,"but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead."For sin shall not have dominion over you. -- God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, -- but being made free," -- the plain meaning is, God be thanked that though ye were, in time past, the servants of sin, yet now -- "being free from sin, ye are become the servants of righteousness."

5. The same invaluable privilege of the sons of God is as strongly asserted by St. John; particularly with regard to the former branch of it, namely, power over outward sin. After he had been crying out, as one astonished at the depth of the riches of the goodness of God, -- "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God! Beloved, now are we the sons of God: And it doth not yet appear what we shall be; but we know, that when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is;" (1 John 3:1, etc..) -- he soon adds, "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: And he cannot sin, because he is born of God." (1 John 3:9.) But some men will say, "True: Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin habitually." Habitually! Whence is that? I read it not. It is not written in the Book. God plainly saith, "He doth not commit sin;" and thou addest, habitually! Who art thou that mendest the oracles of God? -- that "addest to the words of this book?" Beware, I beseech thee, lest God "add to thee all the plagues that are written therein!" especially when the comment thou addest is such as quite swallows up the text: So that by this _methodeia planEs_, artful method of deceiving, the precious promise is utterly lost; by this _kybeia anthrOpOn_, tricking and shuffling of men, the word of God is made of none effect. O beware, thou that thus takest from the words of this book, that, taking away the whole meaning and spirit from them, leavest only what may indeed be termed a dead letter, lest God take away thy part out of the book of life!

6. Suffer we the Apostle to interpret his own words, by the whole tenor of his discourse. In the fifth verse of this chapter, he had said, "Ye know that he," Christ, "was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin." What is the inference he draws from this? "Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not. Whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him." (1 John 3:6.) To his enforcement of this important doctrine, he premises an highly necessary caution: "Little children, let no man deceive you;" (1 John 3:7;) for many will endeavor so to do; to persuade you that you may be unrighteous, that you may commit sin, and yet be children of God! "He that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning." Then follows, "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: And he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this," adds the Apostle, "the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil." By this plain mark (the committing or not committing sin) are they distinguished from each other. To the same effect are those words in his fifth chapter, "We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not." (1 John 3:18.)

7. Another fruit of this living faith is peace. For, "being justified by faith," having all our sins blotted out, "we have peace with God, through our Lord Jesus Christ." (Rom. 5:1.) This indeed our Lord himself, the night before his death, solemnly bequeathed to all his followers: "Peace," saith he, "I leave with you;" (you who "believe in God," and "believe also in me;") "my peace I give unto you:"Not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." (John 14:27.) And again, "These things have I spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace." (John 16:33.) This is that "peace of God which passeth all understanding," that serenity of soul which it hath not entered into the heart of a natural man to conceive, and which it is not possible for even the spiritual man to utter. And it is a peace which all the powers of earth and hell are unable to take from him. Waves and storms beat upon it, but they shake it not; for it is founded upon a rock. It keepeth the hearts and minds of the children of God, at all times and in all places. Whether they are in ease or in pain, in sickness or health, in abundance or want, they are happy in God. In every state they have learned to be content, yea, to give thanks unto God through Christ Jesus; being well assured that "whatever is, is best," because it is His will concerning them: So that in all the vicissitudes of life their "heart standeth fast, believing in the Lord."

II. 1. A Second scriptural mark of those who are born of God, is hope. Thus St. Peter, speaking to all the children of God who were then scattered abroad, saith, "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which, according to his abundant mercy, hath begotten us again unto a lively hope." (1 Peter 1:3.) _elpida zOsan_, a lively or living hope, saith the Apostle; because there is also a dead hope, as well as a dead faith; a hope which is not from God, but from the enemy of God and man; -- as evidently appears by its fruits; for, as it is the offspring of pride, so it is the parent of every evil word and work; whereas, every man that hath in him this living hope, is "holy as He that calleth him is holy:" Every man that can truly say to his brethren in Christ, "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and we shall see him as he is,"purifieth himself, even as He is pure."

2. This hope implies, First, the testimony of our own spirit or conscience, that we walk "in simplicity and godly sincerity;" Secondly, the testimony of the Spirit of God, "bearing witness with," or to, "our spirit, that we are the children of God," "and if children, then heirs, heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ."

3. Let us well observe what is here taught us by God himself, touching this glorious privilege of his children. Who is it that is here said to bear witness? Not our spirit only, but another; even the Spirit of God: He it is who "beareth witness with our spirit." What is it he beareth witness of? "That we are the children of God,"and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ;" (Rom. 8:16, 17;) "if so be that we suffer with him," if we deny ourselves, if we take up our cross daily, if we cheerfully endure persecution or reproach for his sake, "that we may also be glorified together." And in whom doth the Spirit of God bear this witness? In all who are the children of God. By this very argument does the Apostle prove, in the preceding verses, that they are so: "As many," saith he, "as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God."For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!" It follows, "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God." (8:14-16.)

4. The variation of the phrase in the fifteenth verse is worthy our observation: "Ye have received the Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!" Ye, as many as are the sons of God, have, in virtue of your sonship, received that selfsame Spirit of Adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father: We, the Apostles, Prophets, Teachers, (for so the word may not improperly be understood,) we, through whom you have believed, the "ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God." As we and you have one Lord, so we have one Spirit: As we have one faith, so we have one hope also. We and you are sealed with one "Spirit of promise," the earnest of your and of our inheritance: The same Spirit bearing witness with your and with our spirit, "that we are the children of God." (Rom. 8:14-16).

5. And thus is the Scripture fulfilled, "Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted." For it is easy to believe, that though sorrow may precede this witness of God's Spirit with our spirit; (indeed must, in some degree, while we groan under fear, and a sense of the wrath of God abiding on us;) yet, as soon as any man feeleth it in himself, his "sorrow is turned into joy." Whatever his pain may have been before; yet, as soon as that "hour is come, he remembereth the anguish no more, for joy" that he is born of God. It may be, many of you have now sorrow, because you are "aliens from the commonwealth of Israel;" because you are conscious to yourselves that you have not this Spirit; that you are "without hope and without God in the world." But when the Comforter is come, "then your heart shall rejoice;" yea, "your joy shall be full," and "that joy no man taketh from you." (John 16:22.) "We joy in God," will ye say, "through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement;"by whom we have access into this grace," this state of grace, of favor, or reconciliation with God, "wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God." (Rom. 5:2.) "Ye," saith St. Peter, whom God hath "begotten again unto a lively hope, are kept by the power of God unto salvation: Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations; that the trial of your faith may be found unto praise, and honor, and glory, at the appearing of Jesus Christ: In whom, though now ye see him not, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory." (1 Peter 1:5, etc..) Unspeakable indeed! It is not for the tongue of man to describe this joy in the Holy Ghost. It is "the hidden manna, which no man knoweth, save he that receiveth it." But this we know, it not only remains, but overflows, in the depth of affliction. "Are the comforts of God small" with his children, when all earthly comforts fail? Not so. But when sufferings most abound, the comforts of his Spirit do much more abound; insomuch that the sons of God "laugh at destruction when it cometh;" at want, pain, hell, and the grave; as knowing Him who "hath the keys of death and hell," and will shortly "cast them into the bottomless pit;" as hearing even now the great voice out of heaven, saying, "Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes, and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain; for the former things are passed away." (Rev. 21:3, 4.)

III. 1. A Third scriptural mark of those who are born of God, and the greatest of all, is love; even "the love of God shed abroad in their hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto them." (Rom. 5:5.) "Because they are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son in their hearts, crying, Abba, Father!" (Gal. 4:6.) By this Spirit, continually looking up to God as their reconciled and loving Father, they cry to him for their daily bread, for all things needful, whether for their souls or bodies. They continually pour out their hearts before him, knowing "they have the petitions which they ask of him." (1 John 5:15.) Their delight is in him. He is the joy of their heart; their "shield," and their "exceeding great reward." The desire of their soul is toward him; it is their "meat and drink to do his will;" and they are "satisfied as with marrow and fatness, while their mouth praiseth him with joyful lips." (Psalm 63:5.)

2. And, in this sense also, "every one who loveth him that begat, loveth him that is begotten of him." (1 John 5:1.) His spirit rejoiceth in God his Savior. He "loveth the Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity." He is so "joined unto the Lord," as to be one spirit. His soul hangeth upon Him, and chooseth Him as altogether lovely, "the chiefest among ten thousand." He knoweth, he feeleth what that means, "My Beloved is mine, and I am his." (Song 2:16.) "Thou art fairer than the children of men; full of grace are thy lips, because God hath anointed thee for ever!" (Psalm 45:2.)

3. The necessary fruit of this love of God is the love of our neighbor; of every soul which God hath made; not excepting our enemies; not excepting those who are now "despitefully using and persecuting us;" -- a love whereby we love every man as ourselves; as we love our own souls. Nay, our Lord has expressed it still more strongly, teaching us to "love one another even as He hath loved us." Accordingly, the commandment written in the hearts of all those that love God, is no other than this, "As I have loved you, so love ye one another." Now, "herein perceive we the love of God, in that he laid down his life for us." (1 John 3:16.) "We ought," then, as the Apostle justly infers, "to lay down our lives for the brethren." If we feel ourselves ready to do this, then do we truly love our neighbor. Then "we know that we have passed from death unto life, because we" thus "love the brethren." (1 John 3:14.) "Hereby know we" that we are born of God, that we "dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his" loving "Spirit." (1 John 4:13.) For "love is of God; and every one that" thus "loveth is born of God, and knoweth God." (1 John 4:7.)

4. But some may possibly ask, "Does not the Apostle say, 'This is the love of God, that we keep his commandments?'" (1 John 5:3.) Yea, and this is the love of our neighbor also, in the same sense as it is the love of God. But what would you infer from hence? that the keeping the outward commandments is all that is implied in loving God with all your heart, with all your mind, and soul, and strength, and in loving your neighbor as yourself? that the love of God is not an affection of the soul, but merely an outward service? and that the love of our neighbor is not a disposition of heart, but barely a course of outward works? To mention so wild an interpretation of the Apostle's words, is sufficiently to confute it. The plain indisputable meaning of that text is, -- this is the sign or proof of the love of God, of our keeping the first and great commandment, to keep the rest of his commandments. For true love, if it be once shed abroad in our heart, will constrain us so to do; since, whosoever loves God with all his heart, cannot but serve him with all his strength.

5. A Second fruit then of the love of God (so far as it can be distinguished from it) is universal obedience to him we love, and conformity to his will; obedience to all the commands of God, internal and external; obedience of the heart and of the life; in every temper, and in all manner of conversation. And one of the tempers most obviously implied herein, is, the being "zealous of good works;" the hungering and thirsting to do good, in every possible kind, unto all men; the rejoicing to "spend and be spent for them," for every child of man; not looking for any recompence in this world, but only in the resurrection of the just.

IV. 1. Thus have I plainly laid down those marks of the new birth which I find laid down in Scripture. Thus doth God himself answer that weighty question, What is it to be born of God? Such, if the appeal be made to the oracles of God, is "every one that is born of the Spirit." This it is, in the judgment of the Spirit of God, to be a son or a child of God: It is, so to believe in God, through Christ, as "not to commit sin," and to enjoy at all times, and in all places, that "peace of God which passeth all understanding." It is, so to hope in God through the Son of his love, as to have not only the "testimony of a good conscience," but also the Spirit of God "bearing witness with your spirits, that ye are the children of God;" whence cannot but spring the rejoicing in Him, through whom ye "have received the atonement." It is, so to love God, who hath thus loved you, as you never did love any creature: So that ye are constrained to love all men as yourselves; with a love not only ever burning in your hearts, but flaming out in all your actions and conversations, and making your whole life one "labor of love," one continued obedience to those commands, "Be ye merciful, as God is merciful;"Be ye holy, as I the Lord am holy:"Be ye perfect, as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

2. Who then are ye that are thus born of God? Ye "know the things which are given to you of God." Ye well know that ye are the children of God, and "can assure your hearts before him." And every one of you who has observed these words cannot but feel, and know of a truth, whether at this hour, (answer to God, and not to man!) you are thus a child of God or no. The question is not, what you was made in baptism; (do not evade;) but, What are you now? Is the Spirit of adoption now in your heart? To your own heart let the appeal be made. I ask not, whether you was born of water and of the Spirit; but are you now the temple of the Holy Ghost which dwelleth in you? I allow you was "circumcised with the circumcision of Christ;" (as St. Paul emphatically terms baptism;) but does the Spirit of Christ and of glory now rest upon you? Else "your circumcision is become uncircumcision."

3 . Say not then in your heart, "I was once baptized, therefore I am now a child of God." Alas, that consequence will by no means hold. How many are the baptized gluttons and drunkards, the baptized liars and common swearers, the baptized railers and evil-speakers, the baptized whoremongers, thieves, extortioners? What think you? Are these now the children of God? Verily, I say unto you, whosoever you are, unto whom any one of the preceding characters belongs, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the works of your father ye do." Unto you I call, in the name of Him whom you crucify afresh, and in his words to your circumcised predecessors, "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"

4. How, indeed, except ye be born again! For ye are now dead in trespasses and sins. To say, then, that ye cannot be born again, that there is no new birth but in baptism, is to seal you all under damnation, to consign you to hell, without help, without hope. And perhaps some may think this just and right. In their zeal for the Lord of hosts, they may say, "Yea, cut off the sinners, the Amalekites! Let these Gibeonites be utterly destroyed! They deserve no less." No; nor I, nor you. Mine and your desert, as well as theirs, is hell; and it is mere mercy, free, undeserved mercy, that we are not now in unquenchable fire. You will say, "But we are washed;" we were born again "of water and of the Spirit." So were they: This, therefore, hinders not at all, but that ye may now be even as they. Know ye not, that "what is highly esteemed of men is an abomination in the sight of God?" Come forth, ye "saints of the world," ye that are honored of men, and see who will cast the first stone at them, at these wretches not fit to live upon the earth, these common harlots, adulterers, murderers. Only learn ye first what that meaneth, "He that hateth his brother is a murderer." (1 John 3:15.) "He that looketh on a woman, to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." (Matt. 5:28.) "Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God?" (James 4:4.)

5. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye" also "must be born again."Except ye" also "be born again, ye cannot see the kingdom of God." Lean no more on the staff of that broken reed, that ye were born again in baptism. Who denies that ye were then made children of God, and heirs of the kingdom of heaven? But, nevertheless this, ye are now children of the devil. Therefore ye must be born again. And let not Satan put it into your heart to cavil at a word, when the thing is clear. Ye have heard what are the marks of the children of God: All ye who have them not on your souls, baptized or unbaptized, must needs receive them, or without doubt ye will perish everlastingly. And if ye have been baptized, your only hope is this, -- that those who were made the children of God by baptism, but are now the children of the devil, may yet again receive "power to become the sons of God;" that they may receive again what they have lost, even the "Spirit of adoption, crying in their hearts, Abba, Father!"

Amen, Lord Jesus! May every one who prepareth his heart yet again to seek thy face, receive again that Spirit of adoption, and cry out, "Abba, Father!" Let him now again have power so to believe in thy name as to become a child of God; as to know and feel he hath "redemption in thy blood, even the forgiveness of sins;" and that he "cannot commit sin, because he is born of God." Let him be now "begotten again unto a living hope," so as to "purify himself as thou art pure;" and "because he is a son," let the Spirit of love and of glory rest upon him, cleansing him "from all filthiness of flesh and spirit," and teaching him to "perfect holiness in the fear of God!"


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: All
I haven't had much time to participate lately, but keep me BUMPED. Thanks.
21 posted on 09/06/2001 6:27:29 AM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I would have to say that the only drawback is that it just doesn't contain enough insults and condemnation to be suitable for extended quotes here at FR. You should convey to the author that if he wants to be a real Calvinist, he's just got to tell more people they're ignorant and damned. That's what works best. If he needs some pointers, you can invite him here.

GW...the best humor has its base in truth! Thanks for a laugh before my 1st coffee!

Did you try my link?

22 posted on 09/06/2001 6:44:24 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Miss ya Jerry..will keep you bumped
23 posted on 09/06/2001 6:45:10 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Howz everything Rn?
24 posted on 09/06/2001 6:47:39 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7, jude24
Sorry to intrude on your Marks Of The New Birth topic but I just exported this from the PDF, reformatted in Word and then edited it in HTML. It's something in the free-will vs. predestination argument that I don't think anyone has ever presented before. Just an outstanding sample of Walt Svarczkopf's teaching work. Thanks again, jude24, for this PDF document. I hope some of the Arminians/Wesleyans will take some time to examine it.

Verse

Who God Wills to Save

How God Wills to Save

All

Some

N/A

Free Will

Election

N/A

Ezekiel 33:11

9

3

1

12

 

 

Matthew 7:21

 

7

4

3

3

4

Matthew 12:50

2

7

1

7

3

2

Matthew 18:14

10

2

 

1

8

5

John 1:13

 

6

3

 

13

 

John 3:8

 

10

3

 

9

3

John 3:16-17

11

1

 

9

 

 

John 5:21

 

11

1

 

13

 

John 6:38-40

 

6

4

3

6

1

Acts 22:14

 

8

4

1

8

1

Galatians 1:4

1

4

5

 

9

2

Ephesians 1:5-11

1

11

 

1

13

 

1 Timothy 2:4

13

 

 

3

5

4

2 Peter 3:9

13

 

 

7

3

1

Revelation 22:17

2

5

4

8

3

 

Totals

62

81

31

54

96

23


So, Wesleyans, how do you answer this evidence for the preponderance of the teaching of election over the teaching of free will?
25 posted on 09/06/2001 6:59:48 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jude24, the_doc
#17: "..nothing could separate us from him"

Notice that little word "us"?

Does this "us" include anyone whom God doesn't draw/drag to Jesus to give him/her *His* "saving faith"?

Jesus: "NONE can come to me unless my Father draws (drags) him ......"

26 posted on 09/06/2001 7:05:03 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Whosoever will" means "Whosoever is dragged". :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

"...We identified the following general trends in the chart above?
Sorry. Forgot the explanation of the columns: N/A=Not Accomplished.
27 posted on 09/06/2001 7:06:57 AM PDT by George W. Bush (oops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
pretty good..I havent forgot to pray :>)) hope everything is being resolved!
28 posted on 09/06/2001 9:18:37 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Did you try my link? If you mean the one to CBD, yes. The prices really are very good and the selection is broad. I noted they offer a complete Spurgeon collection (70 some volumes) and a complete Calvin collection, both on CDROM. I'm more tempted toward those. However, I think I might get the $30 updated CCEL.org CDROM first. The new version will be out in October. It has Calvin's commentaries and a lot of other really good material on it. The price is pretty hard to beat when you start looking at some of these pricey Christian CDROMs.

Since you mentioned the Commentaries, I thought I'd post a bit more from Calvin on that verse. I hadn't bothered before but thought that a few Calvinists and Wesleyans around here are sorely in need of understanding more fully exactly what Calvin found in Hebrews 10. I think Calvin and the Reformation scholars had it right. The Westminster Confession is very much in agreement with this.

APPENDIX K 2
Chapter 10:14. He hath perfected, etc. The word simply means to complete, to finish, to perfect; and it depends on the context what that completion or perfection means. To perfect the sanctified or the expiated, or those atoned for, was completely to free them from the imputation of sin, to make them fully clear from guilt, or in other words, fully to take away their sins, which was never done by the sacrifices of the law, verse 11. This is the point here handled. Stuart gives the real meaning by the following free translation, -- "By one offering, then, he hath fully accomplished for ever what was needed by those for whom expiation is (was) made."

The perfecting "for ever" by one offering in this verse, proves that "for ever," [Greek text omitted], in verse 12, is to be connected with the offering of one sacrifice, and not with the sitting on God's right hand; the verse may be thus rendered, --

12. "But he, having offered one sacrifice for sins for perpetuity, (or, according to Beza and Stuart, 'one perpetual sacrifice for sins,') sat down on the right hand of God, henceforth waiting until his enemies be made his footstool."

Some copies have [Greek text omitted] -- "he;" and some, [Greek text omitted] -- "this." If the latter be adopted, it ought not to be rendered "this man," but "this priest," such being the word used before. As one sacrifice is opposed to many sacrifices, so a perpetual sacrifice, that is, a sacrifice perpetually efficacious, is opposed to those sacrifices which were often made.


By comparison, Wesley's Notes say of 10:14 the following, a meager offering but still pretty orthodox:

Verse 14. He hath perfected them for ever - That is, has done all that was needful in order to their full reconciliation with God.
Calvin: home run   Wesley: bunted

29 posted on 09/06/2001 10:01:48 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Wesley's stinginess did not merit a color table)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: drot, jude24, Matchett-PI
Not a very convincing response, I notice.

But I was correct. Most churchgoers in our day are not born again. Think about that.

The mess the Pharisees were in is presented in the Bible as a spiritual warning to us. They hated Jesus' message, one of the most important elements of which was that the majority of the professed followers of Jehovah were no more regenerate than my dog.

And Paul is telling us in Romans 9 that this was no accident.

30 posted on 09/06/2001 11:13:36 AM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: the_doc, drot
but You can ignore it, it won't change the Truth. So, ignoring it is dangerous.

From a Calvinist's viewpoint, why? How does this statement have any meaning to a Calvinist? We are either Elect, or reprobate--correct? If we are Elect, we WILL go to heaven--OTOH if we are reprobate, we WILL go to hell. There is nothing we can do about it. So--

Why is it dangerous?

31 posted on 09/06/2001 11:34:20 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Your post 30 Just proves what I said about you NEVER BEING WRONG at least in your sight.

It doesn't deserve the time it takes to reply it is so LIMP

regards

don

32 posted on 09/06/2001 12:15:49 PM PDT by drot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
(Wesley's stinginess did not merit a color table)

Naw but he did have a crown to throw at Gods feet *grin*

Did you ever look it up in Adam Clarke? He is on God rules .com site...much more indepth than Wesley and readible.

thanks for the table..

33 posted on 09/06/2001 1:22:32 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: the_doc cc: RnMomof7, jude24, fortheDeclaration, drot, Calvinists
I am glad you are moving away from RnMom and beginning to focus on others. That is good news for her, but the others need to be forewarned that you will very soon be every bit as nasty with them.

You have been quite predatory with RnMom. (I refer to On the Trinity post #4, #21, #67, #130, 184, etc., and that is just on the previous thread.) You are demanding complete control over her mind in religious matters, with the alternative being eternity in hell if she refuses. This goes far beyond "contending earnestly for the faith", far beyond the "foolishness of preaching", and far beyond trying to win souls to Christ, far into forbidden territory.

You call her a heretic, a false teacher. That is a dime-a-dozen everyday accusation around here from your fellow Calvinists, but buried in the midst of your long, malevolent posts it appears to carry a much heavier connotation. It wasn't so many centuries ago that evil men were burning at the stake those they charged with heresy, trying to enforce their orthodoxy through terror. Thankfully no one can use such means in this free country, so long as our freedoms are protected from abusive government and illegal individual acts, but you are nonetheless earnestly trying to enforce your orthodoxy, hoping to make God -- or rather the idolatrous god of the Calvinists, and the prospect of eternity in hell, your enforcer.

The other Calvinists posting here need to have enough discernment to know the difference between the preaching of the Gospel and predatory mind-control behavior. What is mind-control over the Internet if not this? They need to think about the need to discipline their leader when he gets way out of line. The Democrats needed to discipline their leader -- remove him from office -- and wouldn't.

Sometimes it is the medical professionals, the caregivers, who are the last to realize that they are in need of professional help.

Please, doc, do your best to convince RnMom, and the others, to their satisfaction, that you are not in the mind-control business. You can start by letting others know that they can disagree with you without accusations, attacks, and heavy warnings of eternal damnation. As you exhort all to come to Christ, tell the truth about those who already have, and acknowledge their devotion and commitment in faith to Him, even though you disagree with them on matters of doctrine.

Your #30: the majority of the professed followers of Jehovah were no more regenerate than my dog

You mean dogs don't go to heaven? :-)

30 I will greatly praise the LORD with my mouth; yea, I will praise him among the multitude.
31 For he shall stand at the right hand of the poor, to save him from those that condemn his soul. (Psalm 109:30-31)

34 posted on 09/06/2001 2:07:25 PM PDT by White Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7, George W. Bush
"Did you ever look it up in Adam Clarke? He is on God rules .com site...much more indepth than Wesley and readible.

Adam Clarke? Believe it or not, I actually have a very old set of his commentaries. They were given to me along with a very old and worn set of Matthew Henry's Commentary. On a side note......I have the Works of John Wesley as well. Sadly, as has been pointed out on these threads, the guy hated Calvinism! (i.e., the absolute sovereignty of GOD).

I will, however, have to agree with Misteh Spudgin.....uhhhh......Mr. Spurgeon, when he stated that Clarke was a dangerous, Arminian (Pelagian), "twister of the Word."

35 posted on 09/06/2001 2:14:16 PM PDT by spudgin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: spudgin
You know what spudgin?. Every cult refuses to read the literature or doctrine of other faiths..because they fear that their's can not stand the light of scruitny.

I will read the work of Wesley,Clarke,Finny,McGee,McArthur,Gill,Calvin..etc...with out fear.

You know spudgin truth isn't determined by how loud it is shouted..

Ephesians 4:15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, [even] Christ:

36 posted on 09/06/2001 2:24:57 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: drot, RnMomof7, jude24, Alas, Matchett-PI
So then the critical question is:

How does one BECOME A MEMBER OF THE FLOCK ?

The problem is, your very question is completely ignoring the obvious point of John 10:26 and also ignoring the obvious implications of John 10:16.

***

Since you think John 6:45 trumps everything I have shown you, I will start there.

The folks whom the Lord Jesus addressed in John 10:26 would not NOT LISTEN to the Father and would NOT LEARN from Him in the crucially important way of BELIEVING. Hearing with one's natural ears doesn't count for anything. The sinner has to listen and learn.

And according to 1 Corinthians 2 and 3, the person who does not even have the Spirit of regeneration will do NEITHER. The sinner needs to have his soul fully engaged in the Spiritual reception of what is merely coming into his ears and bouncing around in his spiritual empty head! Apart from the regenerating work of the Spirit--implanting Truth receptors in the soul--the gospel message saves no one at all. (Any sinner who has experienced God's startling work of regeneration should immediately realize that this ability to listen with a fully engaged soul is supernatural, not natural.)

My point, again, is that the folks whom the Lord was addressing in John 10:26 would NOT listen and learn in this crucially important way. And the Lord Jesus is telling them the reason WHY they would NOT listen and learn in this way of believing into and through the Doorway Who is Christ.

He is telling them that they were not chosen unto salvation in the first place.

This is why they experienced no legitimately regenerating power attending the message. The Lord is presenting the important matter of theological cause and effect. The Lord is ultimately telling them why they would NEVER listen and learn from God.

(Sounds like most of my Wesleyan/Arminian friends, unfortunately. Maybe some of them are just struggling in carnality, but many of them haven't even gotten to first base in the Spirit of regeneration. This would certainly explain why they can't understand Romans 9, John 6, Hebrews 10:14, Acts 13:48, or 1 Thessalonians 1:4-5 or a zillion other passages in the Bible which they don't like. I'm afraid that they have no Truth receptors. And by the very nature of the Satanic mess they are in, they don't even KNOW that they don't. Their religiosity fools them. Their vain use of the name Jesus fools them. They definitely need to sober up--somehow, some way.)

Notice how blunt this confrontation by the Lord Jesus was. It was not the Lord's completely typical approach to soteriological controversy, but He decided to be blunt in John 10:26. It was not for the good of His addressees--because nothing was going to do them any good!--but it is instructive for us. (At least, it is for me!)

Now, I realize that you are trying to imply that the addressees in John 10:26 would have become sheep by believing. Well, this would be true except for the fact that it is impossible for a non-sheep to believe the gospel. (They won't listen to God for real. You just haven't ever fully understood this. You just haven't come to grips with how bad, how incapacitating sin is.)

Oddly enough, the impossibility of a non-sheep believing the gospel is obvious even if we accept the Wesleyan/Arminian theory of election.

Why? Because the sheep in John 10 are not the saved. The sheep to whom the Lord is referring are the elect. That's different, and the difference is important. If you will so much as concede that the sheep are elect sinners rather than necessarily saved sinners, even your Wesleyan/Arminian theology cries out against the idea of a non-elect sinner being saved through true faith. (This is impossible by anyone's definition of election.)

Hold that thought for a moment.

Back to John 10:26, we definitely need to notice that the reason why the folks to whom He was speaking didn't believe the gospel is because they were not His sheep.

Everything in your theology screams out that they were not His sheep because they did not believe. But that is not the logic which Christ is presenting. You will twist His words to your peril.

You see, although there is a very real sense in which believing the gospel in a saving way does reveal a person as elect, it does not newly constitute him as elect. It saves him--and that is important!--but it doesn't secure for him the status of elect. He was already elect.

To use the language of John 10, believing the gospel may very well be said to reveal a person as one of the Lord's sheep, but it doesn't newly constitute him as a sheep. He was already a sheep.

So, John 10:26 is actually explaining John 6:45.

Now, when you go back to John 6:37, 39, and 44, you will be forced to read it without stupidly misreading v.45 in an effort to overthrow everything vv.37, 39, and 44 are OBVIOUSLY saying.

John 6:37-45, in other words, is presenting the Calvinist doctrines of TOTAL DEPRAVITY, UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION, IRRESISTIBLE GRACE, AND THE PRESERVATION/PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS. The only point which is missing--concerning the extent of the Atonement--is established elsewhere in Scripture, but it was beside the point of what the Lord was saying in John 6:37-45. (What He was saying was quite heavy enough for His audience without adding an even more mysterious doctrine!)

***

Now, let's go back to the point which we put on hold. I am referring here to the idea that the sheep in John 10 are God's elect, not God's saved.

God has a spiritually elect people, what is known elsewhere in Scriptural as a [spiritual] "Israel"--not to be confused with the literal, national Israel (see Romans 9:6 for Paul's reference to both of these "Israels").

And these elect sinners have been in His heart from before the foundation of the world. So, when we move from eternity into time itself, these sinners lost in the Fall are "like sheep [who] have gone astray" (see Isaiah 53, of course!). Gone astray? When?

I just told you. The elect went astray in the Fall.

Now, considered as sheep (Isaiah 53 again), the elect have to be found and brought into the fold of salvation. Election is not salvation. They have to be sought out and brought to God.

According to everything we know about the Good Shepherd, He has to go find them with the gospel message.

This is why the Lord said in John 10:16 "Other sheep have I and they are not of this fold. And there shall be one fold and One Shepherd."

The Lord is clearly talking about elect Gentiles. They were not even saved--since the Gospel had not yet broken out of the confines of Judea to evangelize the Gentiles--and yet they were already sheep.

So, it all hangs together beautifully. John 10:26 is merely the pivotal verse.

Notice also that inasmuch as the sheep are a metaphor for God's elect in John 10, then the doctrine of eternal security is obviously true. Therefore, the Wesleyan/Arminian "reading" of 10:28 is bunk, too.

And everything I have shown you in this post fits Romans 9 to a tee. Paul was obviously an absolute predestinarian.

Therefore, a reasonable, teachable student of God's Word should conclude that your entire theology is EVIL TRASH.

***

I realize that this is blunt. But you really need to look at John 10:26 again. It makes mincemeat of everything in your theology. And it also reveals that the Lord Jesus was pretty blunt on occasion. (For an even more blunt confrontation, see John 8:30f--another thoroughly Calvinistic passage.)

Furthermore, Paul was pretty blunt in Romans 9. Arminians hate Romans 9, and Paul doesn't seem to care that they do. By warning them concnerning Pharaoh, he is actually warning them concerning Pharaoh. {I love these fonts!)

37 posted on 09/06/2001 2:30:49 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: White Mountain, the_doc
WM, you are a Mormon, sir!

Absolutely, no truly discerning Christian, will put any spiritual stock, so to speak, in anything that you say about the Bible or spiritual matters.

I am not trying to be unfriendly with you, but you had better repent of your idolatrous religion! In fact, we(Christians) tell you that because like the Apostle, we are debtors, not because we desire to be unfriendly.

The least you could do is to quit parading yourself as a Christian. You are not! Mormonism is an altogether different religion.

I am aware of Satan's devices, though!

Historical Christianity, as has been defined for 2,000 yrs, authoritatively by Scripture, (and yes, Creeds and Confessions, as representations of what Scripture teaches, to keep the wolves out), is the completion of Judaism....... the fulfillment of long awaited promises by GOD, even from the beginning (Gen 3:15). Therefore, Christianity is not some kind of new "religion."

Mormonism, defined by Christian standards, is a bona fide cult.

38 posted on 09/06/2001 2:41:39 PM PDT by spudgin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: spudgin
It is easy to condemn..this has been posted before but you may have missed it

ON THE DEATH OF THE REV. MR. GEORGE WHITEFIELD

Preached at the Chapel in Tottenham-Court Road and at the Tabernacle, near Moorfields, on Sunday, November 18, 1770.

"Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!" Num. 23:10.

1. "Let my last end be like his!" How many of you join in this wish? Perhaps there are few of you who do not, even in this numerous congregation! And O that this wish may rest upon your minds! -- that it may not die away till your souls also are lodged "where the wicked cease from troubling, and where the weary are at rest!"

2. An elaborate exposition of the text will not be expected on this occasion. It would detain you too long from the sadly- pleasing thought of your beloved brother, friend, and pastor; yea, and father too: for how many are here whom he hath "begotten in the Lord!" Will it not, then, be more suitable to your inclinations, as well as to this solemnity, directly to speak of this man of God, whom you have so often heard speaking in this place? -- the end of whose conversation ye know, "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and to-day, and for ever." And may we not,

I. Observe a few particulars of his life and death?

II. Take some view of his character? and,

III. Inquire how we may improve this awful providence, his sudden removal from us?

1. We may, in the first place, observe a few particulars of his life and death. He was born at Gloucester, in December, 1714, and put to a grammar-school there, when about twelve years old. When he was seventeen, he began to be seriously religious, and served God to the best of his knowledge. About eighteen he removed to the University, and was admitted at Pembroke College in Oxford; and about a year after he became acquainted with the Methodists (so called), whom from that time he loved as his own soul.

2. By them he was convinced that we "must be born again," or outward religion will profit us nothing. He joined with them in fasting on Wednesdays and Fridays; in visiting the sick and the prisoners; and in gathering up the very fragments of time, that no moment might be lost: and he changed the course of his studies; reading chiefly such books as entered into the heart of religion, and led directly to an experimental knowledge of Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.

3. He was soon tried as with fire. Not only his reputation was lost, and some of his dearest friends forsook him; but he was exercised with inward trials, and those of the severest kind. Many nights he lay sleepless upon his bed; many days, prostrate on the ground. But after he had groaned several months under "the spirit of bondage," God was pleased to remove the heavy load, by giving him "the Spirit of adoption;" enabling him through a living faith, to lay hold on "the Son of His Love."

4. However, it was thought needful, for the recovery of his health, which was much impaired, that he should go into the country. He accordingly went to Gloucester, where God enabled him to awaken several young persons. These soon formed themselves into a little society, and were some of the first- fruits of his labor. Shortly after, he began to read, twice or thrice a week, to some poor people in the town; and every day to read to and pray with the prisoners in the county jail.

5. Being now about twenty-one years of age, he was solicited to enter into holy orders. Of this he was greatly afraid, being deeply sensible of his own insufficiency. But the Bishop himself sending for him, and telling him, "Though I had purposed to ordain none under three-and-twenty, yet I will ordain you whenever you come" -- and several other providential circumstances concurring -- he submitted, and was ordained on Trinity Sunday, 1736. The next Sunday he preached to a crowded auditory, in the church wherein he was baptized. The week following he returned to Oxford, and took his Bachelor's degree: and he was now fully employed; the care of the prisoners and the poor lying chiefly on him.

39 posted on 09/06/2001 2:46:58 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

6. But it was not long before he was invited to London, to serve the cure of a friend going into the country. He continued there two months, lodging in the Tower, reading prayers in the chapel twice a week, catechizing and preaching once, beside visiting the soldiers in the barracks and the infirmary. He also read prayers every evening at Wapping chapel, and preached at Ludgate prison every Tuesday. While he was here, letters came from his friends in Georgia, which made him long to go and help them: but not seeing his call clear, at the appointed time he returned to his little charge at Oxford, where several youths met daily at his room, to build up each other in their most holy faith.

7. But he was quickly called from hence again, to supply the cure of Dummer, in Hampshire. Here he read prayers twice a day; early in the morning, and in the evening after the people came from work. He also daily catechized the children, and visited from house to house. He now divided the day into three parts, allotting eight hours for sleep and meals, eight for study and retirement, and eight for reading prayers, catechizing, and visiting the people. Is there a more excellent way for a servant of Christ and His Church? If not, who will "go and do likewise?"

8. Yet his mind still ran on going abroad; and being now fully convinced he was called of God thereto, he set all things in order, and, in January, 1737, went down to take leave of his friends in Gloucester. It was in this journey that God began to bless his ministry in an uncommon manner. Wherever he preached, amazing multitudes of hearers flocked together, in Gloucester, in Stonehouse, in Bath, in Bristol; so that the heat of the churches was scarce supportable: and the impressions made on the minds of many were no less extraordinary. After his return to London, while he was detained by General Oglethorpe, from week to week, and from month to month, it pleased God to bless his word still more. And he was indefatigable in his labor: generally on Sunday he preached four times, to exceeding large auditories; beside reading prayers twice or thrice, and walking to and fro often ten or twelve miles.

9. On December 28 he left London. It was on the 29th that he first preached without notes. December 30, he went on board; but it was above a month before they cleared the land. One happy effect of their very slow passage he mentions in April following: "Blessed be God, we now live very comfortably in the great cabin. We talk of little else but God and Christ; and scarce a word is heard among us when together, but what has reference to our fall in the first, and our new birth in the Second, Adam." It seems, likewise, to have been a peculiar providence, that he should spend a little time at Gibraltar; where both citizens and soldiers, high and low, young and old, acknowledged the day of their visitation.

10. From Sunday, May 7, 1738, till the latter end of August following, he "made full proof of his ministry" in Georgia, particularly at Savannah: he read prayers and expounded twice a day, and visited the sick daily. On Sunday he expounded at five in the morning; at ten read prayers and preached, and at three in the afternoon; and at seven in the evening expounded the Church Catechism. How much easier is it for our brethren in the ministry, either in England, Scotland, or Ireland, to find fault: with such a laborer in our Lord's vineyard, than to tread in his steps!

11. It was now that he observed the deplorable condition of many children here; and that God put into his heart the first thought of founding an Orphan-house, for which he determined to raise contributions in England, if God should give him a safe return thither. In December following, he did return to London; and on Sunday, January 14, 1739, he was ordained priest at Christ Church, Oxford. The next day he came to London again; and on Sunday, the 21st, preached twice. But though the churches were large, and crowded exceedingly, yet many hundreds stood in the churchyard, and hundreds more returned home. This put him upon the first thought of preaching in the open air. But when he mentioned it to some of his friends, they judged it to be mere madness: so he did not carry it into execution till after he, had left London. It was on Wednesday, February 21, that, finding all the church doors to be shut in Bristol (beside, that no church was able to contain one half of the congregation), at three in the afternoon he went to Kingswood, and preached abroad to near two thousand people. On Friday he preached there to four or five thousand; and on Sunday to, it was supposed, ten thousand! The number continually increased all the time he stayed at Bristol; and a flame of holy love was kindled, which will not easily be put out. The same was afterwards kindled in various parts of Wales, of Gloucestershire, and Worcestershire. Indeed, wherever he went, God abundantly confirmed the word of his messenger.

12. On Sunday, April 29, he preached the first time in Moorfields, and on Kennington Common; and the thousands of hearers were as quiet as they could have been in a church. Being again detained in England from month to month, he made little excursions into several counties, and received the contributions of willing multitudes for an Orphan-house in Georgia. The embargo which was now laid on the shipping gave him leisure for more journeys through various parts of England, for which many will have reason to bless God to all eternity. At length, on August 14, he embarked: but he did not land in Pennsylvania till October 30. Afterwards he went through Pennsylvania, the Jerseys, New York, Maryland, Virginia, North and South Carolina; preaching all along to immense congregations, with full as great effect as in England. On January 10, 1740, he arrived at Savannah.

13. January 29, he added three desolate orphans to near twenty which he had in his house before. The next day he laid out the ground for the house, about ten miles from Savannah. February 11, he took in four orphans more; and set out for Frederica, in order to fetch the orphans that were in the southern parts of the colony. In his return he fixed a school, both for children and grown persons, at Darien, and took four orphans thence. March 25, he laid the first stone of the Orphan-house; to which, with great propriety, he gave the name of Bethesda; a work for which the children yet unborn shall praise the Lord. He had now about forty orphans, so that there was near a hundred mouths to be fed daily. But he was "careful for nothing," casting his care on Him who feed the young ravens that call upon Him.

14. In April he made another tour through Pennsylvania, the Jerseys, and New York. Incredible multitudes flocked to hear, among whom were abundance of Negroes. In all places the greater part of the hearers were affected to an amazing degree. Many were deeply convinced of their lost state, many truly converted to God. In some places, thousands cried out aloud; many as in the agonies of death; most were drowned in tears; some turned pale as death; others were wringing their hands; others lying on the ground; others sinking into the arms of their friends; almost all lifting up their eyes, and calling for mercy.

40 posted on 09/06/2001 2:47:11 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson