Skip to comments.'Clindit'
Posted on 09/06/2001 9:18:24 PM PDT by VinnyTexEdited on 04/23/2004 12:03:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
"Clindit." The combo name has a vague but appropriate indecency to it. Even those who repudiate the parallelism are compelled to run a sort of check-off list to reassure themselves that there isn't any real comparison between Gary Condit and Bill Clinton. (And it must say something about the "legacy" of our most recent ex-president that this uncouth auction of comparable features is most forcibly suggested by mentions of the suborning of perjury and the obstruction of justice.) How far may the analogy be extended?
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
As Chris Cox mentioned when questioned regarding the stealth and pressure of the means used to delete pertinant information from the "Cox Report" -he said 'never underestimate the power of a sitting president.'
Why, do you miss them? Would you like somebody to pretend to be one?
(Rhetorical questions: an excuse to bump!)
Wellstone, Broaddrick but who was the third?
Eileen Wellstone, a British girl, when he was in Oxford. Police were informed and, because a Rhodes scholar was involved, the State Department sent someone to investigate and smooth it over. Parents decided not to press charges because it was a he said/she said thing where he claimed consensual sex. Shortly thereafter Clinton left England without completing his course.
As was my comment.
Australian media buries Clinton rape scandal
... not Clinton who "dragged the presidency through the grime." Does she also think rape
by Clinton is "personal" and its critics just "puritans"? Or is it just a ...
Topic: Clinton's Rape
www.FreeRepublic.com. Topic: Clinton's Rape Open Season On Women: Jewish World Review
3-1-99 Tony Snow Web Posted: 03/01/99 04:40:56 PST Posted by: M². ...
The War Room - Clinton Rape Info Stored in Ford Bldg.
... Clinton Rape Info Stored in Ford Bldg." PLEASE, PLEASE
CALL YOUR HOUSE "REPRESENTATIVE". ...
... 1999. Is Whitewater Sex Behind Susan's Silence? 3-24-1999.
Clinton Rape Victim Watch, 3-23-1999. 'Shecky ...
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:
... website. "Freepers" have been following her case closely ever since NBC refused to
air an exclusive interview with the alleged Clinton rape victim in January. ...
Can't help with the name but wasn't she offered a part in a tv series, one that was taped out of the country?
She never claimed rape. Said it was consensual but something she did not want to happen.
The other possibility for victim #3 is a 14 year old Little Rock girl who claimed Clinton raped her during a cocaine party. We don't know her name.
Anything like a 'senior moment'?
Talk radio covered the subject extensively at that time. I just tried a search of hamblin.com, who devoted a week to rape vitim's stories, and got nothing new. Mike Reagan's site- reagan.com - had repeats of stories already covered in those links.
I suggest that hillary feels
1) that those sluts deserved it for scr*wing him when they know he's married to her and
2)he "still cares" about her because he doesn't RAPE HER. Sick and sad. "
Are you kidding? You gotta be kidding. How's about this simple and obvious explanation:
- Hillary went along with his escapades becaues she was an enabler who benefited from the parternship (witness her milking sympathy from the public to get her senate seat).
She probably thought of ol' Billy as the star pitcher of the team and hey since he's a Cy Young Winner, then let him be a bad boy in the clubhouse (pardon the sports metaphor).
I can asssure you that if she was complicit (as has been alleged) that there ain't love between em (as most folks would describe it in a marriage).
Yet another appalling thing about these 'users' of people is that for someone so 'concerned' about women's issues (Hillary) it's absolutely shameful that their private lives are 180 degrees in the other direction. Women (and any of the other 'small' people of the world) are to be used in their Machivaellian Socialist minds.
It shows that their 'act' of protecting women is just that...an act. It's more than just hypocrisy. It's a lie a blatant lie. And it's that simple!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.