Will Ashcroft Obey House Subpoena Commanding Evidence by11th or KeepProtecting Clinton?Thread 2 1/2

US States House of Congress Website ^ | United States Congress (Subpoena)

[t-shirt]

By Authority of the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States of America

To United States Department of Justice Serve: Attorney General John Ashcroft

You are hereby commanded to produce the things identified on the attached schedule before the

full committee on Government Reform

of the House of Representatives of the United States, of which the Hon.

Dan Burton is chairman, by producing such things in room 2157 of the

Rayburn Building, in the city of Washington, on

September 11, 2001, at the hour of 5:00 PM

To Danleigh Halfast or US Marshals Service

to serve and make return.

Witness by my hand and seal
of House of United States, at the city of Washington, this
6th day of September, 2001

(signed)Dan Burton
Chairman

----------------------------------------------------------------

To see actual subpoena:

http://www.house.gov/reform/letters/ashcroft_subpoena.pdf

[t-shirt]

God bless the Congress of the United States of America and the Government Reform Committee in particular!
I just happened to decide to go to the House Website tonight and found this!

The United States House of Representatives if ordering US Attorney General Ashcroft to hand over all the criminal evidence from Clinton and Janet Reno Administration related criminal investigations.

----------

To see original thread go to:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b99d9b10b76.htm

To see Thread II go to:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b9a84661c0d.htm

Another important question I have is:

Will the media even bother reporting the existence of this subpoena and the fact that it orders Ashcroft to turn over the evidence on Clinton and his criminal gang.

That have not yet reported this subpoena at all as all as far as I know.

[t-shirt]

Justice or not?

[rebdov]

I am baffled by Bush's reluctance to go after the Clinton's. I am also baffled why he doesn't rescind all of the Clinton executive orders. What is stopping him?

[t-shirt]

bump for justice for Clinton!

[t-shirt]

Justice Bump!

[Sandy]

Please....You really need to stop abusing the breaking news box.

[Pee_Oui]

I hate to say it, but you won't hear it in the news media, and they won't turn over the papers, they will continue to protect bubba, thus setting the precidence for the same favor being returned in each succeeding administration.

I still can't quite figure why they keep stalling in the release of the Reagan papers after 12 years, unless, there is detrimental information on Bush I.

DL

[t-shirt]

bump

[dts32041]

Those pesky FIBII files, showing his daddy (bush I) at medina on an SR-71.

The actual truth will never be known cause ashcroft believes he has a dead man watching him.

[t-shirt]

Turn Over The Evidence Bump!

[t-shirt]

Justice!

[E.G.C.]

Ashcroft Subpoena

Original Thread

Thread 2

[t-shirt]

Let The Truth come out!

[t-shirt]

Thanks please inform people of this thread and story I must go!

The date is Sept. 11, 2001, 5:00 Washington DC.

[t-shirt]

bump

[rebdov]

"medina on an SR-71. "

Pardon my ignorance, but what is this?

[Common Tator]

by Authority of the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States of America

To United States Department of Justice Serve: Attorney General John Ashcroft

You are hereby commanded to produce the things identified on the attached schedule before the

The fact is the House Of Representatives has zero authority to make a President or anyone who works for him do anything the president dosen't want to do. That is what the constitution means by 3 EQUAL branched of goverment. NO one brach answers to the other except on impeachment. Ofcourse the DOJ can indict Congressmen and Judges too. But demanding papers has not validity in law.

Members of the house have been demanding papers and reports from the excutive branch since Thomas Jefferson was President.

Jefferson and every president who has followed has told the legislative branch to shove it.

The president who got hounded the most was Andrew Johnson. They almost convincted him on impeachment, but failed by one vote. They were not after Johnson, they just wanted to nail the people who had served with Lincoln.

A congressman from New York whose name was Hamilton Fish was always trying to make FDR divulge stuff. FDR has a ton of fun at Fish's expense. Fish was a third generation New York legislator, and loved to taunt FDR. FDR had a way of saying "REP PRE SENT TA TIVE HAM "ILL" "TON" Fehhhh isssh" Thea Thi errr DAAA that was funny as hell.

Every time the press asked FDR if he was going to meet Fish's demands, FDR would spend what seemed like 3 or 4 minutes just saying Fish's title and name once. After he said the name he would continue to say the matter is under consideration and deliberation. It took FDR another 3 minues to get consideration and deliberation fully enunciated.

After a while no won paid any attention to "REP PRE SEN TA TIVE HAM ILL TON FEEEEESSSSSH. THE THE ERRR DAAA. I believe Fish finally lost his bid for re-election.

If Burton keeps it up so will he.

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

Burton's Subpoena is ALSO looking for things BEFORE Clinton,
the documents requested go back 4 decades,
so Burton has provided a reason why this administration
can release ALL the documents without being accused of just going after Clinton.
An Explanation of the Items Under Subpoena
and their Significance

[eastforker]

mena and state route 71

[TheGrimReaper]

Reservations for 2 at the Gray Bar Hotel in beautiful Leavenworth, Kansas.
Check-in: IMMEDIATELY.
Check-out: December 2026.
Accomodations: 1 twin bed, TV with one channel (The Monica Network), Bread and water served in-room 3 times daily.
Name: Mr. & Mrs. William J. Clintoon.
Paid for by: U.S. Taxpayers (gladly!)

Enjoy your visit!

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

"Will the media even bother reporting the existence of this subpoena and the fact that it orders Ashcroft to turn over the evidence on Clinton and his criminal gang."

You can bet Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch will cover this up and/or spin it.
China AOL Time Warner and News Corp (aka Fox News) "Deal" - The REAL Story - from China

[eastforker]

excuse me, I think he was refering to an sr 71 blackbird.Tin foil hat stuff to some to others it's damning evidence.

[rebdov]

Mena, not medina! Ahhhh. What has that to do with Bush? Because the CIA was sending dope through Clinton and Roger's noses?

[Grut]

...when they can least afford to have it come out, blam there it is.

Historically, it's been more like ''blam, there it isn't.''

[libertarian_usa]

What was that the conservatives were saying about ashcroft and the "rule of law"?

BAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHA

[Bouncer]

thus setting the precidence for the same favor being returned in each succeeding administration

And with that my friend you hit the nail right on the head!

The evidence almost came out on Bush I, and he had to pardon practically the entire Cabinet on Christmas Day just before he left office so that the [Iran/Contra] evidence would be buried forever. Bush II wants no messy scene like that at the end of their tenure.
It's every FReepers wet dream to have Clinton and his cohorts hunted down and dragged before the firing squad but it's time you all got over that fantasy - it ain't gonna happen. Bush II knows this and doesn't want to set a dangerous precedent by giving a nutcase like Burton any ammunition.
Remember when Clinton signed the Bill reauthorizing the Special Prosecutor Law (despite having been advised against it)? Bet he wishes now that he had followed the advice he was given and let the law expire. You can bet Bush II ain't gonna do anything that stupid that could come back to bite him.

[Zon]

Assuming all or the majority of that is true, does honesty and justice prevail? Should those taxpayers that want to see what they paid for be refused? The Point and principle question is, has honesty and justice prevailed?

[MeekOneGOP]

Thread 2.5? All right!. . . ;-)

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Thanks for the heads up. AG Ashcroft will of course follow the law. Think carefully about what the liberal press (and DC courts) will do with the documents. They are still trashing the USSC for the election 2000 decision and are clearly uninterested in investigating the Dems. for massive vote fraud. Think about how they've re-written history and legislated from the bench. I understand and agree with the caution behind this decision. AG Ashcroft will follow the law.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

BTTT!

[Robert_Paulson2]

I wonder about this... is Bush going to protest and force congressional oversight committees to actually revisit the job they SHOULD have done regarding Clintong, or is the "conspiracy" view of Bush/Clintong, in fact reality?

I don't want to believe, but it is curious indeed... If ashcroft gives in after a few or months of delay, and then sends strategically redacted information that raises NEW questions, it would be a ploy for exposing Clinton, I THINK.

If they stonewall indefinitely, the fix has almost GOT to be in... why would Ashcroft cover up the China connections, unless his buddies in the Senate were implicated, or our national security was REALLY at stake.

I just don't KNOW? Will everything unfold in its own time? Or are we up against an immovable conspiracy?

[Lexington Green]

New Godfather - same mafia

[dts32041]

All the old stories, medina drug connections, sr-71 to paris for hostage negotiations, etc.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

White House Sets Up Clash Over Congressional Inquiry</a href>

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

BTTT!

[varon]

Will everything unfold in its own time?

No way. The political mafia protect their own regardless of party affiliation.

[It'salmosttolate]

If you've got a few days read PRESIDENT FOX GUARDING NARCO-HEN HOUSE? this.

[t-shirt]

These aren't just papers and reports, these are criminal investigations and the Justice department is not permitted to hid them from the Congress.

Do you want Clinton protected by the evidence being withheld from Congress?

[t-shirt]

Yes Burton and the Committee and Congress respectively is also commanding Ashcroft to turn over evidence, etc., of why the FBI allow an paid informant Flemmi--a mobster to murder ten while he was under their supervision and on their payroll!

[t-shirt]

Please....You really need to stop abusing the breaking news box.

6 Posted on 09/09/2001 13:50:32 PDT by Sandy

How am I abusing the breaking news box by reporting this story?

Is enough important enough?

How many people in the country even know about this?

Who in the mainstream media has reported this subpoena from Congress ordering Ashcroft to turn over these documents?

Is there some reason you don't want people to know about this?

Do you complain when people post endless non-news threads under breaking?

[Geezerette]

Bump!

g

[telos]

This is breaking news alright, keep up the pressure, you may shake something out.

[Lucky]

Let all the truth out! I could say more but since this is only 1/2 a thread, I might be cut o.......

[Angelique]

I still believe that Ashcroft is not or will not protect Clinton. He is working from the former Reno Justice Department, and his entire career has been one of honor.

[t-shirt]

Do you think Ashcroft will obey Congress and turn over the subpoenaed criminal investigation evidence on Clinton and his criminal gang, and the Mafia?

[t-shirt]

What if Ashcroft doesn't turn it over?

[goldilucky]

bump for justice!

[Angelique]

As I mentioned before, I believe there is a lot more to the investigation, and it will not die with Ashcroft. Perhaps the question should be, why the subpoena, and why now?

[ChaseR]

"Please....You really need to stop abusing the breaking news box." 6 Posted on 09/09/2001 13:50:32 PDT by Sandy

t-shirt, make sure to disregard this fool -bttt