Skip to comments.
Freep this poll on Bush v. Gore decison (democrats.com & others trying to sway this one to the l
MSNBC Online ^
Posted on 09/09/2001 10:55:31 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
Current Poll numbers:
Did the recount decision hurt the Supreme Court's credibility? * 9020 responses
No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law. 42%
Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated. 56%
I'm undecided. 2%
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-115 next last
Get freeping! Democrats.com has this on the top of its page and is trying to get the dems to vote against the Bush v. Gore decision.
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: GOPcapitalist
Voted NO!
To: Alamo-Girl,Yellow Rose of Texas,amom,Bump in the night,Snow Bunny
ping
To: Billie
ping
To: Ben Ficklin,ClancyJ,Miss Marple
ping
To: GOPcapitalist
BTTT
7
posted on
09/09/2001 11:12:42 PM PDT
by
brat
To: swheats,daisyscarlett,Utah Girl,Teacup, Iowa Granny, Pollyshy, Mountaineer,Timeout,,LBGA, Pubmom
ping
To: COB1
ping
To: BlueAngel,CheneyChick,LadyX,
ping
To: GOPcapitalist
I voted, but I am angry as heck that they have such a poll! Why are they bringing this up again after all of this time? Nevermind, I know why, anything to undermine the President who was legally elected, thank God!
The media is so blatant now about their democratic bias, they have no shame and no journalist integrity left.
To: rintense, ejo, fiddlstix, lawgirl, teacup, wait4truth, truthNtegrity, TXbubba, RonDog
ping
To: GOPcapitalist
It is late and I must be tired.
Where do I find the poll?
By the way the picture at Democrats.com is another case of the loss of respect for our leaders! What a shame our children see this stuff and think it is OK!
13
posted on
09/09/2001 11:19:38 PM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: Monkey Face, village idiot, soccermom, homeschool mama, esther2, pubmom, BeforeISleep, clikker
ping
To: GOPcapitalist
bump
15
posted on
09/09/2001 11:21:04 PM PDT
by
Outraged
To: Momto2, freekitty, mtngrl@vrwc, The Wizard, PhiKapMom, Howlin, STARWISE, slyfox, apackof2, star fan
ping
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Bump for a no vote! Newsweek often publishes some of the results of its webpolls in its week after magazine issue. They are not scientific polls, but they can be suggestive to readers.
To: WIladyconservative, bannie, tanglecreek, slyfox, hillsborofox, Brasil, notaliberal, Texas Mom, Eaker
ping
To: Jim Robinson
ping
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Still holding at same percentages. Only added 200 votes sinces first post
Nam Vet
20
posted on
09/09/2001 11:24:58 PM PDT
by
Nam Vet
To: Republican Wildcat, ladyinred, Salvation, GretchenEE, Republic, Wife of D28Man, kitkat
ping
To: right-sidedNYer, SuziQ, reaganite, callista , RIGHT IN SEATTLE , xenalyte, zgirl
ping
To: daniel boob, NYC GOP Chick, BigWaveBetty, d14truth, FRlurker, mickeylee, Bigg Red, altura
ping
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
24
posted on
09/09/2001 11:27:19 PM PDT
by
Mogger
To: General Maximus, d14truth, section 9, reformed_dem, ohioWfan, blackbart, jlyspio , JulieRNR21
ping
To: drANN!, Wsno1fan, kattracks, GinaL, Dubya_gal, IrishGOP, omegatoo, SmokinBabeJen formerly MDQ
ping
Comment #27 Removed by Moderator
To: lonestar, jetmech, Cyberant, fred flinch, jlyspio, StoneColdGOP, redhead, swheats, fish hawk
ping
To: WaterDragon, Momto2, marylina, Brad's Gramma, Rita289, SuppressedNews.com, bondjamesbond
ping
To: GOPcapitalist
* 9229 responses
No. The ruling was a correct interpretation of the law.
42%
Yes. The court's decision was obviously politically motivated.
56%
I'm undecided.
2%
30
posted on
09/09/2001 11:31:02 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: GOPcapitalist
WHO GIVES A RATS A$$ ABOUT A "NEWSPEAK" POLL?! Let the democraps have their petty victory. Like it makes a frickin' difference! Sheece!
To: lonestar, jetmech, Cyberant, fred flinch, jlyspio, StoneColdGOP, redhead, fish hawk
ping
To: WaterDragon, Momto2, marylina, Brad's Gramma, Rita289, SuppressedNews.com, bondjamesbond
ping
To: Pricia, smileee, Libertina, Calpublican, McGavin999, Gmax, Swede Girl, Nightowl, duchess
ping
To: Clinton's a liar
ping
To: Alberta's Child, hoosiermama, whoever,joyfull, Allegra, Dustbunny, georgejr., big steve, looney tune
ping
To: ll&poh, GOP_Lady, MJY1288, WomanofStandard, StarFan, patriciaruth, Fletchergirl, mystery-ak
ping
To: 2Trievers, daisyscarlett, shrinkermd, Nea Wood, Inspectorette, GWfan, blackbart1, I'm ALL Right!
ping
To: jtill, Corporate Law, maica, anniegetyourgun, Gdpleaser, dr.j'sfirst, reflecting, sunny, cmsgop
ping
To: 1Peter2:16, okstatemom, carton253, GraniteStateConservative, grayson50, Justice, rvoitier, WHATNEXT?
ping
To: Quaz957, Califreeper, SkyPilot, KansasConservative, grammymoon, dutchess, thnx243dignity, ReveBM
ping
To: proud American in Canada, sheilah, what's up, Aric2000, admiralsn, petuniasevan, motherlydia
ping
To: Dr. Alex Cross, BamaDi, Cinnamon Girl, Lauratealeaf
ping
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
I think this is why the Dems can't get anything accomplished they are so mired in grudges. It's definately time to move on from election 2000.
45
posted on
09/09/2001 11:48:16 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: GOPcapitalist
voted and bumped
To: patriciaruth,Ms. AntiFeminazi ,Ragtime Cowgirl,basil, ValerieUSA, LurkerNoMore!, The Bat Lady, TXBub
ping
To: Joey00
This must nearly, if not totally, unprecidented. Challenging legitimacy of the declared winner of Presidential election, months after the he took office. Years would not be so unusal, but by then it's an exercise for historians, not politicians. In this case it is an obvious attempt to discredit and delegitimize a sitting President. Maybe a little too obvious. Maybe its someting darker, like a coverup for their own nefarious acts, and a possible prelude to something much darker. Remember this is the bunch taking campaign contributions from the Communist Chinese, who are busy rattling their own sabers at the moment.
48
posted on
09/09/2001 11:52:02 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: johnhuang2
hey JH can you work that bump list of yours?
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson