Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong Clinton to Blame
NewsMax | Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2001 | Christopher Ruddy

Posted on 09/12/2001 5:13:03 AM PDT by truther

CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong – Clinton to Blame

The worst, single most tragic day in the history of America has just passed. Tuesday more Americans likely died than all the casualties of the Battle of Antietam on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 1862.

Already the media spin on yesterday's events is relentless.

The talking heads are pushing several themes, including:

* Now is not the time to point fingers at responsible parties in America, i.e., political figures like Clinton or our own security agencies.

* The events of Tuesday are the "worst-case scenario" – the worst is over.

* Osama bin Laden is the culprit.

On these points of spin, the first one is baloney. Of course we need to find why our security failed. This is basic.

And unless the big media are consulting a psychic better than the one I use, no one knows what the future days, weeks and months may yield. This is not the worst-case scenario. A worst-case scenario is a 25-megaton nuclear bomb detonated in New York or a full-scale attack against the U.S.! These should not be ruled out.

These dangers can be avoided, we pray, but only if we stop listening to the media idiots that feed us a diet of blow-dried nonsense. Is Katie Couric going to say how bad she feels for the terrorists who were driven to these cowardly acts?

It is the big media and the hack politicians that led us to this nightmarish day.

Smart to Examine Who Failed Us

We are Amercans, so let's get our feet back on the ground and use common sense.

The media say we shouldn't point fingers. (Funny, isn't it, how the media have spent 30 years pointing fingers at Richard Nixon for his alleged crimes, but when one of their liberal favorites is due for some blame, they feed us the mantras like "Let's move on!" and "No time to point fingers!")

Common sense, in fact, dictates that we need to critically examine the people who are to blame for this incident, both the perpetrators (and if you believe Osama bin Laden was the major mastermind behind this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell you) and the people we pay to protect us – that is, our national security agencies.

Without question, these agencies failed miserably in preventing this sophisticated, wide-scale and coordinated attack against America.

Intelligence Agencies Failed Miserably

Tuesday I received an e-mail from a recently retired high-ranking CIA official. I will identify him as "Harry":
Here's what Harry said:

"... Reacting effectively and justly to this [attack] makes us hugely dependent on intell [intelligence] capabilities that failed us miserably. This is an enormous liability, which we shall not be able to fix before we have to react. Payback time for the last eight years!"

He continued: "There were clearly enormous failures here. This operation was ingenious in its simplicity, which would have limited the size (number of people, actions) of the operation and hence detectability. But it could not have been that small for at least a dozen men to hijack four carefully chosen aircraft (routes, fuel load) with carefully coordinated timing. And to get through security with knives big enough to subdue four relatively large crews. If the intell and security systems claim that this challenge is simply too hard for them, they have to be replaced, root and branch. Because this challenge is the challenge. It is now pretty self-evident that claims of reform and adjustment [at the intelligence agencies] to new realities that we've heard over the past eight years or so are hollow."

Of course, it's obvious why the media doesn't want any finger pointing.

Guess who ran the U.S. government and was responsible for our national security for the past eight years? Yes, you got it,

Clinton Responsible for Unpreparedness

The Clintons were supported vociferously by the media through the worst imaginable scandals.

During that time I was one of the lead reporters opposing the Clintons. I was mocked and vilified by my colleagues for doing so. I said throughout that period that Bill Clinton's personal corruption was wholesale and mirrored how he was corrupting America's national security.

I wrote articles and said repeatedly that America, sadly, may end up paying a heavy price for Bill Clinton and the major media's complicity.

I don't believe the worst has passed with the incidents of today.

We remain vulnerable and weak.

Brutally, we witnessed our weakness today.

During eight years, Clinton decimated America's military. Our forces were cut almost in half under his stewardship. Research and development on all new weapons systems were brought almost to a halt as other nations continued to build. Clinton destroyed nearly our entire arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons. Monsters like Saddam flourished as Clinton bombed aspirin factories, tent cities in Afghanistan and worthless radar stations in the Iraqi desert.

These are open facts, easily verifiable.

Clinton, the Ever-Clever Bastard

But Clinton, the ever-clever bastard, was more insidious. Little, systematic changes were undertaken to destroy America's intelligence agencies.

Let me explain. A regular NewsMax reader, "Roger," was a CIA spy in the Mideast.

I met him almost two years ago. Roger wanted to tell me why a gung-ho American quit the CIA in disgust. Roger said the CIA was not interested in recruiting spies.

Clinton and company knew they could not just tell the CIA to stop recruiting spies. That would look stupid and embarrassing.

So they just changed the rules of how spies are recruited, raising the bar on requirements to such a high degree that the most valuable spies could never meet CIA standards and couldn't work for us.

Previously, I wrote how Clinton effectively stopped the recruitment of Chinese nationals by demanding that only high-ranking embassy officials could be recruited – knowing this is almost impossible.

Roger told me that. Roger reminded me again of this today. He noted that Clinton policies reached their zenith under CIA Director John Deutch and his top assistant, Nora Slatkin. The pair ran Clinton's CIA in the mid-1990s and implemented a "human rights scrub" policy.

Here's how Roger described it in an e-mail Tuesday evening: "Deutch and Nora, Clinton's anti-intelligence plants, implemented a universal 'human rights scrub' of all assets, virtually shutting down operations for 6 months to a year. This was after something happened in Central America (there was an American woman involved who was the common law wife of a commie who went missing there) that got a lot of bad press for the agency.

"After that, each asset had to be certified as being 'clean for human rights violations.'

"What this did was to put off limits, in effect, terrorists, criminals, and anyone else who would have info on these kinds of people."

Roger says the CIA, even under new leadership, has never recovered from the "Human Rights Scrub" policy.

Perhaps that was the intention.

But we, the American people, Congress, and honest media need to examine all of these issues, now and quickly. If we don't, we risk even more grave dangers than those that we just lived through.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; cia; clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-135 next last
To: themightysrc
"I'm sorry for what happened yesterday, but I think you've completely lost it if you think this is all Clinton's fault."

.......and if YOU think yesterday's horrors happened "in a vacuum", or that Clinton didn't (via his "policies" and downright Communist appointees) lay the groundwork for what happened in NY and Washington, then you're either hopelessly naive, woefully uninformed, or pathetically blind to the truth.

51 posted on 09/12/2001 7:42:35 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chemainus
....bin Laden , damn his soul , will be the SOLE scapegoat and another deal will be cut. Show me different and I will eat every word.

Get out the salt and pepper, all terrorists are about to get hit and hit hard. Even most of the Democrats are together with us today, listen to Chuick Schumer, I don't care for him at all, but he is right there with the rest, calling for obliteration of all terrorists. This will not be "business as usual."

52 posted on 09/12/2001 7:46:28 AM PDT by morque2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Thank you! and bump!
53 posted on 09/12/2001 7:46:39 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I'm a Christian but I thought what Graham said was ill-chosen. Not all who believe in God believe in Jesus Christ. Why say things that can only serve to divide?

Did you ever read the part in Revelations where it says EVERY knee will bow, and EVERY tongue confess that Jesus is Lord?

Today, or later; it matters not when; they WILL believe in Jesus.

Will you be with the sheep, or with the goats?

54 posted on 09/12/2001 7:49:38 AM PDT by packrat01 (there will be some division then. you betcha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truther
Lets face it, Clinton and his feel good friends led U.S. national security in a downward spiral for 8 years. He was funded by CHICOMS for cryin out loud !!!!!! Anyone that denies that fact is on crack. Do you think the U.S. could fight a gulf war today? No chance. Clinton emasculated our armed forces because he had no respect for them or our country as evidenced by his acts of treason. He (the liberals) live under a state of utopian dementia. Our enemies knew we were weakened and didn't think we had the stomach for real retaliation. I had friends that are dead now,they were the best friends and the best people I knew with families. I hope we reduce the middle east to rubble and rid this scum from the earth. Its time to bring the war to our enemies. Use the bomb and send them a message they will never forget.
55 posted on 09/12/2001 7:52:04 AM PDT by culpeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemainus
Yep, I agree.
56 posted on 09/12/2001 7:58:55 AM PDT by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BubbaZanetti
BubbaZanetti member since August 29th, 2001

57 posted on 09/12/2001 7:59:29 AM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: morque2001
This article is a little over the top, but just a little.
Remember, Clinton first had to win election twice. We, as an electorate, took the bait.
Yesterday, we felt the sting.
From the night of November 3, 1993, upon news of X42's victory, I felt the hollow dread in my gut. God is not mocked.
58 posted on 09/12/2001 8:19:11 AM PDT by irgbar-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Agree with you 100% on seeing ms. clinton's face on the TV and this morning Fox made sure they covered her speech to the Senate. This is the same woman who hugged arafat's wife and has supported the Palestinians until it became a political liability not to. Anyone that thinks that the clintons/gore are not responsible for what has happened better think again. They gave arafat a world stage to spout his rhetoric and in some cases took his side against the Israeli's. We allowed the UN to have too much control and the clintons cozied up to dictators around the world! And our willing press corps went right along including Russert yesterday asking where clinton was to speak out.

End of my rant except for a final thought -- clintons/gore are responsible for not even taking intelligence briefings from the CIA and pure and simple dessimating the Intelligence community and the military!

59 posted on 09/12/2001 8:25:02 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
As gross as it is to have to do that, she is a senator from New York State. That's why I toughed out listening to Schumer a little while ago. When he warned Americans against being extreme, he restricted it to personal attacks on Arabs here. Then he praised Bush's no distinction remark and said we already know who the terrorist states are: they're on the State Department's list.

Excellent. Now could you do something to get the planes in the air?

60 posted on 09/12/2001 8:25:23 AM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightintexas
"Under Reagan and Bush, Bin Laden and Afgan rebels were CIA funded and trained. We spend BILLIONS on defense, so stop saying Clinton "gutted" all these agencies is just nonsense."

The first statement you made is true; however, there is simply NO WAY their future anti-U.S., terroristic potential could have been known at the time when Reagan was arming the Afghan rebels against the Russians. The earlier decision eventually led to bad results, but it is NOT entirely true that it was a bad decision at the time it was made.

Your second statement is PURE NONSENSE! We will always "spend billions on defense" just like we spend billions on lots of other things, but how many billions and just how the billions are spent are the real issues. Clinton both defunded and politicized intelligence, security, and the military with a vengeance for the full eight years of his disastrous tenure. I wonder if he and Hillary the Great have any appreciation of the results of what they and their evil, lying toadies have done to this country. I doubt it.

61 posted on 09/12/2001 8:27:38 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Thank you so much, A-G! That information is very helpful. Reason being: The traitors are going to - have already begun - blaming Bush for this attack just as they were already blaming him for the economy. Both the economic problems and the military/intelligence weaknesses of our country were INHERITED BY PRESIDENT BUSH from the people who want to destroy America - as long as they are on top in power!

Our enemies are within - and all America must know it!

Mr. Woolsley was on this morning encouraging the Bush administration to go further than just thinking the terrorists and those who "harbor" them must be dealt with. He said he hoped the Bush team would also focus on the NATIONS who finance, who train, who sponsor terrorism as part of their official policy - something the Clinton administration STOPPED DOING SHORTLY AFTER HE CAME INTO OFFICE!!!!

I totally agree with him!

62 posted on 09/12/2001 8:38:48 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
I'm glad the information was helpful!!! Indeed, we must communicate what went wrong so it can be fixed for good!
63 posted on 09/12/2001 8:59:07 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: themightysrc
Intelligence is definitely a substantial part of the prevention effort, no qestion. However, inadequate procedures currently in place in our airports are also at fault. The coordinated and succesful hijacking of four planes from three airports should not even be within the realm of possibility. Intelligence or no!

Does anyone recall the rash of hijackings in the 70's and how they were stopped? Hmmm???

On several occasions during the two term blight on our nation that was the administration of X42, the FAA conducted several studies of airline security. On at least one occasion the findings were addressed directly to the president together with recommended improvements. X42 did not see fit to implement any security enhancements.

Clinton culpible??? I rest my case.

The platform for international terrorist activity over the last thirty plus years has primarily been commercial airline travel. Short of placing armed, federal marshals on board each flight, cockpits should be intruder proof to prevent terrorists from taking over control of aircraft. Video cameras should be installed at every gate to make a visual record of the persons who actually board each flight. I realize the latter is after the fact regarding yesterday's tragedy but I expect the FBI and CIA would give anything to have just such evidence today. If the local convenience store can afford this technology I expect the airports in this country can as well.


64 posted on 09/12/2001 9:00:44 AM PDT by t4texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: christine11, abigail2
65 posted on 09/12/2001 9:13:44 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SmartEnough,the_doc,lukefreeman,oldglory,seekingthetruth,minutegal,gonzo, all
#11: "I'm not going to focus on Clinton. I want to go after the bastards that took advantage and killed Americans!"

You don't solve a problem by dealing with symtoms of the problem. You solve it by dealing with the THE problem.

The PROBLEM is the feminization of America and its great institutions by the party of the emasculated; The DemocRAT Party.

Clinton, "The Great Emasculator" is the epitome / poster boy for that party.

Algore, Clinton's emasculated hand-picked successor, did all in his power to try and prevent the military vote from being counted in Florida.

Algore, the choice of the emasculated party to be THEIR president.

Algore, the feminized male who hired and paid Naiomi Wolfe to teach him how to be an "alpha male".

Cowardly "BASTARDS", as you call them, cannot "take advantage" of MEN.

Thats the "problem" that must be solved.

66 posted on 09/12/2001 9:38:57 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Feminized males and shallow females in the USA have INVITED this attack on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: truther
67 posted on 09/12/2001 9:43:56 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Let's not forget how Clinton used our cruise missile arsenal as a tool for political distraction, bombing aspirin factories and lobbing missiles at Saddam Hussein whenever it became politically useful. Military reports indicated that we couldn't even carry on basic operations with Clinton's misuse of military arms.
68 posted on 09/12/2001 9:50:59 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Did you happen to catch CNN’s Judy Woodruff interview withTom Clancy on the evening of 9/11?

Tom brought up the subject of the CLINTON decimation of US HUMAN INTELLIGENCE capabilities – that going all the way back to Sun Tsu, SPIES are a necessary part of the information gathering process. He mentioned that if we’d had a few spies and spooks out there in this increasingly dangerous world, we MIGHT have gotten one of them close to the perpetrator and been able to interdict the MURDER of perhaps 15,000 Americans in the incredible tragedy we witnessed this morning.

I think it’s safe to say that Clancy knows a bit about the subjects on which he writes.

Tom then tagged CNN by name as one of the news agencies that greeted Clinton’s decimation of the intelligence community with approval, continuing to say that they COULD have spoken out TO OPPOSE HIM but failed to do so. Tom’s rather clear implication was that CNN played a role in today’s catastrophe.

Judy VISIBLY RECOILED – and quickly concluded the interview. Her expression made it clear that she was NOT happy with Tom.

Clancy was RIGHT ON THE MARK and until we DO beef up those assets, it’s gonna happen again – and probably sooner than later.

And do you suppose there is some sinister significance to the fact that this happened on 9-11 (911!)? Are these people THAT sick? Don’t bother responding as that was a rhetorical question.

Let’s all pray – and shed a tear or two -- for the lost firefighters, police officers, innocent citizens and their families. Until this is behind us, we must put aside as many of our partisan differences as our principles will allow.

And we must also pray that our precious Constitution does not become one of the first victims of this SICKENING and senseless act.

THE HORROR! THE H O R R O R!!!!!!!!!!

69 posted on 09/12/2001 9:57:53 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Totally agree with you!
70 posted on 09/12/2001 9:58:07 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: truther
71 posted on 09/12/2001 10:03:05 AM PDT by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: themightysrc
Clinton not largely responsible???? In '96 I predicted that the American public would pay with at least 100,000 lives for their decision for Clinton. Obviously I disagree with you. There are REASONS things happen!!
72 posted on 09/12/2001 10:11:18 AM PDT by armourup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truther Travis McGee
Your sure it wasn't "Usama (correct spelling) Bin Wannabe" yet your sure it was Bubbafuccos fault......uhhh huh. As much as I'd love to kick Usama Bil Klintoooons @ss for his crimes and imprision him for life, I will agree he weakened the implied perception of military response to such acts. I won't blame him for this act but will remember to put his BeeeeAcht's picture kissing Afarats Ho next to that of the WTC burning and collasping when she comes up for re-election.
73 posted on 09/12/2001 10:13:50 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt, the_doc, lukefreeman, oldglory, gonzo, seekingthetruth, all
#9: "I cannot tolerate one second of seeing the traitorous face of Hillary Clinton and her [DemocRAT] toadies in the midst of this heinous attack news coverage. She should be under arrest and sitting in a jail cell - along with Bubba.

I hope you don't mind that I changed the word "Democratic" to DemocRAT. There's nothing democratic about those Socialists/Trotskyites.

Hers is "the face" of the Emasculated Party [the DemocRAT Party] in America.

Clinton, "The Great Emasculator", was himself emasculated. No __MAN__ would EVER admire, or be married to, such a base mentality.

Her mouth was running in the Senate this morning, as if it wasn't UNAMERICAN, emasculated ideas, and practices like those she advocates that didn't INVITE this attack on America in the FIRST place.

74 posted on 09/12/2001 10:14:27 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The Base of the earth are the base of the DemocRAT party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
No kidding! DID ANYONE ELSE SEE HELL-ARY'S SPEECH TODAY? CAMPAIGNING ALREADY ON THIS DAY OF NATIONAL GRIEF. WHAT AN OPPORTUNISTIC B**CH. She spoke for twice as long as President Bush, no accident I'm sure. I hate that woman.
75 posted on 09/12/2001 10:16:11 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: truther
Whew! At this point I'm just glad the fonts didn't get any bigger than they were!
76 posted on 09/12/2001 10:22:59 AM PDT by babylonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Thank you for relaying the info on the Tom Clancy interview. I did not see it. I imagine Judy Woodruff was about to pass out because she will hear about allowing such anti-Clintonista verbiage being aired. The Clinton / Demonazi propaganda wing will be all over her - expecting an apology. I expect hers will be profuse. I can hear her telling Hitlery now:

"I apologize - he got his statements out before I could stop him!!! It won't happen again."

I will bet dollars to donuts, Tom Clancy will never be asked by CNN for an interview again.

77 posted on 09/12/2001 10:28:56 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Great work as always, Alamo-Girl.

I think these clips deserve a thread of their own.

78 posted on 09/12/2001 10:30:44 AM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Ditto your 66 and 74.
79 posted on 09/12/2001 10:34:03 AM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Usama (correct spelling)

Oh Geez, give me a break. Who determines what the correct spelling of an Arabic name is? Tell me, is it Peking or Beijing? Is it Qaddafi or Kaddafi? I would answer rather that if you're going to be that ridiculously picky at a time like this, then you would have to write it in it's original language. Can't do that can you, so leave people alone. It's like telling someone whose house is on fire that they should make sure their house is clean for the firefighters when they arrive.

80 posted on 09/12/2001 10:49:14 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
If I had made the post a single issue of correct spelling I'd agree with ya 100 %. Your post correcting , scolding me in singular fashion is a bigger waste of bandwidth as that's all you had to offer.

The correct spelling BTW is on The FBI Most wanted site and the threat briefings I recieve from goobermint sources missy. Value your opinion when ya have one , but add something substantial or keep yer yap closed when aimed at me. My last to ya , have a nice day.

81 posted on 09/12/2001 11:01:14 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert,Matchett-PI, B Ireland
Looks like 25,000 to 30,000, maybe more, Dick.

And Jan, sweetie, try to remain calm. Whack-the-wog down at the 7-11 if you have to, but chill-out.

I no longer give a rats-ass about Islam! It is a Pig-Religion, and they're killing Americans. They're waging war on us. I'll wage back.

Guess I'll be driving for a while....FRegards

82 posted on 09/12/2001 8:00:04 PM PDT by gonzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: themightysrc
Who was the sole military and/or defense person that alienated us from Afghanistan against the advice and wishes of all the military by ordering missiles to attack an aspirin factory? Read "The Missiles of August" by Seymour Hersh, in the Atlantic Monthly if you want to know. While we had helped Afghanistan fight the Russians, who used pulsed phase magnetic waves to kill Afghanis in their tanks by destroying their nervous system impulses, they had welcomed Osama's money, but were willing to listen to us until BC appeared on the scene. His administration, working through Albright's State Dep't., also insisted, against the DOD, that the Cole be put in harm's way in order to create "good will" in the Mid East, rather than pursue that as their designated purview . My regret is that he was not at the top of the WTC in his chosen office, rather than in Australia, but hopefully some Aussies who did not give up their guns will pick him off.
83 posted on 09/12/2001 9:46:49 PM PDT by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Good reminders, of the evidence against the Clinton regime, Alamo girl. His minions are still left over in the State Dep't. I gather.
84 posted on 09/12/2001 10:01:36 PM PDT by boltfromblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: irgbar-man
From the night of November 3, 1993, upon news of X42's victory, I felt the hollow dread in my gut.

Me too, Before he got elecred, I told every stinking liberal around here that the economy would go to the dogs shortly after he left. I knew then that the military would be the first thing he sacrificed to further his agenda. No, I do not "feel" good about being vindicated. I have nothing but a silent stare for every Liberal POS that asked me, with a sneer, "Who is going to attack us?". Indeed.

85 posted on 09/13/2001 4:23:56 AM PDT by morque2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: truther,abagail2,reformjoy,goldilucky,Landru,ChaseR,Snow Bunny
...The Enemy is now Within ...And it is the CLINTONS...
86 posted on 09/13/2001 5:52:17 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Thank God, for people like Chris Ruddy who have the ability to see beyond the news of today, and who can still add two plus two and come up with four. Eight years of treason from the Clinton administration, along with the lying compliance of the news media, and some of us still have to ask why September llth happened? Unbelievable!
87 posted on 09/13/2001 6:13:13 AM PDT by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
88 posted on 09/13/2001 6:26:36 AM PDT by Greatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

It's always been the Clintons; and I do believe all peoples but the thickest, most ardent agitaters on the Left are awakening to a new day of awareness beyond their wildest imagination, & darkest nightmare.
90 posted on 09/13/2001 7:21:56 AM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
This is for much later; after this dust settles. Could someone who is a techno-file librarian geek look up who worked for this man Church? I am a lurker (Grand Deluxe Model). Please let me know. Baker was commenting on this Church guy less than 2 hours after collapse of the building.
91 posted on 09/13/2001 8:06:50 AM PDT by Dryman (Iraqafghanistan2=glassparkinglot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
I almost wish I had cable just to have watched that exchange between Woodruff and Clancy.
92 posted on 09/13/2001 8:13:20 AM PDT by ExiledinMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2
Also here!
93 posted on 09/13/2001 8:32:34 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ExiledinMD
Clancy stuffed it right up Woodruff's and CNN's respective CLYMERS.

It was a thing of beauty -- and LOONNNNGGGGGG overdue!

Gee, wonder why we haven't heard from Ted and Jane...?

Suppose they're holed up on the ranch?

94 posted on 09/13/2001 8:38:56 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: truther,Landru,goldilucky,reformjoy,Snow Bunny,onyx,JMJ333,miss print

...See follow-up Article on.. ..titled...

'CIA Official Confirms Ruddy Terror Exclusive'

...4-The Enemy is now Within...

...The Was has Come Home...

...and it is the CLINTONS.


95 posted on 09/13/2001 8:45:32 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


We're going to pay, & pay & pay for that one for a very, long, time.

I could scream.

96 posted on 09/13/2001 3:01:05 PM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dead culture watch,spald,David Lane,djreece,river rat,Entropy Squared,jobshopper,537 Votes,
This post really needs to be bumped, and flagged for others- I have used some of those mass emailers I occasionally post to send links to this story to many papers, letters to editors, and opinion makers- in the hopes that more of the public will read this, and learn...
97 posted on 09/13/2001 4:23:57 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

98 posted on 09/13/2001 5:36:02 PM PDT by Mary's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

"..The Enemy is now Within ...And it is the CLINTONS..." You better believe that the Clintons were behind this. I heard that there was 1.6 billion (or trillion) in a fund paid into by American taxpayers which turned up missing around the time of the Clinton era.

All I can say is that Clinton brought this war upon us for the sake of covering himself for indictments and treason! As Hillary Clinton says "Hell To Pay" to the American people, let's see who's going to paying hell.

Those terrorists responsible had to be trained to fly and paid for their time. Also, the fact that they left suicide notes and pilot training manuals written in Arabic and then died in the blast for the purpose of covering up their identities in the blast is laughable. Where did they get the money to fund this act? An act of war like this has a price both in money and in human causalities.

I heard you on Bob Dornan today, Aloha Ronnie while I was helping a friend clean up their boat.

99 posted on 09/13/2001 6:28:55 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
If anyone really blame on some Camel chasing "sheik" about this attack - you're mistaken. First to blame on "RELIGION" Religion is the one teach, brainwash, give thought to individuals - they lives is worthless without God, Allah, etc. There are EVIL people, but "If" there would not be followers (religious, liberal, addicted people) those EVIL people would not have the power. Look: Hitler, Stalin, Mao - they begin they careers with major destruction. They are teaching on university. Unfortunetelly not as "an evil" tension but as a workable action against public resistance. Liberals' tools to carry on they manifesto. In present case could be very much - make America a police state and be able to confiscate all private arms. I would look for those who mastermined the all act - in America. They had the knowledge, coordinate, timing. Those who carry through or finished it, yes; they were religious, braiwashed Muslims. But this "All act" came from a big timer, from a leader. The worst part I'm a fear; being in or near a high-rise building, because act like that will teach those little guys the so-called terrorists and they might try it too.
100 posted on 09/13/2001 6:40:40 PM PDT by brother steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson