Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utterly Ungracious Attitude & Behavior of Hillary Clinton During This Time
Free Republic ^

Posted on 09/14/2001 3:06:54 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

Has anyone else noticed Hitlery's behavior the past 2 or 3 days? I've been forced to watch her, since she's been on the news everywhere. This woman, who embraced and kissed Yasser Arafat's wife, has shown her true anti-American colors in these ways:

1. Hillary has made NO strong public (or even a private) statement condemning the celebratory behavior of the Palestinians. Hillary publicly embraces their leaders, and is silent when their people cheer the deaths of her constituents.

2. Hitlery has avoided blatant public support for the President--something no other politician has done. She is relatively silent on the subject, when the consensus even among fellow liberals is to stand with enthusiasm behind the Commander in Chief.

3. Hitlery, in her statement following the Senate vote for $40 Billion in relief funds, gave credit to a great number of people, and as almost an afterthought, mentioned that the President agreed to what was requested. The statement she made was an attempt to make Mr. Bush look like he had to be PERSUADED to increase help...nothing could be further from the truth.

4. Hitlery did not accompany Mr. Bush to the site of destruction in New York. Indeed, even the ultra-liberal Charles Schumer stood beside the President during this visit. Perhaps the former First Lady didn't want to be in the shadow of a President and her Senior Senator.

5. Hitlery has avoided referring to Mr. Bush as the nation's leader. Again in comparison with the senior Senator Schumer, himself no friend of G.W. Bush, she's been missing in action. Mr. Schumer said in his address to the Senate on September 12 that partisanship was not acceptable on this issue--that the President was the leader, and that Americans were the followers. Hillary seems to purposely avoid endorsing that point.


TOPICS: Announcements; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Slyfox
Im glad all you folks have this tragedy in good perspective. You should all go cool off... you sound like a bunch of losers.
21 posted on 09/14/2001 3:33:46 PM PDT by koda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hidy
I learned on CNN that Chelsea was 12 blocks from the world trade center. They did not mention the names of the other 1 Million people located within 12 blocks of the world trade center, and more particularly they did not mention the names of the 10,000's who were in the world trade center.

You would think - according to CNN - this whole thing was a publicity stunt for the x1st family.

22 posted on 09/14/2001 3:34:51 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Hitlery

A political turd waiting to be flushed down the toilet of the next election.
23 posted on 09/14/2001 3:36:35 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Selara
"As much as I disapproved of Bill's past and ongoing antics, he looked alive and human. Hillary, on the other hand, looked dead and full of hate."

That's 'cause Bill just got him some down in Australia...........probably a lot. Hill probably hasn't had any since Vince bit the bullet.

24 posted on 09/14/2001 3:36:48 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Noticed she and @sshole dragged the brat with them today. Never miss a photo op. Didn't notice anyone else there with their kids.
25 posted on 09/14/2001 3:37:34 PM PDT by fightu4it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Gore and Clinton out of the country when this tragedy happens. think about it.
26 posted on 09/14/2001 3:38:30 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
(This from http://www.boortz.com/nealznuze.htm 9-13-01)
(RECALL THIS INFORMATION EACH AND EVERY TIME HITLERY POPS UP ON THE CLINTON NEWS NETWORK DURING THE HOUR OR SO OF FREE AIR TIME CNN GIVES HER EACH DAY. GIVEN HER MISERABLE, DOMINEERING PERSONALITY AND THE NATURE OF THEIR RELATIONSHIP, YA JUST GOTTA KNOW SHE HAD A HAND IN ALL OF THIS. Dick Bachert – not Boortz. But I feel sure Neal would concur.)

Remember Pan Am 103? That’s the airplane that was brought down by a bomb over Scotland. One Libyan terrorist has been convicted. Was the Libyan government held responsible? There was ample evidence that Kadaffy (there are 341 ways to spell it) was part of the plot. Did we go after him? Hardly. Seth Lipsky, writing in today’s Wall Street Journal, tells us that the Clinton Administration even acted on behalf of Libya to prevent families of the victims from pressing claims against the Libyan government. Oh, and that convicted bomber? Guess who’s has joined in handling his appeal --- not in American courts, but in the Scottish courts. None other than our Clintonista pal, Alan Dershowitz.

So --- just why did the Clinton Administration work so hard to keep Libya from paying for the Pan Am 103 bombing? Maybe there’s a good reason … so, what is it?

There’s more:

American citizen Alisa Flatow was killed in an Iranian funded terrorist attack in Israel. Our congress passed a law that allowed American victims of terrorism to sue in court. Soverign immunity for acts of terrorism was removed by that law. Alisa Flatow’s family sued, and won a big judgment. When the Flatow family tried to collect under the law the Clinton Administration stepped in and argued against the Flatow family in court. Clinton wanted the Iranians to be allowed to keep their property and assets.

So – how is this for fighting terrorism? American citizens are victimized by terrorists. They work through the legal processes – even under a law passed by our own congress – to recover damages from the parties responsible. Then along comes Bill Clinton and his gang to protect ---- who? The victims? NO! The terrorists!

Can someone please explain this to me?

27 posted on 09/14/2001 3:41:25 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Well...honestly now, you're not really surprised are you ?
28 posted on 09/14/2001 3:43:59 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
The echo is probably coming from Hildebeasts empty head. I thought it was great today when the rescue workers barked at GW. Obviously GW appeals to the genuine male types. What a difference between them and the sniveling snots that love Billy boy.
29 posted on 09/14/2001 3:45:38 PM PDT by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: leilani
Lest America ever forget why X-42, W(B)-97, and all their enablers should be hectored, hounded, and harried into silence, until "clintonese is only spoken in Hell," look here:

CIA Officials Reveal What Went Wrong – Clinton to Blame

-Murder, Inc.--

-The number of "suicides" for people linked to this and other Clinton-related cases--

-ATTENTION BLOODHOUNDS--

-Women in the Clinton Era: Abuse,Intimidation and Smears--

-The Anti-Hillary Homepage by MrBungle--

-Hillary Clinton-What America Needs to Know--

-Sen. Hillary Clinton--NewsMax.com Hot Topics--

Hillary! and Arafat's wife-


30 posted on 09/14/2001 3:46:41 PM PDT by backhoe (Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel *safer* yet? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
This is the weak resolution the Senate is working on. Compare it to a real declaration of war from 1941

SJ 22 ES

107th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. J. RES. 22


JOINT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the terrorist attacks launched against the United States on September 11, 2001.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked and destroyed four civilian aircraft, crashing two of them into the towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, and a third into the Pentagon outside Washington, D.C.;

Whereas thousands of innocent Americans were killed and injured as a result of these attacks, including the passengers and crew of the four aircraft, workers in the World Trade Center and in the Pentagon, rescue workers, and bystanders;

Whereas these attacks destroyed both towers of the World Trade Center, as well as adjacent buildings, and seriously damaged the Pentagon; and

Whereas these attacks were by far the deadliest terrorist attacks ever launched against the United States, and, by targeting symbols of American strength and success, clearly were intended to intimidate our Nation and weaken its resolve: Now, therefore, be it

Passed the Senate September 12, 2001.

Compare this wimpy drivel to this:

JOINT RESOLUTION

Declaring that a state of war exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to prosecute the same.

Whereas the Imperial Government of Japan has committed unprovoked acts of war against the Government and the people of the United States of America:

Therefore be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of war between the United States and the Imperial Government of Japan which has thus been thrust upon the United States is hereby formally declared;

and the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on was against the Imperial Government of Japan; and, to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States.

Approved, December 8, 1941, 4:10 p.m. E.S.T.

31 posted on 09/14/2001 3:47:25 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I saw her address at WTC site. She did it AGAIN! She strung together a whole mess of words that didn't have a coherent thought. At this time in our Nation's history that's totally inappropiate. She also looked cold and somewhat defeated. When it's time for patriotism don't expect this tired old socialist dou%*ebag to step forward. She's an old commie hack that hates the constitution and all the freedom it stands for.

The ONLY good thing to come out of this is that she & her ilk are being exposed for the traitors that they really are. The light of liberty has been turned on but there's nowhere for the cockroaches to run!

God Bless these here United States of America and all of her Patriots!!!!

32 posted on 09/14/2001 3:48:55 PM PDT by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Her appearance at ground zero was obviously a show, just like her husbands on the shores of Normandy, they don't care about anybody but themselves. I don't recall the details but I think she was stumping for her National Health Care program in 1993. Hitlery was going to do a photo op at a hospitol in a cancer ward for childern and once she saw how the children with cancer actually looked she sent them away. To do the photo op she had the hospitol staff bring in other children that looked healthier, including some of the hospitol staff's own children. Just as sickening, Pete, Dan & Tom said nothing. This person is beyond evil, a true incarnation of the real Hitler.
33 posted on 09/14/2001 3:49:07 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
All of her network face time tapes from the last few days will be edited together and reshown at the next Democratic National Convention for her Presidential run. Just watch.
34 posted on 09/14/2001 3:50:20 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demosthenes
~BUMP~
35 posted on 09/14/2001 3:50:49 PM PDT by Maquisard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: koda
koda, you sound like a Hillaryfan to me.
36 posted on 09/14/2001 3:51:36 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Lady Macbeth!
37 posted on 09/14/2001 3:53:06 PM PDT by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Look who else showed up.


38 posted on 09/14/2001 3:56:08 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Guess who's jealous?


39 posted on 09/14/2001 3:58:26 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I was watching Fox News today with the mass in Washington.

Why was Fox News focusing on the Hildabitch, Blubba, and "Chuggin'" Chelsea so much?
At the end of the mass when all the congregation was singing the "Battle Hymn of the Republic", I was really hoping that Fox would close in on Blubba & co. to see if they were singing. They never did.
Any bet that they were not?

40 posted on 09/14/2001 3:59:11 PM PDT by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson