Skip to comments.
China Censors Anti-U.S. Reaction to Assist U.S.
The Washington Post ^
| Saturday, Sep 15, 2001
| By John Pomfret
Posted on 09/15/2001 10:08:14 AM PDT by piasa
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:19 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Propaganda Ministry issued an "urgent notice" late Wednesday ordering the media, including Internet portals, not to publish anything that gloated about the attack or seemed to insult the United States, the sources said.
The move seemed designed to demonstrate official support for the United States and its declared war against terrorism after a series of official reactions to the Washington and New York attacks that were interpreted by diplomats as tentative.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
09/15/2001 10:08:14 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: Howlin, Travis McGee, John Huang2, Deb
FYI
2
posted on
09/15/2001 10:09:39 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
Very interesting.
To: piasa
China is just not ready, yet, for a mixup with Americans.
To: independentmind
5
posted on
09/15/2001 10:29:04 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: William Terrell
True. But they could sure mix us up with somebody else.
6
posted on
09/15/2001 10:30:27 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
What would happen if we start to have tensions with someone else (like China) in the midst of this war? Do we have the resources?
To: piasa
This was reported in the Washington Post and was pulled sometime after the attacks. Headline was on Drudge but the link wouldn't work.
8
posted on
09/15/2001 10:35:20 AM PDT
by
cibco
We're in it one way or the other. They brought it to us and we've got to kill some snakes.
9
posted on
09/15/2001 10:36:30 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: cibco
Interesting- anyone know why? Someone sent the links to me.
10
posted on
09/15/2001 10:38:51 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: cibco
Check out the other link above... seen it before?
11
posted on
09/15/2001 10:41:24 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
I tried to send the links twice and they are out there in cyber-space somewhere... Maybe the Martians are reading them?
12
posted on
09/15/2001 10:42:10 AM PDT
by
cibco
To: piasa
"Check out the other link above... seen it before?"
This is the first time I've seen this story. Interesting...
13
posted on
09/15/2001 10:45:00 AM PDT
by
cibco
To: piasa
Mega-bump!
To: piasa
Mega-bump!
To: piasa
Mega-bump!
To: piasa
Mega-bump!
To: FReethesheeples
Thanks for the bump. "Lerts have more fun."
18
posted on
09/15/2001 7:52:13 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: piasa
Diplomats and analysts said the agreement was significant because it underscored attempts by China to strengthen ties to the Taliban.Red China always seems to want to be on the side of evil......
To: piasa
They censored posts of cheering, not anti-American ones.
20
posted on
09/16/2001 5:29:58 PM PDT
by
Lake
To: Lake
No kidding- that's what it says in the first sentence. Does that make censorship OK? Oh, they're doing it in our favor this time, so that's OK with us? Would we not think it bad if they censored pro-American views? Why do we treat China as if it was a free society when they can turn opinions on and off like a light bulb?
compare this article with the one linked in post #5.
They were trying to make closer ties to the Taliban in Afghanistan early last week- a deal on the 12th reportedly signed. So then, on the 13th it was A-OK to criticise the US and so forth, and minimize the reports on the bombing.
Then, things get a little hot. The US is very POed over getting attacked- threatens to pursue all supporters of terrorism, particularly with reference to those lending aid and comfort to the Taliban. Very scary. So on the 14th its time to censor the stuff hosrile to the US. Flip the switch.
No one is listening to the average Chinese- and no one speaks for them, either. We don't make much effort to counter their government lines, and their government just turns off the ones who get too inquisitive. Now we're making a deal with them to let them broadcast programming over here, nationwide, through Time-Warner. You know, free country and all. What concession did we get in return? They'll let us broadcast an hour's worth of programming in one province- not nationwide. No doubt with restrictions.
Shouldn't we pressure them to remove barriers to free speech with as much vigor as we push for free trade? Why don't we? What is China afraid that the average Chinese will hear? Why do they have to fear free speech at all?
21
posted on
09/17/2001 3:58:08 AM PDT
by
piasa
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson